~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev

« back to all changes in this revision

Viewing changes to bzrlib/tests/test_lockable_files.py

  • Committer: Martin Pool
  • Date: 2005-07-28 11:56:24 UTC
  • Revision ID: mbp@sourcefrog.net-20050728115624-93c11c2b1e399023
- note changes to command line parsing

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context:
1
 
# Copyright (C) 2005-2010 Canonical Ltd
2
 
#
3
 
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4
 
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5
 
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
6
 
# (at your option) any later version.
7
 
#
8
 
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9
 
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10
 
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
11
 
# GNU General Public License for more details.
12
 
#
13
 
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14
 
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
15
 
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
16
 
 
17
 
from StringIO import StringIO
18
 
 
19
 
import bzrlib
20
 
from bzrlib import (
21
 
    errors,
22
 
    lockdir,
23
 
    osutils,
24
 
    transport,
25
 
    )
26
 
from bzrlib.errors import BzrBadParameterNotString, NoSuchFile, ReadOnlyError
27
 
from bzrlib.lockable_files import LockableFiles, TransportLock
28
 
from bzrlib.symbol_versioning import (
29
 
    deprecated_in,
30
 
    )
31
 
from bzrlib.tests import (
32
 
    TestCaseInTempDir,
33
 
    TestNotApplicable,
34
 
    )
35
 
from bzrlib.tests.test_smart import TestCaseWithSmartMedium
36
 
from bzrlib.tests.test_transactions import DummyWeave
37
 
from bzrlib.transactions import (PassThroughTransaction,
38
 
                                 ReadOnlyTransaction,
39
 
                                 WriteTransaction,
40
 
                                 )
41
 
 
42
 
 
43
 
# these tests are applied in each parameterized suite for LockableFiles
44
 
#
45
 
# they use an old style of parameterization, but we want to remove this class
46
 
# so won't modernize them now. - mbp 20080430
47
 
class _TestLockableFiles_mixin(object):
48
 
 
49
 
    def test_transactions(self):
50
 
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
51
 
                      PassThroughTransaction)
52
 
        self.lockable.lock_read()
53
 
        try:
54
 
            self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
55
 
                          ReadOnlyTransaction)
56
 
        finally:
57
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
58
 
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
59
 
                      PassThroughTransaction)
60
 
        self.lockable.lock_write()
61
 
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
62
 
                      WriteTransaction)
63
 
        # check that finish is called:
64
 
        vf = DummyWeave('a')
65
 
        self.lockable.get_transaction().register_dirty(vf)
66
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
67
 
        self.assertTrue(vf.finished)
68
 
 
69
 
    def test__escape(self):
70
 
        self.assertEqual('%25', self.lockable._escape('%'))
71
 
 
72
 
    def test__escape_empty(self):
73
 
        self.assertEqual('', self.lockable._escape(''))
74
 
 
75
 
    def test_break_lock(self):
76
 
        # some locks are not breakable
77
 
        self.lockable.lock_write()
78
 
        try:
79
 
            self.assertRaises(AssertionError, self.lockable.break_lock)
80
 
        except NotImplementedError:
81
 
            # this lock cannot be broken
82
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
83
 
            raise TestNotApplicable("%r is not breakable" % (self.lockable,))
84
 
        l2 = self.get_lockable()
85
 
        orig_factory = bzrlib.ui.ui_factory
86
 
        # silent ui - no need for stdout
87
 
        bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = bzrlib.ui.CannedInputUIFactory([True])
88
 
        try:
89
 
            l2.break_lock()
90
 
        finally:
91
 
            bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = orig_factory
92
 
        try:
93
 
            l2.lock_write()
94
 
            l2.unlock()
95
 
        finally:
96
 
            self.assertRaises(errors.LockBroken, self.lockable.unlock)
97
 
            self.assertFalse(self.lockable.is_locked())
98
 
 
99
 
    def test_lock_write_returns_None_refuses_token(self):
100
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
101
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
102
 
        if token is not None:
103
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable supports
104
 
            # tokens.
105
 
            raise TestNotApplicable("%r uses tokens" % (self.lockable,))
106
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenLockingNotSupported,
107
 
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token='token')
108
 
 
109
 
    def test_lock_write_returns_token_when_given_token(self):
110
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
111
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
112
 
        if token is None:
113
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
114
 
            # tokens.
115
 
            return
116
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
117
 
        token_from_new_lockable = new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
118
 
        self.addCleanup(new_lockable.unlock)
119
 
        self.assertEqual(token, token_from_new_lockable)
120
 
 
121
 
    def test_lock_write_raises_on_token_mismatch(self):
122
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
123
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
124
 
        if token is None:
125
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
126
 
            # tokens.
127
 
            return
128
 
        different_token = token + 'xxx'
129
 
        # Re-using the same lockable instance with a different token will
130
 
        # raise TokenMismatch.
131
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
132
 
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
133
 
        # A separate instance for the same lockable will also raise
134
 
        # TokenMismatch.
135
 
        # This detects the case where a caller claims to have a lock (via
136
 
        # the token) for an external resource, but doesn't (the token is
137
 
        # different).  Clients need a separate lock object to make sure the
138
 
        # external resource is probed, whereas the existing lock object
139
 
        # might cache.
140
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
141
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
142
 
                          new_lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
143
 
 
144
 
    def test_lock_write_with_matching_token(self):
145
 
        # If the token matches, so no exception is raised by lock_write.
146
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
147
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
148
 
        if token is None:
149
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
150
 
            # tokens.
151
 
            return
152
 
        # The same instance will accept a second lock_write if the specified
153
 
        # token matches.
154
 
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
155
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
156
 
        # Calling lock_write on a new instance for the same lockable will
157
 
        # also succeed.
158
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
159
 
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
160
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
161
 
 
162
 
    def test_unlock_after_lock_write_with_token(self):
163
 
        # If lock_write did not physically acquire the lock (because it was
164
 
        # passed a token), then unlock should not physically release it.
165
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
166
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
167
 
        if token is None:
168
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
169
 
            # tokens.
170
 
            return
171
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
172
 
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
173
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
174
 
        self.assertTrue(self.lockable.get_physical_lock_status())
175
 
 
176
 
    def test_lock_write_with_token_fails_when_unlocked(self):
177
 
        # Lock and unlock to get a superficially valid token.  This mimics a
178
 
        # likely programming error, where a caller accidentally tries to lock
179
 
        # with a token that is no longer valid (because the original lock was
180
 
        # released).
181
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
182
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
183
 
        if token is None:
184
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
185
 
            # tokens.
186
 
            return
187
 
 
188
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
189
 
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token=token)
190
 
 
191
 
    def test_lock_write_reenter_with_token(self):
192
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
193
 
        try:
194
 
            if token is None:
195
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
196
 
                # tokens.
197
 
                return
198
 
            # Relock with a token.
199
 
            token_from_reentry = self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
200
 
            try:
201
 
                self.assertEqual(token, token_from_reentry)
202
 
            finally:
203
 
                self.lockable.unlock()
204
 
        finally:
205
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
206
 
        # The lock should be unlocked on disk.  Verify that with a new lock
207
 
        # instance.
208
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
209
 
        # Calling lock_write now should work, rather than raise LockContention.
210
 
        new_lockable.lock_write()
211
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
212
 
 
213
 
    def test_second_lock_write_returns_same_token(self):
214
 
        first_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
215
 
        try:
216
 
            if first_token is None:
217
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
218
 
                # tokens.
219
 
                return
220
 
            # Relock the already locked lockable.  It should return the same
221
 
            # token.
222
 
            second_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
223
 
            try:
224
 
                self.assertEqual(first_token, second_token)
225
 
            finally:
226
 
                self.lockable.unlock()
227
 
        finally:
228
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
229
 
 
230
 
    def test_leave_in_place(self):
231
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
232
 
        try:
233
 
            if token is None:
234
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
235
 
                # tokens.
236
 
                return
237
 
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
238
 
        finally:
239
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
240
 
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk
241
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, self.lockable.lock_write)
242
 
        # But should be relockable with a token.
243
 
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
244
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
245
 
        # Cleanup: we should still be able to get the lock, but we restore the
246
 
        # behavior to clearing the lock when unlocking.
247
 
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
248
 
        self.lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
249
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
250
 
 
251
 
    def test_dont_leave_in_place(self):
252
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
253
 
        try:
254
 
            if token is None:
255
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
256
 
                # tokens.
257
 
                return
258
 
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
259
 
        finally:
260
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
261
 
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk.
262
 
        # Acquire the existing lock with the token, and ask that it is removed
263
 
        # when this object unlocks, and unlock to trigger that removal.
264
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
265
 
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
266
 
        new_lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
267
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
268
 
        # At this point, the lock is no longer on disk, so we can lock it.
269
 
        third_lockable = self.get_lockable()
270
 
        third_lockable.lock_write()
271
 
        third_lockable.unlock()
272
 
 
273
 
 
274
 
# This method of adapting tests to parameters is different to
275
 
# the TestProviderAdapters used elsewhere, but seems simpler for this
276
 
# case.
277
 
class TestLockableFiles_TransportLock(TestCaseInTempDir,
278
 
                                      _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
279
 
 
280
 
    def setUp(self):
281
 
        TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
282
 
        t = transport.get_transport('.')
283
 
        t.mkdir('.bzr')
284
 
        self.sub_transport = t.clone('.bzr')
285
 
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
286
 
        self.lockable.create_lock()
287
 
 
288
 
    def stop_server(self):
289
 
        super(TestLockableFiles_TransportLock, self).stop_server()
290
 
        # free the subtransport so that we do not get a 5 second
291
 
        # timeout due to the SFTP connection cache.
292
 
        try:
293
 
            del self.sub_transport
294
 
        except AttributeError:
295
 
            pass
296
 
 
297
 
    def get_lockable(self):
298
 
        return LockableFiles(self.sub_transport, 'my-lock', TransportLock)
299
 
 
300
 
 
301
 
class TestLockableFiles_LockDir(TestCaseInTempDir,
302
 
                              _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
303
 
    """LockableFile tests run with LockDir underneath"""
304
 
 
305
 
    def setUp(self):
306
 
        TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
307
 
        self.transport = transport.get_transport('.')
308
 
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
309
 
        # the lock creation here sets mode - test_permissions on branch
310
 
        # tests that implicitly, but it might be a good idea to factor
311
 
        # out the mode checking logic and have it applied to loackable files
312
 
        # directly. RBC 20060418
313
 
        self.lockable.create_lock()
314
 
 
315
 
    def get_lockable(self):
316
 
        return LockableFiles(self.transport, 'my-lock', lockdir.LockDir)
317
 
 
318
 
    def test_lock_created(self):
319
 
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
320
 
        self.lockable.lock_write()
321
 
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
322
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
323
 
        self.assertFalse(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
324
 
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
325
 
 
326
 
    def test__file_modes(self):
327
 
        self.transport.mkdir('readonly')
328
 
        osutils.make_readonly('readonly')
329
 
        lockable = LockableFiles(self.transport.clone('readonly'), 'test-lock',
330
 
                                 lockdir.LockDir)
331
 
        # The directory mode should be read-write-execute for the current user
332
 
        self.assertEqual(00700, lockable._dir_mode & 00700)
333
 
        # Files should be read-write for the current user
334
 
        self.assertEqual(00600, lockable._file_mode & 00700)
335
 
 
336
 
 
337
 
class TestLockableFiles_RemoteLockDir(TestCaseWithSmartMedium,
338
 
                              _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
339
 
    """LockableFile tests run with RemoteLockDir on a branch."""
340
 
 
341
 
    def setUp(self):
342
 
        TestCaseWithSmartMedium.setUp(self)
343
 
        # can only get a RemoteLockDir with some RemoteObject...
344
 
        # use a branch as thats what we want. These mixin tests test the end
345
 
        # to end behaviour, so stubbing out the backend and simulating would
346
 
        # defeat the purpose. We test the protocol implementation separately
347
 
        # in test_remote and test_smart as usual.
348
 
        b = self.make_branch('foo')
349
 
        self.addCleanup(b.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
350
 
        self.transport = transport.get_transport('.')
351
 
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
352
 
 
353
 
    def get_lockable(self):
354
 
        # getting a new lockable involves opening a new instance of the branch
355
 
        branch = bzrlib.branch.Branch.open(self.get_url('foo'))
356
 
        self.addCleanup(branch.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
357
 
        return branch.control_files