1
============================
2
Guidelines for modifying bzr
3
============================
7
7
(The current version of this document is available in the file ``HACKING``
8
in the source tree, or at http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/current/hacking.html)
8
in the source tree, or at http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/hacking.html)
14
Exploring the Bazaar Platform
15
=============================
17
Before making changes, it's a good idea to explore the work already
18
done by others. Perhaps the new feature or improvement you're looking
19
for is available in another plug-in already? If you find a bug,
20
perhaps someone else has already fixed it?
22
To answer these questions and more, take a moment to explore the
23
overall Bazaar Platform. Here are some links to browse:
25
* The Plugins page on the Wiki - http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrPlugins
27
* The Bazaar product family on Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/bazaar
29
* Bug Tracker for the core product - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/
31
* Blueprint Tracker for the core product - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/bzr/
33
If nothing else, perhaps you'll find inspiration in how other developers
34
have solved their challenges.
37
Planning and Discussing Changes
38
===============================
40
There is a very active community around Bazaar. Mostly we meet on IRC
41
(#bzr on irc.freenode.net) and on the mailing list. To join the Bazaar
42
community, see http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrSupport.
44
If you are planning to make a change, it's a very good idea to mention it
45
on the IRC channel and/or on the mailing list. There are many advantages
46
to involving the community before you spend much time on a change.
49
* you get to build on the wisdom on others, saving time
51
* if others can direct you to similar code, it minimises the work to be done
53
* it assists everyone in coordinating direction, priorities and effort.
55
In summary, maximising the input from others typically minimises the
56
total effort required to get your changes merged. The community is
57
friendly, helpful and always keen to welcome newcomers.
60
Bazaar Development in a Nutshell
61
================================
63
Looking for a 10 minute introduction to submitting a change?
64
See http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrGivingBack.
66
TODO: Merge that Wiki page into this document.
69
Understanding the Development Process
70
=====================================
72
The development team follows many best-practices including:
74
* a public roadmap and planning process in which anyone can participate
76
* time based milestones everyone can work towards and plan around
78
* extensive code review and feedback to contributors
80
* complete and rigorous test coverage on any code contributed
82
* automated validation that all tests still pass before code is merged
83
into the main code branch.
85
The key tools we use to enable these practices are:
87
* Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/
89
* Bazaar - http://bazaar-vcs.org/
91
* Bundle Buggy - http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/
93
* Patch Queue Manager - https://launchpad.net/pqm/
95
For further information, see http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrDevelopment.
98
A Closer Look at the Merge & Review Process
99
===========================================
101
If you'd like to propose a change, please post to the
102
bazaar@lists.canonical.com list with a bundle, patch, or link to a
103
branch. Put '[PATCH]' or '[MERGE]' in the subject so Bundle Buggy
104
can pick it out, and explain the change in the email message text.
105
Remember to update the NEWS file as part of your change if it makes any
106
changes visible to users or plugin developers. Please include a diff
107
against mainline if you're giving a link to a branch.
109
You can generate a bundle like this:
111
bzr bundle > mybundle.patch
113
A .patch extension is recommended instead of .bundle as many mail clients
114
will send the latter as a binary file. If a bundle would be too long or your
115
mailer mangles whitespace (e.g. implicitly converts Unix newlines to DOS
116
newlines), use the merge-directive command instead like this:
118
bzr merge-directive http://bazaar-vcs.org http://example.org/my_branch > my_directive.patch
120
See the help for details on the arguments to merge-directive.
122
Please do **NOT** put [PATCH] or [MERGE] in the subject line if you don't
123
want it to be merged. If you want comments from developers rather than
124
to be merged, you can put '[RFC]' in the subject line.
126
Anyone is welcome to review code. There are broadly three gates for
129
* Doesn't reduce test coverage: if it adds new methods or commands,
130
there should be tests for them. There is a good test framework
131
and plenty of examples to crib from, but if you are having trouble
132
working out how to test something feel free to post a draft patch
135
* Doesn't reduce design clarity, such as by entangling objects
136
we're trying to separate. This is mostly something the more
137
experienced reviewers need to help check.
139
* Improves bugs, features, speed, or code simplicity.
141
Code that goes in should pass all three. The core developers take care
142
to keep the code quality high and understandable while recognising that
143
perfect is sometimes the enemy of good. (It is easy for reviews to make
144
people notice other things which should be fixed but those things should
145
not hold up the original fix being accepted. New things can easily be
146
recorded in the Bug Tracker instead.)
148
Anyone can "vote" on the mailing list. Core developers can also vote using
149
Bundle Buggy. Here are the voting codes and their explanations.
151
-1 really don't want it in current form
152
-0 somewhat uncomfortable
153
+0 comfortable but resubmission after changes requested
154
+1 conditional good to go after some minor changes
157
+1 conditional is used as a way to avoid another submit/review cycle for
158
patches that need small changes.
160
If a change gets two +1 votes from core reviewers, and no
161
vetos, then it's OK to come in. Any of the core developers can bring it
162
into the bzr.dev trunk and backport it to maintenance branches if required.
163
The Release Manager will merge the change into the branch for a pending
164
release, if any. As a guideline, core developers usually merge their own
165
changes and volunteer to merge other contributions if they were the second
166
reviewer to agree to a change.
168
To track the progress of proposed changes, use Bundle Buggy. See
169
http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/help for a link to all the
170
outstanding merge requests together with an explanation of the columns.
171
Bundle Buggy will also mail you a link to track just your change.
174
Preparing a Sandbox for Making Changes to Bazaar
175
================================================
177
Bazaar supports many ways of organising your work. See
178
http://bazaar-vcs.org/SharedRepositoryLayouts for a summary of the
179
popular alternatives.
181
Of course, the best choice for you will depend on numerous factors:
182
the number of changes you may be making, the complexity of the changes, etc.
183
As a starting suggestion though:
185
* create a local copy of the main development branch (bzr.dev) by using
186
this command: bzr branch http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev/ bzr.dev
188
* keep your copy of bzr.dev prestine (by not developing in it) and keep
189
it up to date (by using bzr pull)
191
* create a new branch off your local bzr.dev copy for each issue
192
(bug or feature) you are working on.
194
This approach makes it easy to go back and make any required changes
195
after a code review. Resubmitting the change is then simple with no
196
risk of accidentially including edits related to other issues you may
197
be working on. After the changes for an issue are accepted and merged,
198
the associated branch can be deleted or archived as you wish.
201
Navigating the Code Base
202
========================
204
TODO: List and describe in one line the purpose of each directory
205
inside an installation of bzr.
207
TODO: Refer to a central location holding an up to date copy of the API
208
documentation generated by epydoc, e.g. something like
209
http://starship.python.net/crew/mwh/bzrlibapi/bzrlib.html.
215
The Importance of Testing
216
=========================
218
Reliability is a critical success factor for any Version Control System.
219
We want Bazaar to be highly reliable across multiple platforms while
220
evolving over time to meet the needs of its community.
222
In a nutshell, this is want we expect and encourage:
13
224
* New functionality should have test cases. Preferably write the
14
225
test before writing the code.
16
227
In general, you can test at either the command-line level or the
17
228
internal API level. See Writing Tests below for more detail.
19
* Try to practice Test-Driven Development. before fixing a bug, write a
230
* Try to practice Test-Driven Development: before fixing a bug, write a
20
231
test case so that it does not regress. Similarly for adding a new
21
232
feature: write a test case for a small version of the new feature before
22
233
starting on the code itself. Check the test fails on the old code, then
23
234
add the feature or fix and check it passes.
25
* Exceptions should be defined inside bzrlib.errors, so that we can
26
see the whole tree at a glance.
28
* Imports should be done at the top-level of the file, unless there is
29
a strong reason to have them lazily loaded when a particular
30
function runs. Import statements have a cost, so try to make sure
31
they don't run inside hot functions.
33
* Module names should always be given fully-qualified,
34
i.e. ``bzrlib.hashcache`` not just ``hashcache``.
36
* Commands should return non-zero when they encounter circumstances that
37
the user should really pay attention to - which includes trivial shell
40
Recommended values are
42
1. Conflicts in merge-like operations, or changes are present in
44
2. Unrepresentable diff changes (i.e. binary files that we cannot show
46
3. An error or exception has occurred.
236
By doing these things, the Bazaar team gets increased confidence that
237
changes do what they claim to do, whether provided by the core team or
238
by community members. Equally importantly, we can be surer that changes
239
down the track do not break new features or bug fixes that you are
242
As of May 2007, Bazaar ships with a test suite containing over 6000 tests
243
and growing. We are proud of it and want to remain so. As community
244
members, we all benefit from it. Would you trust version control on
245
your project to a product *without* a test suite like Bazaar has?
248
Running the Test Suite
249
======================
251
Currently, bzr selftest is used to invoke tests.
252
You can provide a pattern argument to run a subset. For example,
253
to run just the blackbox tests, run::
255
./bzr selftest -v blackbox
257
To skip a particular test (or set of tests), use the --exclude option
258
(shorthand -x) like so::
260
./bzr selftest -v -x blackbox
262
To list tests without running them, use the --list-only option like so::
264
./bzr selftest --list-only
266
This option can be combined with other selftest options (like -x) and
267
filter patterns to understand their effect.
273
In general tests should be placed in a file named test_FOO.py where
274
FOO is the logical thing under test. That file should be placed in the
275
tests subdirectory under the package being tested.
277
For example, tests for merge3 in bzrlib belong in bzrlib/tests/test_merge3.py.
278
See bzrlib/tests/test_sampler.py for a template test script.
280
Tests can be written for the UI or for individual areas of the library.
281
Choose whichever is appropriate: if adding a new command, or a new command
282
option, then you should be writing a UI test. If you are both adding UI
283
functionality and library functionality, you will want to write tests for
284
both the UI and the core behaviours. We call UI tests 'blackbox' tests
285
and they are found in ``bzrlib/tests/blackbox/*.py``.
287
When writing blackbox tests please honour the following conventions:
289
1. Place the tests for the command 'name' in
290
bzrlib/tests/blackbox/test_name.py. This makes it easy for developers
291
to locate the test script for a faulty command.
293
2. Use the 'self.run_bzr("name")' utility function to invoke the command
294
rather than running bzr in a subprocess or invoking the
295
cmd_object.run() method directly. This is a lot faster than
296
subprocesses and generates the same logging output as running it in a
297
subprocess (which invoking the method directly does not).
299
3. Only test the one command in a single test script. Use the bzrlib
300
library when setting up tests and when evaluating the side-effects of
301
the command. We do this so that the library api has continual pressure
302
on it to be as functional as the command line in a simple manner, and
303
to isolate knock-on effects throughout the blackbox test suite when a
304
command changes its name or signature. Ideally only the tests for a
305
given command are affected when a given command is changed.
307
4. If you have a test which does actually require running bzr in a
308
subprocess you can use ``run_bzr_subprocess``. By default the spawned
309
process will not load plugins unless ``--allow-plugins`` is supplied.
315
We make selective use of doctests__. In general they should provide
316
*examples* within the API documentation which can incidentally be tested. We
317
don't try to test every important case using doctests -- regular Python
318
tests are generally a better solution.
320
Most of these are in ``bzrlib/doc/api``. More additions are welcome.
322
__ http://docs.python.org/lib/module-doctest.html
325
Skipping tests and test requirements
326
------------------------------------
328
In our enhancements to unittest we allow for some addition results beyond
329
just success or failure.
331
If a test can't be run, it can say that it's skipped. This is typically
332
used in parameterized tests - for example if a transport doesn't support
333
setting permissions, we'll skip the tests that relating to that. ::
336
return self.branch_format.initialize(repo.bzrdir)
337
except errors.UninitializableFormat:
338
raise tests.TestSkipped('Uninitializable branch format')
340
Raising TestSkipped is a good idea when you want to make it clear that the
341
test was not run, rather than just returning which makes it look as if it
344
A subtly different case is a test that should run, but can't run in the
345
current environment. This covers tests that can only run in particular
346
operating systems or locales, or that depend on external libraries. Here
347
we want to inform the user that they didn't get full test coverage, but
348
they possibly could if they installed more libraries. These are expressed
349
as a dependency on a feature so we can summarise them, and so that the
350
test for the feature is done only once. (For historical reasons, as of
351
May 2007 many cases that should depend on features currently raise
352
TestSkipped.) The typical use is::
354
class TestStrace(TestCaseWithTransport):
356
_test_needs_features = [StraceFeature]
358
which means all tests in this class need the feature. The feature itself
359
should provide a ``_probe`` method which is called once to determine if
366
Known failures are when a test exists but we know it currently doesn't
367
work, allowing the test suite to still pass. These should be used with
368
care, we don't want a proliferation of quietly broken tests. It might be
369
appropriate to use them if you've committed a test for a bug but not the
370
fix for it, or if something works on Unix but not on Windows.
374
Essential Domain Classes
375
########################
377
Introducing the Object Model
378
============================
380
The core domain objects within the bazaar model are:
390
Transports are explained below. See http://bazaar-vcs.org/Classes/
391
for an introduction to the other key classes.
396
The ``Transport`` layer handles access to local or remote directories.
397
Each Transport object acts like a logical connection to a particular
398
directory, and it allows various operations on files within it. You can
399
*clone* a transport to get a new Transport connected to a subdirectory or
402
Transports are not used for access to the working tree. At present
403
working trees are always local and they are accessed through the regular
404
Python file io mechanisms.
409
Transports work in URLs. Take note that URLs are by definition only
410
ASCII - the decision of how to encode a Unicode string into a URL must be
411
taken at a higher level, typically in the Store. (Note that Stores also
412
escape filenames which cannot be safely stored on all filesystems, but
413
this is a different level.)
415
The main reason for this is that it's not possible to safely roundtrip a
416
URL into Unicode and then back into the same URL. The URL standard
417
gives a way to represent non-ASCII bytes in ASCII (as %-escapes), but
418
doesn't say how those bytes represent non-ASCII characters. (They're not
419
guaranteed to be UTF-8 -- that is common but doesn't happen everywhere.)
421
For example if the user enters the url ``http://example/%e0`` there's no
422
way to tell whether that character represents "latin small letter a with
423
grave" in iso-8859-1, or "latin small letter r with acute" in iso-8859-2
424
or malformed UTF-8. So we can't convert their URL to Unicode reliably.
426
Equally problematic if we're given a url-like string containing non-ascii
427
characters (such as the accented a) we can't be sure how to convert that
428
to the correct URL, because we don't know what encoding the server expects
429
for those characters. (Although this is not totally reliable we might still
430
accept these and assume they should be put into UTF-8.)
432
A similar edge case is that the url ``http://foo/sweet%2Fsour`` contains
433
one directory component whose name is "sweet/sour". The escaped slash is
434
not a directory separator. If we try to convert URLs to regular Unicode
435
paths this information will be lost.
437
This implies that Transports must natively deal with URLs; for simplicity
438
they *only* deal with URLs and conversion of other strings to URLs is done
439
elsewhere. Information they return, such as from ``list_dir``, is also in
440
the form of URL components.
51
449
We have a commitment to 6 months API stability - any supported symbol in a
52
450
release of bzr MUST NOT be altered in any way that would result in
72
470
callers will at least get an AttributeError rather than weird results.
75
Standard parameter types
76
------------------------
78
There are some common requirements in the library: some parameters need to be
79
unicode safe, some need byte strings, and so on. At the moment we have
80
only codified one specific pattern: Parameters that need to be unicode
81
should be checked via ``bzrlib.osutils.safe_unicode``. This will coerce the
82
input into unicode in a consistent fashion, allowing trivial strings to be
83
used for programmer convenience, but not performing unpredictably in the
84
presence of different locales.
90
The copyright policy for bzr was recently made clear in this email (edited
91
for grammatical correctness)::
93
The attached patch cleans up the copyright and license statements in
94
the bzr source. It also adds tests to help us remember to add them
95
with the correct text.
97
We had the problem that lots of our files were "Copyright Canonical
98
Development Ltd" which is not a real company, and some other variations
99
on this theme. Also, some files were missing the GPL statements.
101
I want to be clear about the intent of this patch, since copyright can
102
be a little controversial.
104
1) The big motivation for this is not to shut out the community, but
105
just to clean up all of the invalid copyright statements.
107
2) It has been the general policy for bzr that we want a single
108
copyright holder for all of the core code. This is following the model
109
set by the FSF, which makes it easier to update the code to a new
110
license in case problems are encountered. (For example, if we want to
111
upgrade the project universally to GPL v3 it is much simpler if there is
112
a single copyright holder). It also makes it clearer if copyright is
113
ever debated, there is a single holder, which makes it easier to defend
114
in court, etc. (I think the FSF position is that if you assign them
115
copyright, they can defend it in court rather than you needing to, and
116
I'm sure Canonical would do the same).
117
As such, Canonical has requested copyright assignments from all of the
120
3) If someone wants to add code and not attribute it to Canonical, there
121
is a specific list of files that are excluded from this check. And the
122
test failure indicates where that is, and how to update it.
124
4) If anyone feels that I changed a copyright statement incorrectly, just
125
let me know, and I'll be happy to correct it. Whenever you have large
126
mechanical changes like this, it is possible to make some mistakes.
128
Just to reiterate, this is a community project, and it is meant to stay
129
that way. Core bzr code is copyright Canonical for legal reasons, and
130
the tests are just there to help us maintain that.
136
When you change bzrlib, please update the relevant documentation for the
137
change you made: Changes to commands should update their help, and
138
possibly end user tutorials; changes to the core library should be
139
reflected in API documentation.
144
The docstring of a command is used by ``bzr help`` to generate help output
145
for the command. The list 'takes_options' attribute on a command is used by
146
``bzr help`` to document the options for the command - the command
147
docstring does not need to document them. Finally, the '_see_also'
148
attribute on a command can be used to reference other related help topics.
153
If you make a user-visible change, please add a note to the NEWS file.
154
The description should be written to make sense to someone who's just
155
a user of bzr, not a developer: new functions or classes shouldn't be
156
mentioned, but new commands, changes in behaviour or fixed nontrivial
157
bugs should be listed. See the existing entries for an idea of what
160
Within each release, entries in the news file should have the most
161
user-visible changes first. So the order should be approximately:
163
* changes to existing behaviour - the highest priority because the
164
user's existing knowledge is incorrect
165
* new features - should be brought to their attention
166
* bug fixes - may be of interest if the bug was affecting them, and
167
should include the bug number if any
168
* major documentation changes
169
* changes to internal interfaces
171
People who made significant contributions to each change are listed in
172
parenthesis. This can include reporting bugs (particularly with good
173
details or reproduction recipes), submitting patches, etc.
178
Functions, methods, classes and modules should have docstrings
179
describing how they are used.
181
The first line of the docstring should be a self-contained sentence.
183
For the special case of Command classes, this acts as the user-visible
184
documentation shown by the help command.
186
The docstrings should be formatted as reStructuredText_ (like this
187
document), suitable for processing using the epydoc_ tool into HTML
190
.. _reStructuredText: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
191
.. _epydoc: http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/
473
Coding Style Guidelines
474
=======================
198
476
Please write PEP-8__ compliant code.
379
691
should be only in the command-line tool.
385
In general tests should be placed in a file named test_FOO.py where
386
FOO is the logical thing under test. That file should be placed in the
387
tests subdirectory under the package being tested.
389
For example, tests for merge3 in bzrlib belong in bzrlib/tests/test_merge3.py.
390
See bzrlib/tests/test_sampler.py for a template test script.
392
Tests can be written for the UI or for individual areas of the library.
393
Choose whichever is appropriate: if adding a new command, or a new command
394
option, then you should be writing a UI test. If you are both adding UI
395
functionality and library functionality, you will want to write tests for
396
both the UI and the core behaviours. We call UI tests 'blackbox' tests
397
and they are found in ``bzrlib/tests/blackbox/*.py``.
399
When writing blackbox tests please honour the following conventions:
401
1. Place the tests for the command 'name' in
402
bzrlib/tests/blackbox/test_name.py. This makes it easy for developers
403
to locate the test script for a faulty command.
405
2. Use the 'self.run_bzr("name")' utility function to invoke the command
406
rather than running bzr in a subprocess or invoking the
407
cmd_object.run() method directly. This is a lot faster than
408
subprocesses and generates the same logging output as running it in a
409
subprocess (which invoking the method directly does not).
411
3. Only test the one command in a single test script. Use the bzrlib
412
library when setting up tests and when evaluating the side-effects of
413
the command. We do this so that the library api has continual pressure
414
on it to be as functional as the command line in a simple manner, and
415
to isolate knock-on effects throughout the blackbox test suite when a
416
command changes its name or signature. Ideally only the tests for a
417
given command are affected when a given command is changed.
419
4. If you have a test which does actually require running bzr in a
420
subprocess you can use ``run_bzr_subprocess``. By default the spawned
421
process will not load plugins unless ``--allow-plugins`` is supplied.
427
We make selective use of doctests__. In general they should provide
428
*examples* within the API documentation which can incidentally be tested. We
429
don't try to test every important case using doctests -- regular Python
430
tests are generally a better solution.
432
Most of these are in ``bzrlib/doc/api``. More additions are welcome.
434
__ http://docs.python.org/lib/module-doctest.html
438
Skipping tests and test requirements
439
------------------------------------
441
In our enhancements to unittest we allow for some addition results beyond
442
just success or failure.
444
If a test can't be run, it can say that it's skipped. This is typically
445
used in parameterized tests - for example if a transport doesn't support
446
setting permissions, we'll skip the tests that relating to that. ::
449
return self.branch_format.initialize(repo.bzrdir)
450
except errors.UninitializableFormat:
451
raise tests.TestSkipped('Uninitializable branch format')
453
Raising TestSkipped is a good idea when you want to make it clear that the
454
test was not run, rather than just returning which makes it look as if it
457
A subtly different case is a test that should run, but can't run in the
458
current environment. This covers tests that can only run in particular
459
operating systems or locales, or that depend on external libraries. Here
460
we want to inform the user that they didn't get full test coverage, but
461
they possibly could if they installed more libraries. These are expressed
462
as a dependency on a feature so we can summarise them, and so that the
463
test for the feature is done only once. (For historical reasons, as of
464
May 2007 many cases that should depend on features currently raise
465
TestSkipped.) The typical use is::
467
class TestStrace(TestCaseWithTransport):
469
_test_needs_features = [StraceFeature]
471
which means all tests in this class need the feature. The feature itself
472
should provide a ``_probe`` method which is called once to determine if
475
Known failures are when a test exists but we know it currently doesn't
476
work, allowing the test suite to still pass. These should be used with
477
care, we don't want a proliferation of quietly broken tests. It might be
478
appropriate to use them if you've committed a test for a bug but not the
479
fix for it, or if something works on Unix but not on Windows.
484
Currently, bzr selftest is used to invoke tests.
485
You can provide a pattern argument to run a subset. For example,
486
to run just the blackbox tests, run::
488
./bzr selftest -v blackbox
490
To skip a particular test (or set of tests), use the --exclude option
491
(shorthand -x) like so::
493
./bzr selftest -v -x blackbox
495
To list tests without running them, use the --list-only option like so::
497
./bzr selftest --list-only
499
This option can be combined with other selftest options (like -x) and
500
filter patterns to understand their effect.
503
Errors and exceptions
504
=====================
506
Errors are handled through Python exceptions.
694
Handling Errors and Exceptions
695
==============================
697
Commands should return non-zero when they encounter circumstances that
698
the user should really pay attention to - which includes trivial shell
701
Recommended values are:
704
1. Conflicts in merge-like operations, or changes are present in
705
diff-like operations.
706
2. Unrepresentable diff changes (i.e. binary files that we cannot show
708
3. An error or exception has occurred.
710
Errors are handled through Python exceptions. Exceptions should be defined
711
inside bzrlib.errors, so that we can see the whole tree at a glance.
508
713
We broadly classify errors as either being either internal or not,
509
714
depending on whether ``user_error`` is set or not. If we think it's our
537
742
final fullstop. If long, they may contain newlines to break the text.
748
When you change bzrlib, please update the relevant documentation for the
749
change you made: Changes to commands should update their help, and
750
possibly end user tutorials; changes to the core library should be
751
reflected in API documentation.
756
If you make a user-visible change, please add a note to the NEWS file.
757
The description should be written to make sense to someone who's just
758
a user of bzr, not a developer: new functions or classes shouldn't be
759
mentioned, but new commands, changes in behaviour or fixed nontrivial
760
bugs should be listed. See the existing entries for an idea of what
763
Within each release, entries in the news file should have the most
764
user-visible changes first. So the order should be approximately:
766
* changes to existing behaviour - the highest priority because the
767
user's existing knowledge is incorrect
768
* new features - should be brought to their attention
769
* bug fixes - may be of interest if the bug was affecting them, and
770
should include the bug number if any
771
* major documentation changes
772
* changes to internal interfaces
774
People who made significant contributions to each change are listed in
775
parenthesis. This can include reporting bugs (particularly with good
776
details or reproduction recipes), submitting patches, etc.
781
The docstring of a command is used by ``bzr help`` to generate help output
782
for the command. The list 'takes_options' attribute on a command is used by
783
``bzr help`` to document the options for the command - the command
784
docstring does not need to document them. Finally, the '_see_also'
785
attribute on a command can be used to reference other related help topics.
790
Functions, methods, classes and modules should have docstrings
791
describing how they are used.
793
The first line of the docstring should be a self-contained sentence.
795
For the special case of Command classes, this acts as the user-visible
796
documentation shown by the help command.
798
The docstrings should be formatted as reStructuredText_ (like this
799
document), suitable for processing using the epydoc_ tool into HTML
802
.. _reStructuredText: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
803
.. _epydoc: http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/
812
The copyright policy for bzr was recently made clear in this email (edited
813
for grammatical correctness)::
815
The attached patch cleans up the copyright and license statements in
816
the bzr source. It also adds tests to help us remember to add them
817
with the correct text.
819
We had the problem that lots of our files were "Copyright Canonical
820
Development Ltd" which is not a real company, and some other variations
821
on this theme. Also, some files were missing the GPL statements.
823
I want to be clear about the intent of this patch, since copyright can
824
be a little controversial.
826
1) The big motivation for this is not to shut out the community, but
827
just to clean up all of the invalid copyright statements.
829
2) It has been the general policy for bzr that we want a single
830
copyright holder for all of the core code. This is following the model
831
set by the FSF, which makes it easier to update the code to a new
832
license in case problems are encountered. (For example, if we want to
833
upgrade the project universally to GPL v3 it is much simpler if there is
834
a single copyright holder). It also makes it clearer if copyright is
835
ever debated, there is a single holder, which makes it easier to defend
836
in court, etc. (I think the FSF position is that if you assign them
837
copyright, they can defend it in court rather than you needing to, and
838
I'm sure Canonical would do the same).
839
As such, Canonical has requested copyright assignments from all of the
842
3) If someone wants to add code and not attribute it to Canonical, there
843
is a specific list of files that are excluded from this check. And the
844
test failure indicates where that is, and how to update it.
846
4) If anyone feels that I changed a copyright statement incorrectly, just
847
let me know, and I'll be happy to correct it. Whenever you have large
848
mechanical changes like this, it is possible to make some mistakes.
850
Just to reiterate, this is a community project, and it is meant to stay
851
that way. Core bzr code is copyright Canonical for legal reasons, and
852
the tests are just there to help us maintain that.
566
882
indexes into the branch's revision history.
572
The ``Transport`` layer handles access to local or remote directories.
573
Each Transport object acts like a logical connection to a particular
574
directory, and it allows various operations on files within it. You can
575
*clone* a transport to get a new Transport connected to a subdirectory or
578
Transports are not used for access to the working tree. At present
579
working trees are always local and they are accessed through the regular
580
Python file io mechanisms.
585
Transports work in URLs. Take note that URLs are by definition only
586
ASCII - the decision of how to encode a Unicode string into a URL must be
587
taken at a higher level, typically in the Store. (Note that Stores also
588
escape filenames which cannot be safely stored on all filesystems, but
589
this is a different level.)
591
The main reason for this is that it's not possible to safely roundtrip a
592
URL into Unicode and then back into the same URL. The URL standard
593
gives a way to represent non-ASCII bytes in ASCII (as %-escapes), but
594
doesn't say how those bytes represent non-ASCII characters. (They're not
595
guaranteed to be UTF-8 -- that is common but doesn't happen everywhere.)
597
For example if the user enters the url ``http://example/%e0`` there's no
598
way to tell whether that character represents "latin small letter a with
599
grave" in iso-8859-1, or "latin small letter r with acute" in iso-8859-2
600
or malformed UTF-8. So we can't convert their URL to Unicode reliably.
602
Equally problematic if we're given a url-like string containing non-ascii
603
characters (such as the accented a) we can't be sure how to convert that
604
to the correct URL, because we don't know what encoding the server expects
605
for those characters. (Although this is not totally reliable we might still
606
accept these and assume they should be put into UTF-8.)
608
A similar edge case is that the url ``http://foo/sweet%2Fsour`` contains
609
one directory component whose name is "sweet/sour". The escaped slash is
610
not a directory separator. If we try to convert URLs to regular Unicode
611
paths this information will be lost.
613
This implies that Transports must natively deal with URLs; for simplicity
614
they *only* deal with URLs and conversion of other strings to URLs is done
615
elsewhere. Information they return, such as from ``list_dir``, is also in
616
the form of URL components.
619
885
Unicode and Encoding Support
620
886
============================
682
948
Use ``bzrlib.osutils.rmtree`` instead.
688
If you'd like to propose a change, please post to the
689
bazaar@lists.canonical.com list with a patch, bzr changeset, or link to a
690
branch. Please put '[patch]' in the subject so we can pick them out, and
691
include some text explaining the change. Remember to put an update to the NEWS
692
file in your diff, if it makes any changes visible to users or plugin
693
developers. Please include a diff against mainline if you're giving a link to
696
Please indicate if you think the code is ready to merge, or if it's just a
697
draft or for discussion. If you want comments from many developers rather than
698
to be merged, you can put '[rfc]' in the subject lines.
700
Anyone is welcome to review code. There are broadly three gates for
703
* Doesn't reduce test coverage: if it adds new methods or commands,
704
there should be tests for them. There is a good test framework
705
and plenty of examples to crib from, but if you are having trouble
706
working out how to test something feel free to post a draft patch
709
* Doesn't reduce design clarity, such as by entangling objects
710
we're trying to separate. This is mostly something the more
711
experienced reviewers need to help check.
713
* Improves bugs, features, speed, or code simplicity.
715
Code that goes in should pass all three.
717
If you read a patch please reply and say so. We can use a numeric scale
718
of -1, -0, +0, +1, meaning respectively "really don't want it in current
719
form", "somewhat uncomfortable", "ok with me", and "please put it in".
720
Anyone can "vote". (It's not really voting, just a terse expression.)
722
If something gets say two +1 votes from core reviewers, and no
723
vetos, then it's OK to come in. Any of the core developers can bring it
724
into their integration branch, which I'll merge regularly. (If you do
725
so, please reply and say so.)
728
951
C Extension Modules
729
952
===================