1
Bitkeeper compared to Arch
2
==========================
4
BK has a default GUI, which is good, but it's ugly and not all that
5
friendly to the new user. It does pay attention to allowing quick
8
The tool itself is also a bit unfriendly in terms of emitting a lot of
9
noise messages and having lots of wierd commands.
11
Bitkeeper always requires both per-file and per-changeset commands.
12
It seems bad to always require this; at most per-file messages should
13
be optional. Are they really the best option?
15
Claimed to have extremely space-efficient storage, keeping 19 years of
16
history in slightly more than twice the size of the working copy.
18
Hashes: does Baz always have these even without signing? It really
21
Fine-grained event triggers, pre- and post-event.
23
Can remotely find status of a tree, e.g. parent, number of comitters,
24
versioned files, extras, modified, etc.
added
removed
doc/bitkeeper.txt
