~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev

« back to all changes in this revision

Viewing changes to bzrlib/tests/test_lockdir.py

  • Committer: Patch Queue Manager
  • Date: 2016-04-21 05:06:57 UTC
  • mfrom: (6603.4.1 bzr)
  • Revision ID: pqm@pqm.ubuntu.com-20160421050657-ygnzfybewvudf1j9
(richard-wilbur) Use initial_comment as commit_message for lp_propose.(Shawn
 Wang) (Shawn Wang)

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context:
1
 
# Copyright (C) 2006-2010 Canonical Ltd
 
1
# Copyright (C) 2006-2012, 2016 Canonical Ltd
2
2
#
3
3
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4
4
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
16
16
 
17
17
"""Tests for LockDir"""
18
18
 
19
 
from cStringIO import StringIO
20
19
import os
21
 
from threading import Thread, Lock
22
20
import time
23
21
 
24
22
import bzrlib
26
24
    config,
27
25
    errors,
28
26
    lock,
 
27
    lockdir,
29
28
    osutils,
30
29
    tests,
31
30
    transport,
34
33
    LockBreakMismatch,
35
34
    LockBroken,
36
35
    LockContention,
37
 
    LockError,
38
36
    LockFailed,
39
37
    LockNotHeld,
40
38
    )
41
 
from bzrlib.lockdir import LockDir
42
 
from bzrlib.tests import TestCaseWithTransport
43
 
from bzrlib.trace import note
44
 
 
45
 
# These tests sometimes use threads to test the behaviour of lock files with
46
 
# concurrent actors.  This is not a typical (or necessarily supported) use;
47
 
# they're really meant for guarding between processes.
 
39
from bzrlib.lockdir import (
 
40
    LockDir,
 
41
    LockHeldInfo,
 
42
    )
 
43
from bzrlib.tests import (
 
44
    features,
 
45
    TestCase,
 
46
    TestCaseInTempDir,
 
47
    TestCaseWithTransport,
 
48
    )
48
49
 
49
50
# These tests are run on the default transport provided by the test framework
50
51
# (typically a local disk transport).  That can be changed by the --transport
52
53
# implementation are tested separately.  (The main requirement is just that
53
54
# they don't allow overwriting nonempty directories.)
54
55
 
 
56
 
55
57
class TestLockDir(TestCaseWithTransport):
56
58
    """Test LockDir operations"""
57
59
 
145
147
        self.addCleanup(lf1.unlock)
146
148
        # lock is held, should get some info on it
147
149
        info1 = lf1.peek()
148
 
        self.assertEqual(set(info1.keys()),
149
 
                         set(['user', 'nonce', 'hostname', 'pid', 'start_time']))
 
150
        self.assertEqual(set(info1.info_dict.keys()),
 
151
            set(['user', 'nonce', 'hostname', 'pid', 'start_time']))
150
152
        # should get the same info if we look at it through a different
151
153
        # instance
152
154
        info2 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock').peek()
165
167
        self.addCleanup(lf1.unlock)
166
168
        info2 = lf2.peek()
167
169
        self.assertTrue(info2)
168
 
        self.assertEqual(info2['nonce'], lf1.nonce)
 
170
        self.assertEqual(info2.get('nonce'), lf1.nonce)
169
171
 
170
172
    def test_30_lock_wait_fail(self):
171
173
        """Wait on a lock, then fail
188
190
            # it should only take about 0.4 seconds, but we allow more time in
189
191
            # case the machine is heavily loaded
190
192
            self.assertTrue(after - before <= 8.0,
191
 
                    "took %f seconds to detect lock contention" % (after - before))
 
193
                "took %f seconds to detect lock contention" % (after - before))
192
194
        finally:
193
195
            lf1.unlock()
194
 
        lock_base = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
195
196
        self.assertEqual(1, len(self._logged_reports))
196
 
        lock_url = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
197
 
        self.assertEqual('%s %s\n'
198
 
                         '%s\n%s\n'
199
 
                         'Will continue to try until %s, unless '
200
 
                         'you press Ctrl-C.\n'
201
 
                         'See "bzr help break-lock" for more.',
202
 
                         self._logged_reports[0][0])
203
 
        args = self._logged_reports[0][1]
204
 
        self.assertEqual('Unable to obtain', args[0])
205
 
        self.assertEqual('lock %s' % (lock_base,), args[1])
206
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[2], 'held by ')
207
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[3], 'locked ')
208
 
        self.assertEndsWith(args[3], ' ago')
209
 
        self.assertContainsRe(args[4], r'\d\d:\d\d:\d\d')
 
197
        self.assertContainsRe(self._logged_reports[0][0],
 
198
            r'Unable to obtain lock .* held by jrandom@example\.com on .*'
 
199
            r' \(process #\d+\), acquired .* ago\.\n'
 
200
            r'Will continue to try until \d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}, unless '
 
201
            r'you press Ctrl-C.\n'
 
202
            r'See "bzr help break-lock" for more.')
210
203
 
211
204
    def test_31_lock_wait_easy(self):
212
205
        """Succeed when waiting on a lock with no contention.
224
217
            lf1.unlock()
225
218
        self.assertEqual([], self._logged_reports)
226
219
 
227
 
    def test_32_lock_wait_succeed(self):
228
 
        """Succeed when trying to acquire a lock that gets released
229
 
 
230
 
        One thread holds on a lock and then releases it; another
231
 
        tries to lock it.
232
 
        """
233
 
        # This test sometimes fails like this:
234
 
        # Traceback (most recent call last):
235
 
 
236
 
        #   File "/home/pqm/bzr-pqm-workdir/home/+trunk/bzrlib/tests/
237
 
        # test_lockdir.py", line 247, in test_32_lock_wait_succeed
238
 
        #     self.assertEqual(1, len(self._logged_reports))
239
 
        # AssertionError: not equal:
240
 
        # a = 1
241
 
        # b = 0
242
 
        raise tests.TestSkipped("Test fails intermittently")
243
 
        t = self.get_transport()
244
 
        lf1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
245
 
        lf1.create()
246
 
        lf1.attempt_lock()
247
 
 
248
 
        def wait_and_unlock():
249
 
            time.sleep(0.1)
250
 
            lf1.unlock()
251
 
        unlocker = Thread(target=wait_and_unlock)
252
 
        unlocker.start()
253
 
        try:
254
 
            lf2 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
255
 
            self.setup_log_reporter(lf2)
256
 
            before = time.time()
257
 
            # wait and then lock
258
 
            lf2.wait_lock(timeout=0.4, poll=0.1)
259
 
            after = time.time()
260
 
            self.assertTrue(after - before <= 1.0)
261
 
        finally:
262
 
            unlocker.join()
263
 
 
264
 
        # There should be only 1 report, even though it should have to
265
 
        # wait for a while
266
 
        lock_base = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
267
 
        self.assertEqual(1, len(self._logged_reports))
268
 
        self.assertEqual('%s %s\n'
269
 
                         '%s\n%s\n'
270
 
                         'Will continue to try until %s\n',
271
 
                         self._logged_reports[0][0])
272
 
        args = self._logged_reports[0][1]
273
 
        self.assertEqual('Unable to obtain', args[0])
274
 
        self.assertEqual('lock %s' % (lock_base,), args[1])
275
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[2], 'held by ')
276
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[3], 'locked ')
277
 
        self.assertEndsWith(args[3], ' ago')
278
 
        self.assertContainsRe(args[4], r'\d\d:\d\d:\d\d')
279
 
 
280
 
    def test_34_lock_write_waits(self):
281
 
        """LockDir.lock_write() will wait for the lock."""
282
 
        # the test suite sets the default to 0 to make deadlocks fail fast.
283
 
        # change it for this test, as we want to try a manual deadlock.
284
 
        raise tests.TestSkipped('Timing-sensitive test')
285
 
        bzrlib.lockdir._DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 300
286
 
        t = self.get_transport()
287
 
        lf1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
288
 
        lf1.create()
289
 
        lf1.attempt_lock()
290
 
 
291
 
        def wait_and_unlock():
292
 
            time.sleep(0.1)
293
 
            lf1.unlock()
294
 
        unlocker = Thread(target=wait_and_unlock)
295
 
        unlocker.start()
296
 
        try:
297
 
            lf2 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
298
 
            self.setup_log_reporter(lf2)
299
 
            before = time.time()
300
 
            # wait and then lock
301
 
            lf2.lock_write()
302
 
            after = time.time()
303
 
        finally:
304
 
            unlocker.join()
305
 
 
306
 
        # There should be only 1 report, even though it should have to
307
 
        # wait for a while
308
 
        lock_base = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
309
 
        self.assertEqual(1, len(self._logged_reports))
310
 
        self.assertEqual('%s %s\n'
311
 
                         '%s\n%s\n'
312
 
                         'Will continue to try until %s\n',
313
 
                         self._logged_reports[0][0])
314
 
        args = self._logged_reports[0][1]
315
 
        self.assertEqual('Unable to obtain', args[0])
316
 
        self.assertEqual('lock %s' % (lock_base,), args[1])
317
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[2], 'held by ')
318
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[3], 'locked ')
319
 
        self.assertEndsWith(args[3], ' ago')
320
 
        self.assertContainsRe(args[4], r'\d\d:\d\d:\d\d')
321
 
 
322
 
    def test_35_wait_lock_changing(self):
323
 
        """LockDir.wait_lock() will report if the lock changes underneath.
324
 
 
325
 
        This is the stages we want to happen:
326
 
 
327
 
        0) Synchronization locks are created and locked.
328
 
        1) Lock1 obtains the lockdir, and releases the 'check' lock.
329
 
        2) Lock2 grabs the 'check' lock, and checks the lockdir.
330
 
           It sees the lockdir is already acquired, reports the fact,
331
 
           and unsets the 'checked' lock.
332
 
        3) Thread1 blocks on acquiring the 'checked' lock, and then tells
333
 
           Lock1 to release and acquire the lockdir. This resets the 'check'
334
 
           lock.
335
 
        4) Lock2 acquires the 'check' lock, and checks again. It notices
336
 
           that the holder of the lock has changed, and so reports a new
337
 
           lock holder.
338
 
        5) Thread1 blocks on the 'checked' lock, this time, it completely
339
 
           unlocks the lockdir, allowing Lock2 to acquire the lock.
340
 
        """
341
 
 
342
 
        raise tests.KnownFailure(
343
 
            "timing dependency in lock tests (#213182)")
344
 
 
345
 
        wait_to_check_lock = Lock()
346
 
        wait_until_checked_lock = Lock()
347
 
 
348
 
        wait_to_check_lock.acquire()
349
 
        wait_until_checked_lock.acquire()
350
 
        note('locked check and checked locks')
351
 
 
352
 
        class LockDir1(LockDir):
353
 
            """Use the synchronization points for the first lock."""
354
 
 
355
 
            def attempt_lock(self):
356
 
                # Once we have acquired the lock, it is okay for
357
 
                # the other lock to check it
358
 
                try:
359
 
                    return super(LockDir1, self).attempt_lock()
360
 
                finally:
361
 
                    note('lock1: releasing check lock')
362
 
                    wait_to_check_lock.release()
363
 
 
364
 
        class LockDir2(LockDir):
365
 
            """Use the synchronization points for the second lock."""
366
 
 
367
 
            def attempt_lock(self):
368
 
                note('lock2: waiting for check lock')
369
 
                wait_to_check_lock.acquire()
370
 
                note('lock2: acquired check lock')
371
 
                try:
372
 
                    return super(LockDir2, self).attempt_lock()
373
 
                finally:
374
 
                    note('lock2: releasing checked lock')
375
 
                    wait_until_checked_lock.release()
376
 
 
377
 
        t = self.get_transport()
378
 
        lf1 = LockDir1(t, 'test_lock')
379
 
        lf1.create()
380
 
 
381
 
        lf2 = LockDir2(t, 'test_lock')
382
 
        self.setup_log_reporter(lf2)
383
 
 
384
 
        def wait_and_switch():
385
 
            lf1.attempt_lock()
386
 
            # Block until lock2 has had a chance to check
387
 
            note('lock1: waiting 1 for checked lock')
388
 
            wait_until_checked_lock.acquire()
389
 
            note('lock1: acquired for checked lock')
390
 
            note('lock1: released lockdir')
391
 
            lf1.unlock()
392
 
            note('lock1: acquiring lockdir')
393
 
            # Create a new nonce, so the lock looks different.
394
 
            lf1.nonce = osutils.rand_chars(20)
395
 
            lf1.lock_write()
396
 
            note('lock1: acquired lockdir')
397
 
 
398
 
            # Block until lock2 has peeked again
399
 
            note('lock1: waiting 2 for checked lock')
400
 
            wait_until_checked_lock.acquire()
401
 
            note('lock1: acquired for checked lock')
402
 
            # Now unlock, and let lock 2 grab the lock
403
 
            lf1.unlock()
404
 
            wait_to_check_lock.release()
405
 
 
406
 
        unlocker = Thread(target=wait_and_switch)
407
 
        unlocker.start()
408
 
        try:
409
 
            # Wait and play against the other thread
410
 
            lf2.wait_lock(timeout=20.0, poll=0.01)
411
 
        finally:
412
 
            unlocker.join()
413
 
        lf2.unlock()
414
 
 
415
 
        # There should be 2 reports, because the lock changed
416
 
        lock_base = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
417
 
        self.assertEqual(2, len(self._logged_reports))
418
 
        lock_url = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
419
 
        self.assertEqual('%s %s\n'
420
 
                         '%s\n%s\n'
421
 
                         'Will continue to try until %s, unless '
422
 
                         'you press Ctrl-C.\n'
423
 
                         'See "bzr help break-lock" for more.',
424
 
                         self._logged_reports[0][0])
425
 
        args = self._logged_reports[0][1]
426
 
        self.assertEqual('Unable to obtain', args[0])
427
 
        self.assertEqual('lock %s' % (lock_base,), args[1])
428
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[2], 'held by ')
429
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[3], 'locked ')
430
 
        self.assertEndsWith(args[3], ' ago')
431
 
        self.assertContainsRe(args[4], r'\d\d:\d\d:\d\d')
432
 
 
433
 
        self.assertEqual('%s %s\n'
434
 
                         '%s\n%s\n'
435
 
                         'Will continue to try until %s, unless '
436
 
                         'you press Ctrl-C.\n'
437
 
                         'See "bzr help break-lock" for more.',
438
 
                         self._logged_reports[1][0])
439
 
        args = self._logged_reports[1][1]
440
 
        self.assertEqual('Lock owner changed for', args[0])
441
 
        self.assertEqual('lock %s' % (lock_base,), args[1])
442
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[2], 'held by ')
443
 
        self.assertStartsWith(args[3], 'locked ')
444
 
        self.assertEndsWith(args[3], ' ago')
445
 
        self.assertContainsRe(args[4], r'\d\d:\d\d:\d\d')
446
 
 
447
220
    def test_40_confirm_easy(self):
448
221
        """Confirm a lock that's already held"""
449
222
        t = self.get_transport()
565
338
        finally:
566
339
            bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = orig_factory
567
340
 
 
341
    def test_break_lock_corrupt_info(self):
 
342
        """break_lock works even if the info file is corrupt (and tells the UI
 
343
        that it is corrupt).
 
344
        """
 
345
        ld = self.get_lock()
 
346
        ld2 = self.get_lock()
 
347
        ld.create()
 
348
        ld.lock_write()
 
349
        ld.transport.put_bytes_non_atomic('test_lock/held/info', '\0')
 
350
 
 
351
        class LoggingUIFactory(bzrlib.ui.SilentUIFactory):
 
352
            def __init__(self):
 
353
                self.prompts = []
 
354
 
 
355
            def get_boolean(self, prompt):
 
356
                self.prompts.append(('boolean', prompt))
 
357
                return True
 
358
 
 
359
        ui = LoggingUIFactory()
 
360
        self.overrideAttr(bzrlib.ui, 'ui_factory', ui)
 
361
        ld2.break_lock()
 
362
        self.assertLength(1, ui.prompts)
 
363
        self.assertEqual('boolean', ui.prompts[0][0])
 
364
        self.assertStartsWith(ui.prompts[0][1], 'Break (corrupt LockDir')
 
365
        self.assertRaises(LockBroken, ld.unlock)
 
366
 
 
367
    def test_break_lock_missing_info(self):
 
368
        """break_lock works even if the info file is missing (and tells the UI
 
369
        that it is corrupt).
 
370
        """
 
371
        ld = self.get_lock()
 
372
        ld2 = self.get_lock()
 
373
        ld.create()
 
374
        ld.lock_write()
 
375
        ld.transport.delete('test_lock/held/info')
 
376
 
 
377
        class LoggingUIFactory(bzrlib.ui.SilentUIFactory):
 
378
            def __init__(self):
 
379
                self.prompts = []
 
380
 
 
381
            def get_boolean(self, prompt):
 
382
                self.prompts.append(('boolean', prompt))
 
383
                return True
 
384
 
 
385
        ui = LoggingUIFactory()
 
386
        orig_factory = bzrlib.ui.ui_factory
 
387
        bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = ui
 
388
        try:
 
389
            ld2.break_lock()
 
390
            self.assertRaises(LockBroken, ld.unlock)
 
391
            self.assertLength(0, ui.prompts)
 
392
        finally:
 
393
            bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = orig_factory
 
394
        # Suppress warnings due to ld not being unlocked
 
395
        # XXX: if lock_broken hook was invoked in this case, this hack would
 
396
        # not be necessary.  - Andrew Bennetts, 2010-09-06.
 
397
        del self._lock_actions[:]
 
398
 
568
399
    def test_create_missing_base_directory(self):
569
400
        """If LockDir.path doesn't exist, it can be created
570
401
 
576
407
        lf1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
577
408
 
578
409
        lf1.create()
579
 
        self.failUnless(t.has('test_lock'))
 
410
        self.assertTrue(t.has('test_lock'))
580
411
 
581
412
        t.rmdir('test_lock')
582
 
        self.failIf(t.has('test_lock'))
 
413
        self.assertFalse(t.has('test_lock'))
583
414
 
584
415
        # This will create 'test_lock' if it needs to
585
416
        lf1.lock_write()
586
 
        self.failUnless(t.has('test_lock'))
587
 
        self.failUnless(t.has('test_lock/held/info'))
 
417
        self.assertTrue(t.has('test_lock'))
 
418
        self.assertTrue(t.has('test_lock/held/info'))
588
419
 
589
420
        lf1.unlock()
590
 
        self.failIf(t.has('test_lock/held/info'))
 
421
        self.assertFalse(t.has('test_lock/held/info'))
591
422
 
592
 
    def test__format_lock_info(self):
 
423
    def test_display_form(self):
593
424
        ld1 = self.get_lock()
594
425
        ld1.create()
595
426
        ld1.lock_write()
596
427
        try:
597
 
            info_list = ld1._format_lock_info(ld1.peek())
 
428
            info_list = ld1.peek().to_readable_dict()
598
429
        finally:
599
430
            ld1.unlock()
600
 
        self.assertEqual('lock %s' % (ld1.transport.abspath(ld1.path),),
601
 
                         info_list[0])
602
 
        self.assertContainsRe(info_list[1],
603
 
                              r'^held by .* on host .* \[process #\d*\]$')
604
 
        self.assertContainsRe(info_list[2], r'locked \d+ seconds? ago$')
 
431
        self.assertEqual(info_list['user'], u'jrandom@example.com')
 
432
        self.assertContainsRe(info_list['pid'], '^\d+$')
 
433
        self.assertContainsRe(info_list['time_ago'], r'^\d+ seconds? ago$')
605
434
 
606
435
    def test_lock_without_email(self):
607
 
        global_config = config.GlobalConfig()
 
436
        global_config = config.GlobalStack()
608
437
        # Intentionally has no email address
609
 
        global_config.set_user_option('email', 'User Identity')
 
438
        global_config.set('email', 'User Identity')
610
439
        ld1 = self.get_lock()
611
440
        ld1.create()
612
441
        ld1.lock_write()
613
442
        ld1.unlock()
614
443
 
615
444
    def test_lock_permission(self):
 
445
        self.requireFeature(features.not_running_as_root)
616
446
        if not osutils.supports_posix_readonly():
617
447
            raise tests.TestSkipped('Cannot induce a permission failure')
618
448
        ld1 = self.get_lock()
634
464
    def test_lock_with_buggy_rename(self):
635
465
        # test that lock acquisition handles servers which pretend they
636
466
        # renamed correctly but that actually fail
637
 
        t = transport.get_transport('brokenrename+' + self.get_url())
 
467
        t = transport.get_transport_from_url(
 
468
            'brokenrename+' + self.get_url())
638
469
        ld1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
639
470
        ld1.create()
640
471
        ld1.attempt_lock()
644
475
        # now the original caller should succeed in unlocking
645
476
        ld1.unlock()
646
477
        # and there should be nothing left over
647
 
        self.assertEquals([], t.list_dir('test_lock'))
 
478
        self.assertEqual([], t.list_dir('test_lock'))
648
479
 
649
480
    def test_failed_lock_leaves_no_trash(self):
650
481
        # if we fail to acquire the lock, we don't leave pending directories
654
485
        # should be nothing before we start
655
486
        ld1.create()
656
487
        t = self.get_transport().clone('test_lock')
 
488
 
657
489
        def check_dir(a):
658
 
            self.assertEquals(a, t.list_dir('.'))
 
490
            self.assertEqual(a, t.list_dir('.'))
 
491
 
659
492
        check_dir([])
660
493
        # when held, that's all we see
661
494
        ld1.attempt_lock()
669
502
    def test_no_lockdir_info(self):
670
503
        """We can cope with empty info files."""
671
504
        # This seems like a fairly common failure case - see
672
 
        # <https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/185103> and all its dupes.
 
505
        # <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/185103> and all its dupes.
673
506
        # Processes are often interrupted after opening the file
674
507
        # before the actual contents are committed.
675
508
        t = self.get_transport()
678
511
        t.put_bytes('test_lock/held/info', '')
679
512
        lf = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
680
513
        info = lf.peek()
681
 
        formatted_info = lf._format_lock_info(info)
682
 
        self.assertEquals(
683
 
            ['lock %s' % t.abspath('test_lock'),
684
 
             'held by <unknown> on host <unknown> [process #<unknown>]',
685
 
             'locked (unknown)'],
 
514
        formatted_info = info.to_readable_dict()
 
515
        self.assertEqual(
 
516
            dict(user='<unknown>', hostname='<unknown>', pid='<unknown>',
 
517
                time_ago='(unknown)'),
686
518
            formatted_info)
687
519
 
 
520
    def test_corrupt_lockdir_info(self):
 
521
        """We can cope with corrupt (and thus unparseable) info files."""
 
522
        # This seems like a fairly common failure case too - see
 
523
        # <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/619872> for instance.
 
524
        # In particular some systems tend to fill recently created files with
 
525
        # nul bytes after recovering from a system crash.
 
526
        t = self.get_transport()
 
527
        t.mkdir('test_lock')
 
528
        t.mkdir('test_lock/held')
 
529
        t.put_bytes('test_lock/held/info', '\0')
 
530
        lf = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
 
531
        self.assertRaises(errors.LockCorrupt, lf.peek)
 
532
        # Currently attempt_lock gives LockContention, but LockCorrupt would be
 
533
        # a reasonable result too.
 
534
        self.assertRaises(
 
535
            (errors.LockCorrupt, errors.LockContention), lf.attempt_lock)
 
536
        self.assertRaises(errors.LockCorrupt, lf.validate_token, 'fake token')
 
537
 
 
538
    def test_missing_lockdir_info(self):
 
539
        """We can cope with absent info files."""
 
540
        t = self.get_transport()
 
541
        t.mkdir('test_lock')
 
542
        t.mkdir('test_lock/held')
 
543
        lf = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
 
544
        # In this case we expect the 'not held' result from peek, because peek
 
545
        # cannot be expected to notice that there is a 'held' directory with no
 
546
        # 'info' file.
 
547
        self.assertEqual(None, lf.peek())
 
548
        # And lock/unlock may work or give LockContention (but not any other
 
549
        # error).
 
550
        try:
 
551
            lf.attempt_lock()
 
552
        except LockContention:
 
553
            # LockContention is ok, and expected on Windows
 
554
            pass
 
555
        else:
 
556
            # no error is ok, and expected on POSIX (because POSIX allows
 
557
            # os.rename over an empty directory).
 
558
            lf.unlock()
 
559
        # Currently raises TokenMismatch, but LockCorrupt would be reasonable
 
560
        # too.
 
561
        self.assertRaises(
 
562
            (errors.TokenMismatch, errors.LockCorrupt),
 
563
            lf.validate_token, 'fake token')
 
564
 
688
565
 
689
566
class TestLockDirHooks(TestCaseWithTransport):
690
567
 
776
653
        ld2.force_break(holder_info)
777
654
        lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
778
655
        self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
 
656
 
 
657
 
 
658
class TestLockHeldInfo(TestCaseInTempDir):
 
659
    """Can get information about the lock holder, and detect whether they're
 
660
    still alive."""
 
661
 
 
662
    def test_repr(self):
 
663
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
664
        self.assertContainsRe(repr(info), r"LockHeldInfo\(.*\)")
 
665
 
 
666
    def test_unicode(self):
 
667
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
668
        self.assertContainsRe(unicode(info),
 
669
            r'held by .* on .* \(process #\d+\), acquired .* ago')
 
670
 
 
671
    def test_is_locked_by_this_process(self):
 
672
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
673
        self.assertTrue(info.is_locked_by_this_process())
 
674
 
 
675
    def test_is_not_locked_by_this_process(self):
 
676
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
677
        info.info_dict['pid'] = '123123123123123'
 
678
        self.assertFalse(info.is_locked_by_this_process())
 
679
 
 
680
    def test_lock_holder_live_process(self):
 
681
        """Detect that the holder (this process) is still running."""
 
682
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
683
        self.assertFalse(info.is_lock_holder_known_dead())
 
684
 
 
685
    def test_lock_holder_dead_process(self):
 
686
        """Detect that the holder (this process) is still running."""
 
687
        self.overrideAttr(lockdir, 'get_host_name',
 
688
            lambda: 'aproperhostname')
 
689
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
690
        info.info_dict['pid'] = '123123123'
 
691
        self.assertTrue(info.is_lock_holder_known_dead())
 
692
 
 
693
    def test_lock_holder_other_machine(self):
 
694
        """The lock holder isn't here so we don't know if they're alive."""
 
695
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
696
        info.info_dict['hostname'] = 'egg.example.com'
 
697
        info.info_dict['pid'] = '123123123'
 
698
        self.assertFalse(info.is_lock_holder_known_dead())
 
699
 
 
700
    def test_lock_holder_other_user(self):
 
701
        """Only auto-break locks held by this user."""
 
702
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
703
        info.info_dict['user'] = 'notme@example.com'
 
704
        info.info_dict['pid'] = '123123123'
 
705
        self.assertFalse(info.is_lock_holder_known_dead())
 
706
 
 
707
    def test_no_good_hostname(self):
 
708
        """Correctly handle ambiguous hostnames.
 
709
 
 
710
        If the lock's recorded with just 'localhost' we can't really trust
 
711
        it's the same 'localhost'.  (There are quite a few of them. :-)
 
712
        So even if the process is known not to be alive, we can't say that's
 
713
        known for sure.
 
714
        """
 
715
        self.overrideAttr(lockdir, 'get_host_name',
 
716
            lambda: 'localhost')
 
717
        info = LockHeldInfo.for_this_process(None)
 
718
        info.info_dict['pid'] = '123123123'
 
719
        self.assertFalse(info.is_lock_holder_known_dead())
 
720
 
 
721
 
 
722
class TestStaleLockDir(TestCaseWithTransport):
 
723
    """Can automatically break stale locks.
 
724
 
 
725
    :see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/220464
 
726
    """
 
727
 
 
728
    def test_auto_break_stale_lock(self):
 
729
        """Locks safely known to be stale are just cleaned up.
 
730
 
 
731
        This generates a warning but no other user interaction.
 
732
        """
 
733
        self.overrideAttr(lockdir, 'get_host_name',
 
734
            lambda: 'aproperhostname')
 
735
        # This is off by default at present; see the discussion in the bug.
 
736
        # If you change the default, don't forget to update the docs.
 
737
        config.GlobalStack().set('locks.steal_dead', True)
 
738
        # Create a lock pretending to come from a different nonexistent
 
739
        # process on the same machine.
 
740
        l1 = LockDir(self.get_transport(), 'a',
 
741
            extra_holder_info={'pid': '12312313'})
 
742
        token_1 = l1.attempt_lock()
 
743
        l2 = LockDir(self.get_transport(), 'a')
 
744
        token_2 = l2.attempt_lock()
 
745
        # l1 will notice its lock was stolen.
 
746
        self.assertRaises(errors.LockBroken,
 
747
            l1.unlock)
 
748
        l2.unlock()
 
749
 
 
750
    def test_auto_break_stale_lock_configured_off(self):
 
751
        """Automatic breaking can be turned off"""
 
752
        l1 = LockDir(self.get_transport(), 'a',
 
753
            extra_holder_info={'pid': '12312313'})
 
754
        token_1 = l1.attempt_lock()
 
755
        self.addCleanup(l1.unlock)
 
756
        l2 = LockDir(self.get_transport(), 'a')
 
757
        # This fails now, because dead lock breaking is off by default.
 
758
        self.assertRaises(LockContention,
 
759
            l2.attempt_lock)
 
760
        # and it's in fact not broken
 
761
        l1.confirm()