7
At times, it can be useful to selectively merge some of the changes
8
in a branch, but not all of them. This is commonly referred to as
9
*cherrypicking*. Here are some examples of where cherrypicking is
12
* selectively taking fixes from the main development branch into
15
* selectively taking improvements out of an experimental branch into
18
To merge only the changes made by revision X in branch ``foo``,
23
To merge only the changes up to revision X in branch ``foo``,
28
To merge only the changes since revision X in branch ``foo``,
33
To merge only the changes from revision X to revision Y in branch ``foo``,
38
Like a normal merge, you must explicitly commit a cherrypick. You may wish
39
to see the changes made using ``bzr diff``, and run your test suite if any,
42
Unlike a normal merge, Bazaar does not currently track cherrypicks.
43
In particular, the changes look like a normal commit and the (internal)
44
revision history of the changes from the other branch is lost.
45
In many cases where they are useful (see above), this is not a major
46
problem because there are good reasons why a full merge should never
47
be done at a later time. In other cases, additional conflicts will need
48
to be resolved when the changes are merged again.
50
Note: The reason why Bazaar doesn't track cherrypicks yet is that doing so
51
can lead to poor performance. We are exploring ways of tracking
52
this information that perform acceptably and hope to improve Bazaar's
53
cherrypicking support in the future accordingly.
59
Cherrypicking can be used to reverse a set of changes made by giving an
60
upper bound in the revision range which is *below* the lower bound.
61
For example, to back-out changes made in revision 10, the command is::
65
If you want to take most changes, but not all, from somewhere else, you
66
may wish to do a normal merge followed by a few reverse cherrypicks.
69
Merging uncommitted changes
70
---------------------------
72
If you have several branches and you accidently start making changes in the
73
wrong one, here are the steps to take to correct this. Assuming you began
74
working in branch ``foo`` when you meant to work in branch ``bar``:
76
1. Change into branch ``bar``.
77
2. Run ``bzr merge --uncommitted foo``
78
3. Check the changes came across (``bzr diff``)
79
4. Change into branch ``foo``
80
5. Run ``bzr revert``.
82
.. TODO Selective file merging?
88
Another option to normal merging is *rebasing*, i.e. making it look like
89
the current branch originated from a different point than it did.
90
Rebasing is supported in Bazaar by the ``rebase`` command provided by
91
the ``rebase`` plugin.
93
The ``rebase`` command takes the location of another branch on which
94
the branch in the current working directory will be rebased. If a branch
95
is not specified then the parent branch is used, and this is usually the
98
The first step identifies the revisions that are in the current branch
99
that are not in the parent branch. The current branch is then set to be
100
at the same revision as the target branch, and each revision is replayed
101
on top of the branch. At the end of the process it will appear as though
102
your current branch was branched off the current last revision of the target.
104
Each revision that is replayed may cause conflicts in the tree. If this
105
happens the command will stop and allow you to fix them up. Resolve the
106
commits as you would for a ``merge``, and then run ``bzr resolve`` to
107
marked them as resolved. Once you have resolved all the conflicts, you
108
should run ``bzr rebase-continue`` to continue the rebase operation.
109
If conflicts are encountered and you decide not to continue,
110
you can run ``bzr rebase-abort``. You can also use ``rebase-todo`` to
111
show the list of commits still to be replayed.
113
Note: Some users coming from central VCS tools with poor merge tracking
114
like rebasing because it's similar to how they are use to working in older
115
tools, or because "perfectly clean" history seems important. Before rebasing
116
in Bazaar, think about whether a normal merge is a better choice.