1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
|
# Copyright (C) 2005-2011 Canonical Ltd
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
import os
from bzrlib import (
bzrdir,
conflicts,
errors,
option,
osutils,
tests,
)
from bzrlib.tests import (
script,
scenarios,
)
load_tests = scenarios.load_tests_apply_scenarios
# TODO: Test commit with some added, and added-but-missing files
# RBC 20060124 is that not tested in test_commit.py ?
# The order of 'path' here is important - do not let it
# be a sorted list.
# u'\xe5' == a with circle
# '\xc3\xae' == u'\xee' == i with hat
# So these are u'path' and 'id' only with a circle and a hat. (shappo?)
example_conflicts = conflicts.ConflictList(
[conflicts.MissingParent('Not deleting', u'p\xe5thg', '\xc3\xaedg'),
conflicts.ContentsConflict(u'p\xe5tha', None, '\xc3\xaeda'),
conflicts.TextConflict(u'p\xe5tha'),
conflicts.PathConflict(u'p\xe5thb', u'p\xe5thc', '\xc3\xaedb'),
conflicts.DuplicateID('Unversioned existing file',
u'p\xe5thc', u'p\xe5thc2',
'\xc3\xaedc', '\xc3\xaedc'),
conflicts.DuplicateEntry('Moved existing file to',
u'p\xe5thdd.moved', u'p\xe5thd',
'\xc3\xaedd', None),
conflicts.ParentLoop('Cancelled move', u'p\xe5the', u'p\xe5th2e',
None, '\xc3\xaed2e'),
conflicts.UnversionedParent('Versioned directory',
u'p\xe5thf', '\xc3\xaedf'),
conflicts.NonDirectoryParent('Created directory',
u'p\xe5thg', '\xc3\xaedg'),
])
class TestConflicts(tests.TestCaseWithTransport):
def test_resolve_conflict_dir(self):
tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('.')
self.build_tree_contents([('hello', 'hello world4'),
('hello.THIS', 'hello world2'),
('hello.BASE', 'hello world1'),
])
os.mkdir('hello.OTHER')
tree.add('hello', 'q')
l = conflicts.ConflictList([conflicts.TextConflict('hello')])
l.remove_files(tree)
def test_select_conflicts(self):
tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('.')
clist = conflicts.ConflictList
def check_select(not_selected, selected, paths, **kwargs):
self.assertEqual(
(not_selected, selected),
tree_conflicts.select_conflicts(tree, paths, **kwargs))
foo = conflicts.ContentsConflict('foo')
bar = conflicts.ContentsConflict('bar')
tree_conflicts = clist([foo, bar])
check_select(clist([bar]), clist([foo]), ['foo'])
check_select(clist(), tree_conflicts,
[''], ignore_misses=True, recurse=True)
foobaz = conflicts.ContentsConflict('foo/baz')
tree_conflicts = clist([foobaz, bar])
check_select(clist([bar]), clist([foobaz]),
['foo'], ignore_misses=True, recurse=True)
qux = conflicts.PathConflict('qux', 'foo/baz')
tree_conflicts = clist([qux])
check_select(clist(), tree_conflicts,
['foo'], ignore_misses=True, recurse=True)
check_select (tree_conflicts, clist(), ['foo'], ignore_misses=True)
def test_resolve_conflicts_recursive(self):
tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('.')
self.build_tree(['dir/', 'dir/hello'])
tree.add(['dir', 'dir/hello'])
dirhello = conflicts.ConflictList([conflicts.TextConflict('dir/hello')])
tree.set_conflicts(dirhello)
conflicts.resolve(tree, ['dir'], recursive=False, ignore_misses=True)
self.assertEqual(dirhello, tree.conflicts())
conflicts.resolve(tree, ['dir'], recursive=True, ignore_misses=True)
self.assertEqual(conflicts.ConflictList([]), tree.conflicts())
class TestConflictStanzas(tests.TestCase):
def test_stanza_roundtrip(self):
# write and read our example stanza.
stanza_iter = example_conflicts.to_stanzas()
processed = conflicts.ConflictList.from_stanzas(stanza_iter)
for o, p in zip(processed, example_conflicts):
self.assertEqual(o, p)
self.assertIsInstance(o.path, unicode)
if o.file_id is not None:
self.assertIsInstance(o.file_id, str)
conflict_path = getattr(o, 'conflict_path', None)
if conflict_path is not None:
self.assertIsInstance(conflict_path, unicode)
conflict_file_id = getattr(o, 'conflict_file_id', None)
if conflict_file_id is not None:
self.assertIsInstance(conflict_file_id, str)
def test_stanzification(self):
for stanza in example_conflicts.to_stanzas():
if 'file_id' in stanza:
# In Stanza form, the file_id has to be unicode.
self.assertStartsWith(stanza['file_id'], u'\xeed')
self.assertStartsWith(stanza['path'], u'p\xe5th')
if 'conflict_path' in stanza:
self.assertStartsWith(stanza['conflict_path'], u'p\xe5th')
if 'conflict_file_id' in stanza:
self.assertStartsWith(stanza['conflict_file_id'], u'\xeed')
# FIXME: The shell-like tests should be converted to real whitebox tests... or
# moved to a blackbox module -- vila 20100205
# FIXME: test missing for multiple conflicts
# FIXME: Tests missing for DuplicateID conflict type
class TestResolveConflicts(script.TestCaseWithTransportAndScript):
preamble = None # The setup script set by daughter classes
def setUp(self):
super(TestResolveConflicts, self).setUp()
self.run_script(self.preamble)
def mirror_scenarios(base_scenarios):
"""Return a list of mirrored scenarios.
Each scenario in base_scenarios is duplicated switching the roles of 'this'
and 'other'
"""
scenarios = []
for common, (lname, ldict), (rname, rdict) in base_scenarios:
a = tests.multiply_scenarios([(lname, dict(_this=ldict))],
[(rname, dict(_other=rdict))])
b = tests.multiply_scenarios([(rname, dict(_this=rdict))],
[(lname, dict(_other=ldict))])
# Inject the common parameters in all scenarios
for name, d in a + b:
d.update(common)
scenarios.extend(a + b)
return scenarios
# FIXME: Get rid of parametrized (in the class name) once we delete
# TestResolveConflicts -- vila 20100308
class TestParametrizedResolveConflicts(tests.TestCaseWithTransport):
"""This class provides a base to test single conflict resolution.
Since all conflict objects are created with specific semantics for their
attributes, each class should implement the necessary functions and
attributes described below.
Each class should define the scenarios that create the expected (single)
conflict.
Each scenario describes:
* how to create 'base' tree (and revision)
* how to create 'left' tree (and revision, parent rev 'base')
* how to create 'right' tree (and revision, parent rev 'base')
* how to check that changes in 'base'->'left' have been taken
* how to check that changes in 'base'->'right' have been taken
From each base scenario, we generate two concrete scenarios where:
* this=left, other=right
* this=right, other=left
Then the test case verifies each concrete scenario by:
* creating a branch containing the 'base', 'this' and 'other' revisions
* creating a working tree for the 'this' revision
* performing the merge of 'other' into 'this'
* verifying the expected conflict was generated
* resolving with --take-this or --take-other, and running the corresponding
checks (for either 'base'->'this', or 'base'->'other')
:cvar _conflict_type: The expected class of the generated conflict.
:cvar _assert_conflict: A method receiving the working tree and the
conflict object and checking its attributes.
:cvar _base_actions: The branchbuilder actions to create the 'base'
revision.
:cvar _this: The dict related to 'base' -> 'this'. It contains at least:
* 'actions': The branchbuilder actions to create the 'this'
revision.
* 'check': how to check the changes after resolution with --take-this.
:cvar _other: The dict related to 'base' -> 'other'. It contains at least:
* 'actions': The branchbuilder actions to create the 'other'
revision.
* 'check': how to check the changes after resolution with --take-other.
"""
# Set by daughter classes
_conflict_type = None
_assert_conflict = None
# Set by load_tests
_base_actions = None
_this = None
_other = None
scenarios = []
"""The scenario list for the conflict type defined by the class.
Each scenario is of the form:
(common, (left_name, left_dict), (right_name, right_dict))
* common is a dict
* left_name and right_name are the scenario names that will be combined
* left_dict and right_dict are the attributes specific to each half of
the scenario. They should include at least 'actions' and 'check' and
will be available as '_this' and '_other' test instance attributes.
Daughters classes are free to add their specific attributes as they see
fit in any of the three dicts.
This is a class method so that load_tests can find it.
'_base_actions' in the common dict, 'actions' and 'check' in the left
and right dicts use names that map to methods in the test classes. Some
prefixes are added to these names to get the correspong methods (see
_get_actions() and _get_check()). The motivation here is to avoid
collisions in the class namespace.
"""
def setUp(self):
super(TestParametrizedResolveConflicts, self).setUp()
builder = self.make_branch_builder('trunk')
builder.start_series()
# Create an empty trunk
builder.build_snapshot('start', None, [
('add', ('', 'root-id', 'directory', ''))])
# Add a minimal base content
base_actions = self._get_actions(self._base_actions)()
builder.build_snapshot('base', ['start'], base_actions)
# Modify the base content in branch
actions_other = self._get_actions(self._other['actions'])()
builder.build_snapshot('other', ['base'], actions_other)
# Modify the base content in trunk
actions_this = self._get_actions(self._this['actions'])()
builder.build_snapshot('this', ['base'], actions_this)
# builder.get_branch() tip is now 'this'
builder.finish_series()
self.builder = builder
def _get_actions(self, name):
return getattr(self, 'do_%s' % name)
def _get_check(self, name):
return getattr(self, 'check_%s' % name)
def _merge_other_into_this(self):
b = self.builder.get_branch()
wt = b.bzrdir.sprout('branch').open_workingtree()
wt.merge_from_branch(b, 'other')
return wt
def assertConflict(self, wt):
confs = wt.conflicts()
self.assertLength(1, confs)
c = confs[0]
self.assertIsInstance(c, self._conflict_type)
self._assert_conflict(wt, c)
def _get_resolve_path_arg(self, wt, action):
raise NotImplementedError(self._get_resolve_path_arg)
def check_resolved(self, wt, action):
path = self._get_resolve_path_arg(wt, action)
conflicts.resolve(wt, [path], action=action)
# Check that we don't have any conflicts nor unknown left
self.assertLength(0, wt.conflicts())
self.assertLength(0, list(wt.unknowns()))
def test_resolve_taking_this(self):
wt = self._merge_other_into_this()
self.assertConflict(wt)
self.check_resolved(wt, 'take_this')
check_this = self._get_check(self._this['check'])
check_this()
def test_resolve_taking_other(self):
wt = self._merge_other_into_this()
self.assertConflict(wt)
self.check_resolved(wt, 'take_other')
check_other = self._get_check(self._other['check'])
check_other()
class TestResolveTextConflicts(TestParametrizedResolveConflicts):
_conflict_type = conflicts.TextConflict
# Set by the scenarios
# path and file-id for the file involved in the conflict
_path = None
_file_id = None
scenarios = mirror_scenarios(
[
# File modified on both sides
(dict(_base_actions='create_file',
_path='file', _file_id='file-id'),
('filed_modified_A',
dict(actions='modify_file_A', check='file_has_content_A')),
('file_modified_B',
dict(actions='modify_file_B', check='file_has_content_B')),),
# File modified on both sides in dir
(dict(_base_actions='create_file_in_dir',
_path='dir/file', _file_id='file-id'),
('filed_modified_A_in_dir',
dict(actions='modify_file_A',
check='file_in_dir_has_content_A')),
('file_modified_B',
dict(actions='modify_file_B',
check='file_in_dir_has_content_B')),),
])
def do_create_file(self, path='file'):
return [('add', (path, 'file-id', 'file', 'trunk content\n'))]
def do_modify_file_A(self):
return [('modify', ('file-id', 'trunk content\nfeature A\n'))]
def do_modify_file_B(self):
return [('modify', ('file-id', 'trunk content\nfeature B\n'))]
def check_file_has_content_A(self, path='file'):
self.assertFileEqual('trunk content\nfeature A\n',
osutils.pathjoin('branch', path))
def check_file_has_content_B(self, path='file'):
self.assertFileEqual('trunk content\nfeature B\n',
osutils.pathjoin('branch', path))
def do_create_file_in_dir(self):
return [('add', ('dir', 'dir-id', 'directory', '')),
] + self.do_create_file('dir/file')
def check_file_in_dir_has_content_A(self):
self.check_file_has_content_A('dir/file')
def check_file_in_dir_has_content_B(self):
self.check_file_has_content_B('dir/file')
def _get_resolve_path_arg(self, wt, action):
return self._path
def assertTextConflict(self, wt, c):
self.assertEqual(self._file_id, c.file_id)
self.assertEqual(self._path, c.path)
_assert_conflict = assertTextConflict
class TestResolveContentsConflict(TestParametrizedResolveConflicts):
_conflict_type = conflicts.ContentsConflict
# Set by the scenarios
# path and file-id for the file involved in the conflict
_path = None
_file_id = None
scenarios = mirror_scenarios(
[
# File modified/deleted
(dict(_base_actions='create_file',
_path='file', _file_id='file-id'),
('file_modified',
dict(actions='modify_file', check='file_has_more_content')),
('file_deleted',
dict(actions='delete_file', check='file_doesnt_exist')),),
# File modified/deleted in dir
(dict(_base_actions='create_file_in_dir',
_path='dir/file', _file_id='file-id'),
('file_modified_in_dir',
dict(actions='modify_file_in_dir',
check='file_in_dir_has_more_content')),
('file_deleted_in_dir',
dict(actions='delete_file',
check='file_in_dir_doesnt_exist')),),
])
def do_create_file(self):
return [('add', ('file', 'file-id', 'file', 'trunk content\n'))]
def do_modify_file(self):
return [('modify', ('file-id', 'trunk content\nmore content\n'))]
def check_file_has_more_content(self):
self.assertFileEqual('trunk content\nmore content\n', 'branch/file')
def do_delete_file(self):
return [('unversion', 'file-id')]
def check_file_doesnt_exist(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/file')
def do_create_file_in_dir(self):
return [('add', ('dir', 'dir-id', 'directory', '')),
('add', ('dir/file', 'file-id', 'file', 'trunk content\n'))]
def do_modify_file_in_dir(self):
return [('modify', ('file-id', 'trunk content\nmore content\n'))]
def check_file_in_dir_has_more_content(self):
self.assertFileEqual('trunk content\nmore content\n', 'branch/dir/file')
def check_file_in_dir_doesnt_exist(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir/file')
def _get_resolve_path_arg(self, wt, action):
return self._path
def assertContentsConflict(self, wt, c):
self.assertEqual(self._file_id, c.file_id)
self.assertEqual(self._path, c.path)
_assert_conflict = assertContentsConflict
class TestResolvePathConflict(TestParametrizedResolveConflicts):
_conflict_type = conflicts.PathConflict
def do_nothing(self):
return []
# Each side dict additionally defines:
# - path path involved (can be '<deleted>')
# - file-id involved
scenarios = mirror_scenarios(
[
# File renamed/deleted
(dict(_base_actions='create_file'),
('file_renamed',
dict(actions='rename_file', check='file_renamed',
path='new-file', file_id='file-id')),
('file_deleted',
dict(actions='delete_file', check='file_doesnt_exist',
# PathConflicts deletion handling requires a special
# hard-coded value
path='<deleted>', file_id='file-id')),),
# File renamed/deleted in dir
(dict(_base_actions='create_file_in_dir'),
('file_renamed_in_dir',
dict(actions='rename_file_in_dir', check='file_in_dir_renamed',
path='dir/new-file', file_id='file-id')),
('file_deleted',
dict(actions='delete_file', check='file_in_dir_doesnt_exist',
# PathConflicts deletion handling requires a special
# hard-coded value
path='<deleted>', file_id='file-id')),),
# File renamed/renamed differently
(dict(_base_actions='create_file'),
('file_renamed',
dict(actions='rename_file', check='file_renamed',
path='new-file', file_id='file-id')),
('file_renamed2',
dict(actions='rename_file2', check='file_renamed2',
path='new-file2', file_id='file-id')),),
# Dir renamed/deleted
(dict(_base_actions='create_dir'),
('dir_renamed',
dict(actions='rename_dir', check='dir_renamed',
path='new-dir', file_id='dir-id')),
('dir_deleted',
dict(actions='delete_dir', check='dir_doesnt_exist',
# PathConflicts deletion handling requires a special
# hard-coded value
path='<deleted>', file_id='dir-id')),),
# Dir renamed/renamed differently
(dict(_base_actions='create_dir'),
('dir_renamed',
dict(actions='rename_dir', check='dir_renamed',
path='new-dir', file_id='dir-id')),
('dir_renamed2',
dict(actions='rename_dir2', check='dir_renamed2',
path='new-dir2', file_id='dir-id')),),
])
def do_create_file(self):
return [('add', ('file', 'file-id', 'file', 'trunk content\n'))]
def do_create_dir(self):
return [('add', ('dir', 'dir-id', 'directory', ''))]
def do_rename_file(self):
return [('rename', ('file', 'new-file'))]
def check_file_renamed(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/file')
self.assertPathExists('branch/new-file')
def do_rename_file2(self):
return [('rename', ('file', 'new-file2'))]
def check_file_renamed2(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/file')
self.assertPathExists('branch/new-file2')
def do_rename_dir(self):
return [('rename', ('dir', 'new-dir'))]
def check_dir_renamed(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir')
self.assertPathExists('branch/new-dir')
def do_rename_dir2(self):
return [('rename', ('dir', 'new-dir2'))]
def check_dir_renamed2(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir')
self.assertPathExists('branch/new-dir2')
def do_delete_file(self):
return [('unversion', 'file-id')]
def check_file_doesnt_exist(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/file')
def do_delete_dir(self):
return [('unversion', 'dir-id')]
def check_dir_doesnt_exist(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir')
def do_create_file_in_dir(self):
return [('add', ('dir', 'dir-id', 'directory', '')),
('add', ('dir/file', 'file-id', 'file', 'trunk content\n'))]
def do_rename_file_in_dir(self):
return [('rename', ('dir/file', 'dir/new-file'))]
def check_file_in_dir_renamed(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir/file')
self.assertPathExists('branch/dir/new-file')
def check_file_in_dir_doesnt_exist(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir/file')
def _get_resolve_path_arg(self, wt, action):
tpath = self._this['path']
opath = self._other['path']
if tpath == '<deleted>':
path = opath
else:
path = tpath
return path
def assertPathConflict(self, wt, c):
tpath = self._this['path']
tfile_id = self._this['file_id']
opath = self._other['path']
ofile_id = self._other['file_id']
self.assertEqual(tfile_id, ofile_id) # Sanity check
self.assertEqual(tfile_id, c.file_id)
self.assertEqual(tpath, c.path)
self.assertEqual(opath, c.conflict_path)
_assert_conflict = assertPathConflict
class TestResolvePathConflictBefore531967(TestResolvePathConflict):
"""Same as TestResolvePathConflict but a specific conflict object.
"""
def assertPathConflict(self, c):
# We create a conflict object as it was created before the fix and
# inject it into the working tree, the test will exercise the
# compatibility code.
old_c = conflicts.PathConflict('<deleted>', self._item_path,
file_id=None)
wt.set_conflicts(conflicts.ConflictList([old_c]))
class TestResolveDuplicateEntry(TestParametrizedResolveConflicts):
_conflict_type = conflicts.DuplicateEntry
scenarios = mirror_scenarios(
[
# File created with different file-ids
(dict(_base_actions='nothing'),
('filea_created',
dict(actions='create_file_a', check='file_content_a',
path='file', file_id='file-a-id')),
('fileb_created',
dict(actions='create_file_b', check='file_content_b',
path='file', file_id='file-b-id')),),
])
def do_nothing(self):
return []
def do_create_file_a(self):
return [('add', ('file', 'file-a-id', 'file', 'file a content\n'))]
def check_file_content_a(self):
self.assertFileEqual('file a content\n', 'branch/file')
def do_create_file_b(self):
return [('add', ('file', 'file-b-id', 'file', 'file b content\n'))]
def check_file_content_b(self):
self.assertFileEqual('file b content\n', 'branch/file')
def _get_resolve_path_arg(self, wt, action):
return self._this['path']
def assertDuplicateEntry(self, wt, c):
tpath = self._this['path']
tfile_id = self._this['file_id']
opath = self._other['path']
ofile_id = self._other['file_id']
self.assertEqual(tpath, opath) # Sanity check
self.assertEqual(tfile_id, c.file_id)
self.assertEqual(tpath + '.moved', c.path)
self.assertEqual(tpath, c.conflict_path)
_assert_conflict = assertDuplicateEntry
class TestResolveUnversionedParent(TestResolveConflicts):
# FIXME: Add the reverse tests: dir deleted in trunk, file added in branch
# FIXME: While this *creates* UnversionedParent conflicts, this really only
# tests MissingParent resolution :-/
preamble = """
$ bzr init trunk
...
$ cd trunk
$ mkdir dir
$ bzr add -q dir
$ bzr commit -m 'Create trunk' -q
$ echo 'trunk content' >dir/file
$ bzr add -q dir/file
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Add dir/file in trunk'
$ bzr branch -q . -r 1 ../branch
$ cd ../branch
$ bzr rm dir -q
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Remove dir in branch'
$ bzr merge ../trunk
2>+N dir/
2>+N dir/file
2>Conflict adding files to dir. Created directory.
2>Conflict because dir is not versioned, but has versioned children. Versioned directory.
2>2 conflicts encountered.
"""
def test_take_this(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr rm -q dir --force
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_take_other(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
class TestResolveMissingParent(TestResolveConflicts):
preamble = """
$ bzr init trunk
...
$ cd trunk
$ mkdir dir
$ echo 'trunk content' >dir/file
$ bzr add -q
$ bzr commit -m 'Create trunk' -q
$ echo 'trunk content' >dir/file2
$ bzr add -q dir/file2
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Add dir/file2 in branch'
$ bzr branch -q . -r 1 ../branch
$ cd ../branch
$ bzr rm -q dir/file --force
$ bzr rm -q dir
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Remove dir/file'
$ bzr merge ../trunk
2>+N dir/
2>+N dir/file2
2>Conflict adding files to dir. Created directory.
2>Conflict because dir is not versioned, but has versioned children. Versioned directory.
2>2 conflicts encountered.
"""
def test_keep_them_all(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_adopt_child(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr mv -q dir/file2 file2
$ bzr rm -q dir --force
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_kill_them_all(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr rm -q dir --force
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_resolve_taking_this(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve --take-this dir
2>...
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_resolve_taking_other(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve --take-other dir
2>...
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
class TestResolveDeletingParent(TestResolveConflicts):
preamble = """
$ bzr init trunk
...
$ cd trunk
$ mkdir dir
$ echo 'trunk content' >dir/file
$ bzr add -q
$ bzr commit -m 'Create trunk' -q
$ bzr rm -q dir/file --force
$ bzr rm -q dir --force
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Remove dir/file'
$ bzr branch -q . -r 1 ../branch
$ cd ../branch
$ echo 'branch content' >dir/file2
$ bzr add -q dir/file2
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Add dir/file2 in branch'
$ bzr merge ../trunk
2>-D dir/file
2>Conflict: can't delete dir because it is not empty. Not deleting.
2>Conflict because dir is not versioned, but has versioned children. Versioned directory.
2>2 conflicts encountered.
"""
def test_keep_them_all(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_adopt_child(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr mv -q dir/file2 file2
$ bzr rm -q dir --force
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_kill_them_all(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr rm -q dir --force
$ bzr resolve dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_resolve_taking_this(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve --take-this dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_resolve_taking_other(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve --take-other dir
2>deleted dir/file2
2>deleted dir
2>2 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
class TestResolveParentLoop(TestParametrizedResolveConflicts):
_conflict_type = conflicts.ParentLoop
_this_args = None
_other_args = None
# Each side dict additionally defines:
# - dir_id: the directory being moved
# - target_id: The target directory
# - xfail: whether the test is expected to fail if the action is
# involved as 'other'
scenarios = mirror_scenarios(
[
# Dirs moved into each other
(dict(_base_actions='create_dir1_dir2'),
('dir1_into_dir2',
dict(actions='move_dir1_into_dir2', check='dir1_moved',
dir_id='dir1-id', target_id='dir2-id', xfail=False)),
('dir2_into_dir1',
dict(actions='move_dir2_into_dir1', check='dir2_moved',
dir_id='dir2-id', target_id='dir1-id', xfail=False))),
# Subdirs moved into each other
(dict(_base_actions='create_dir1_4'),
('dir1_into_dir4',
dict(actions='move_dir1_into_dir4', check='dir1_2_moved',
dir_id='dir1-id', target_id='dir4-id', xfail=True)),
('dir3_into_dir2',
dict(actions='move_dir3_into_dir2', check='dir3_4_moved',
dir_id='dir3-id', target_id='dir2-id', xfail=True))),
])
def do_create_dir1_dir2(self):
return [('add', ('dir1', 'dir1-id', 'directory', '')),
('add', ('dir2', 'dir2-id', 'directory', '')),]
def do_move_dir1_into_dir2(self):
return [('rename', ('dir1', 'dir2/dir1'))]
def check_dir1_moved(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir1')
self.assertPathExists('branch/dir2/dir1')
def do_move_dir2_into_dir1(self):
return [('rename', ('dir2', 'dir1/dir2'))]
def check_dir2_moved(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir2')
self.assertPathExists('branch/dir1/dir2')
def do_create_dir1_4(self):
return [('add', ('dir1', 'dir1-id', 'directory', '')),
('add', ('dir1/dir2', 'dir2-id', 'directory', '')),
('add', ('dir3', 'dir3-id', 'directory', '')),
('add', ('dir3/dir4', 'dir4-id', 'directory', '')),]
def do_move_dir1_into_dir4(self):
return [('rename', ('dir1', 'dir3/dir4/dir1'))]
def check_dir1_2_moved(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir1')
self.assertPathExists('branch/dir3/dir4/dir1')
self.assertPathExists('branch/dir3/dir4/dir1/dir2')
def do_move_dir3_into_dir2(self):
return [('rename', ('dir3', 'dir1/dir2/dir3'))]
def check_dir3_4_moved(self):
self.assertPathDoesNotExist('branch/dir3')
self.assertPathExists('branch/dir1/dir2/dir3')
self.assertPathExists('branch/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4')
def _get_resolve_path_arg(self, wt, action):
# ParentLoop says: moving <conflict_path> into <path>. Cancelled move.
# But since <path> doesn't exist in the working tree, we need to use
# <conflict_path> instead, and that, in turn, is given by dir_id. Pfew.
return wt.id2path(self._other['dir_id'])
def assertParentLoop(self, wt, c):
self.assertEqual(self._other['dir_id'], c.file_id)
self.assertEqual(self._other['target_id'], c.conflict_file_id)
# The conflict paths are irrelevant (they are deterministic but not
# worth checking since they don't provide the needed information
# anyway)
if self._other['xfail']:
# It's a bit hackish to raise from here relying on being called for
# both tests but this avoid overriding test_resolve_taking_other
raise tests.KnownFailure(
"ParentLoop doesn't carry enough info to resolve --take-other")
_assert_conflict = assertParentLoop
class TestResolveNonDirectoryParent(TestResolveConflicts):
preamble = """
$ bzr init trunk
...
$ cd trunk
$ bzr mkdir foo
...
$ bzr commit -m 'Create trunk' -q
$ echo "Boing" >foo/bar
$ bzr add -q foo/bar
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Add foo/bar'
$ bzr branch -q . -r 1 ../branch
$ cd ../branch
$ rm -r foo
$ echo "Boo!" >foo
$ bzr commit -q -m 'foo is now a file'
$ bzr merge ../trunk
2>+N foo.new/bar
2>RK foo => foo.new/
# FIXME: The message is misleading, foo.new *is* a directory when the message
# is displayed -- vila 090916
2>Conflict: foo.new is not a directory, but has files in it. Created directory.
2>1 conflicts encountered.
"""
def test_take_this(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr rm -q foo.new --force
# FIXME: Isn't it weird that foo is now unkown even if foo.new has been put
# aside ? -- vila 090916
$ bzr add -q foo
$ bzr resolve foo.new
2>1 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_take_other(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr rm -q foo --force
$ bzr mv -q foo.new foo
$ bzr resolve foo
2>1 conflict(s) resolved, 0 remaining
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_resolve_taking_this(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve --take-this foo.new
2>...
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
def test_resolve_taking_other(self):
self.run_script("""
$ bzr resolve --take-other foo.new
2>...
$ bzr commit -q --strict -m 'No more conflicts nor unknown files'
""")
class TestMalformedTransform(script.TestCaseWithTransportAndScript):
def test_bug_430129(self):
# This is nearly like TestResolveNonDirectoryParent but with branch and
# trunk switched. As such it should certainly produce the same
# conflict.
self.run_script("""
$ bzr init trunk
...
$ cd trunk
$ bzr mkdir foo
...
$ bzr commit -m 'Create trunk' -q
$ rm -r foo
$ echo "Boo!" >foo
$ bzr commit -m 'foo is now a file' -q
$ bzr branch -q . -r 1 ../branch -q
$ cd ../branch
$ echo "Boing" >foo/bar
$ bzr add -q foo/bar -q
$ bzr commit -m 'Add foo/bar' -q
$ bzr merge ../trunk
2>bzr: ERROR: Tree transform is malformed [('unversioned executability', 'new-1')]
""")
class TestResolveActionOption(tests.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
super(TestResolveActionOption, self).setUp()
self.options = [conflicts.ResolveActionOption()]
self.parser = option.get_optparser(dict((o.name, o)
for o in self.options))
def parse(self, args):
return self.parser.parse_args(args)
def test_unknown_action(self):
self.assertRaises(errors.BadOptionValue,
self.parse, ['--action', 'take-me-to-the-moon'])
def test_done(self):
opts, args = self.parse(['--action', 'done'])
self.assertEqual({'action':'done'}, opts)
def test_take_this(self):
opts, args = self.parse(['--action', 'take-this'])
self.assertEqual({'action': 'take_this'}, opts)
opts, args = self.parse(['--take-this'])
self.assertEqual({'action': 'take_this'}, opts)
def test_take_other(self):
opts, args = self.parse(['--action', 'take-other'])
self.assertEqual({'action': 'take_other'}, opts)
opts, args = self.parse(['--take-other'])
self.assertEqual({'action': 'take_other'}, opts)
|