4
The basic purpose of commit is to
5
1 - create and store a new revision based on the contents of the working tree
6
2 - make this the new basis revision for the working tree
8
We can do a selected commit of only some files or subtrees.
13
The best performance we could hope for is:
14
- stat each versioned selected working file once
15
- read from the workingtree and write into the repository any new file texts
16
- in general, do work proportional to the size of the shape (eg
17
inventory) of the old and new selected trees, and to the total size of
22
1.0 - Store new file texts: if a versioned file contains a new text
23
there is no avoiding storing it. To determine which ones have changed
24
we must go over the workingtree and at least stat each file. If the
25
file is modified since it was last hashed, it must be read in.
26
Ideally we would read it only once, and either notice that it has not
27
changed, or store it at that point.
29
On the other hand we want new code to be able to handle files that are
30
larger than will fit in memory. We may then need to read each file up
31
to two times: once to determine if there is a new text and calculate
32
its hash, and again to store it.
34
1.1 - Store a tree-shape description (ie inventory or similar.) This
35
describes the non-file objects, and provides a reference from the
36
Revision to the texts within it.
38
1.2 - Generate and store a new revision object.
40
1.3 - Do delta-compression on the stored objects. (git notably does
41
not do this at commit time, deferring this entirely until later.)
42
This requires finding the appropriate basis for each modified file: in
43
the current scheme we get the file id, last-revision from the
44
dirstate, look into the knit for that text, extract that text in
45
total, generate a delta, then store that into the knit. Most delta
46
operations are O(n^2) to O(n^3) in the size of the modified files.
48
1.4 - Cache annotation information for the changes: at the moment this
49
is done as part of the delta storage. There are some flaws in that
50
approach, such as that it is not updated when ghosts are filled, and
51
the annotation can't be re-run with new diff parameters.
53
2.1 - Make the new revision the basis for the tree, and clear the list
54
of parents. Strictly this is all that's logically necessary, unless
55
the working tree format requires more work.
57
The dirstate format does require more work, because it caches the
58
parent tree data for each file within the working tree data. In
59
practice this means that every commit rewrites the entire dirstate
60
file - we could try to avoid rewriting the whole file but this may be
61
difficult because variable-length data (the last-changed revision id)
62
is inserted into many rows.
64
The current dirstate design then seems to mean that any commit of a
65
single file imposes a cost proportional to the size of the current
66
workingtree. Maybe there are other benefits that outweigh this.
67
Alternatively if it was fast enough for operations to always look at
68
the original storage of the parent trees we could do without the
71
2.2 - Record the observed file hashes into the workingtree control
72
files. For the files that we just committed, we have the information
73
to store a valid hash cache entry: we know their stat information and
74
the sha1 of the file contents. This is not strictly necessary to the
75
speed of commit, but it will be useful later in avoiding reading those
76
files, and the only cost of doing it now is writing it out.
78
In fact there are some user interface niceties that complicate this:
80
3 - Before starting the commit proper, we prompt for a commit message
81
and in that commit message editor we show a list of the files that
82
will be committed: basically the output of bzr status. This is
83
basically the same as the list of changes we detect while storing the
84
commit, but because the user will sometimes change the tree after
85
opening the commit editor and expect the final state to be committed I
86
think we do have to look for changes twice. Since it takes the user a
87
while to enter a message this is not a big problem as long as both the
88
status summary and the commit are individually fast.
90
4 - As the commit proceeds (or after?) we show another status-like
91
summary. Just printing the names of modified files as they're stored
92
would be easy. Recording deleted and renamed files or directories is
93
more work: this can only be done by reference to the primary parent
94
tree and requires it be read in. Worse, reporting renames requires
95
searching by id across the entire parent tree. Possibly full
96
reporting should be a default-off verbose option because it does
97
require more work beyond the commit itself.
99
5 - Bazaar currently allows for missing files to be automatically
100
marked as removed at the time of commit. Leaving aside the ui
101
consequences, this means that we have to update the working inventory
102
to mark these files as removed. Since as discussed above we always
103
have to rewrite the dirstate on commit this is not substantial, though
104
we should make sure we do this in one pass, not two. I have
105
previously proposed to make this behaviour a non-default option.
107
We may need to run hooks or generate signatures during commit, but
108
they don't seem to have substantial performance consequences.
110
If one wanted to optimize solely for the speed of commit I think
111
hash-addressed file-per-text storage like in git (or bzr 0.1) is very
112
good. Remarkably, it does not need to read the inventory for the
113
previous revision. For each versioned file, we just need to get its
114
hash, either by reading the file or validating its stat data. If that
115
hash is not already in the repository, the file is just copied in and
116
compressed. As directories are traversed, they're turned into texts
117
and stored as well, and then finally the revision is too. This does
118
depend on later doing some delta compression of these texts.
120
Variations on this are possible. Rather than writing a single file
121
into the repository for each text, we could fold them into a single
122
collation or pack file. That would create a smaller number of files
123
in the repository, but looking up a single text would require looking
124
into their indexes rather than just asking the filesystem.
126
Rather than using hashes we can use file-id/rev-id pairs as at
127
present, which has several consequences pro and con.
132
The commit api is invoked by the command interface, and copies information
133
from the tree into the branch and its repository, possibly updating the
134
WorkingTree afterwards.
136
The command interface passes:
138
* a commit message (from an option, if any),
139
* or an indication that it should be read interactively from the ui object;
140
* a list of files to commit
141
* an option for a dry-run commit
142
* verbose option, or callback to indicate
143
* timestamp, timezone, committer, chosen revision id
145
* option for local-only commit on a bound branch
146
* option for strict commits (fail if there are unknown or missing files)
147
* option to allow "pointless" commits (with no tree changes)
149
>>> Branch.commit(from_tree, message, files_to_commit)
151
There will be different implementations of this for different Branch
152
classes, whether for foreign branches or Bazaar repositories using
153
different storage methods.
155
Most of the commit should occur during a single lockstep iteration across
156
the workingtree and parent trees. The WorkingTree interface needs to
157
provide methods that give commit all it needs. Some of these methods
158
(such as answering the file's last change revision) may be deprecated in
159
newer working trees and there we have a choice of either calculating the
160
value from the data that is present, or refusing to support commit to
163
For a dirstate tree the iteration of changes from the parent can easily be
164
done within its own iter_changes.
166
XXX: We currently don't support selective-file commit of a merge; this
167
could be done if we decide how it should be recorded - is this to be
168
stored as an overall merge revision; as a preliminary non-merge revisions;
169
or will the per-file graph diverge from the revision graph.
171
Other things commit needs to do:
173
* check if there are any conflicts in the tree - if so, commit cannot
176
* check if there are any unknown files, if --strict or automatic add is
179
* check the working tree basis version is up to date with the branch tip
181
* when automatically adding new files or deleting missing files during
182
commit, they must be noted during commit and written into the working
185
* refuse "pointless" commits with no file changes - should be easy by
186
just refusing to do the final step of storing a new overall inventory
189
* heuristic detection of renames between add and delete (out of scope for
192
* pushing changes to a master branch if any
194
* running hooks, pre and post commit
196
* prompting for a commit message if necessary, including a list of the
197
changes that have already been observed
199
* if there are tree references and recursing into them is enabled, then
202
Updates that need to be made in the working tree, either on conclusion
203
of commit or during the scan, include
205
* Changes made to the tree shape, including automatic adds, renames or
208
* For trees (eg dirstate) that cache parent inventories, the old parent
209
information must be removed and the new one inserted
211
* The tree hashcache information should be updated to reflect the stat
212
value at which the file was the same as the committed version. This
213
needs to be done carefully to prevent inconsistencies if the file is
214
modified during or shortly after the commit. Perhaps it would work to
215
read the mtime of the file before we read its text to commit.
217
Dirstate inventories may be most easily updated in a single operation at
218
the end; however it may be best to accumulate data as we proceed through
219
the tree rather than revisiting it at the end.
221
Showing a progress bar for commit may not be necessary if we report files
222
as they are committed. Alternatively we could transiently show a progress
223
bar for each directory that's scanned, even if no changes are observed.
225
This needs to collect a list of added/changed/removed files, each of which
226
must have its text stored (if any) and containing directory updated. This
227
can be done by calling Tree._iter_changes on the source tree, asking for
230
In the 0.17 model the commit operation needs to know the per-file parents
231
and per-file last-changed revision.
233
XXX: If we want to retain explicitly stored per-file graphs, it would seem
234
that we do need to record per-file parents. We have not yet finally
235
settled that we do want to remove them or treat them as a cache. This api
236
stack is still ok whether we do or not, but the internals of it may
239
(In this and other operations we must avoid having multiple layers walk
240
over the tree separately. For example, it is no good to have the Command
241
layer walk the tree to generate a list of all file ids to commit, because
242
the tree will also be walked later. The layers that do need to operate
243
per-file should probably be bound together in a per-dirblock iterator,
244
rather than each iterating independently.)