← Back to branch summary

~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev

« back to all changes in this revision

Viewing changes to bzrlib/tests/test_lockable_files.py

  • Committer: Jelmer Vernooij
  • Date: 2010-03-13 02:49:14 UTC
  • mto: This revision was merged to the branch mainline in revision 5089.
  • Revision ID: jelmer@samba.org-20100313024914-rpuoguinoxpxt05b
Allow merge directives to output multiple patch files. 

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context:
bzrlib/tests/test_lockable_files.py
 
1
# Copyright (C) 2005-2010 Canonical Ltd
 
2
#
 
3
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 
4
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 
5
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
 
6
# (at your option) any later version.
 
7
#
 
8
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 
9
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 
10
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 
11
# GNU General Public License for more details.
 
12
#
 
13
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 
14
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
 
15
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
 
16
 
 
17
from StringIO import StringIO
 
18
 
 
19
import bzrlib
 
20
from bzrlib import (
 
21
    errors,
 
22
    lockdir,
 
23
    osutils,
 
24
    )
 
25
from bzrlib.errors import BzrBadParameterNotString, NoSuchFile, ReadOnlyError
 
26
from bzrlib.lockable_files import LockableFiles, TransportLock
 
27
from bzrlib.symbol_versioning import (
 
28
    deprecated_in,
 
29
    )
 
30
from bzrlib.tests import (
 
31
    TestCaseInTempDir,
 
32
    TestNotApplicable,
 
33
    )
 
34
from bzrlib.tests.test_smart import TestCaseWithSmartMedium
 
35
from bzrlib.tests.test_transactions import DummyWeave
 
36
from bzrlib.transactions import (PassThroughTransaction,
 
37
                                 ReadOnlyTransaction,
 
38
                                 WriteTransaction,
 
39
                                 )
 
40
from bzrlib.transport import get_transport
 
41
 
 
42
 
 
43
# these tests are applied in each parameterized suite for LockableFiles
 
44
#
 
45
# they use an old style of parameterization, but we want to remove this class
 
46
# so won't modernize them now. - mbp 20080430
 
47
class _TestLockableFiles_mixin(object):
 
48
 
 
49
    def test_transactions(self):
 
50
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
51
                      PassThroughTransaction)
 
52
        self.lockable.lock_read()
 
53
        try:
 
54
            self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
55
                          ReadOnlyTransaction)
 
56
        finally:
 
57
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
58
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
59
                      PassThroughTransaction)
 
60
        self.lockable.lock_write()
 
61
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
62
                      WriteTransaction)
 
63
        # check that finish is called:
 
64
        vf = DummyWeave('a')
 
65
        self.lockable.get_transaction().register_dirty(vf)
 
66
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
67
        self.assertTrue(vf.finished)
 
68
 
 
69
    def test__escape(self):
 
70
        self.assertEqual('%25', self.lockable._escape('%'))
 
71
 
 
72
    def test__escape_empty(self):
 
73
        self.assertEqual('', self.lockable._escape(''))
 
74
 
 
75
    def test_break_lock(self):
 
76
        # some locks are not breakable
 
77
        self.lockable.lock_write()
 
78
        try:
 
79
            self.assertRaises(AssertionError, self.lockable.break_lock)
 
80
        except NotImplementedError:
 
81
            # this lock cannot be broken
 
82
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
83
            raise TestNotApplicable("%r is not breakable" % (self.lockable,))
 
84
        l2 = self.get_lockable()
 
85
        orig_factory = bzrlib.ui.ui_factory
 
86
        # silent ui - no need for stdout
 
87
        bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = bzrlib.ui.CannedInputUIFactory([True])
 
88
        try:
 
89
            l2.break_lock()
 
90
        finally:
 
91
            bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = orig_factory
 
92
        try:
 
93
            l2.lock_write()
 
94
            l2.unlock()
 
95
        finally:
 
96
            self.assertRaises(errors.LockBroken, self.lockable.unlock)
 
97
            self.assertFalse(self.lockable.is_locked())
 
98
 
 
99
    def test_lock_write_returns_None_refuses_token(self):
 
100
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
101
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
 
102
        if token is not None:
 
103
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable supports
 
104
            # tokens.
 
105
            raise TestNotApplicable("%r uses tokens" % (self.lockable,))
 
106
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenLockingNotSupported,
 
107
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token='token')
 
108
 
 
109
    def test_lock_write_returns_token_when_given_token(self):
 
110
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
111
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
 
112
        if token is None:
 
113
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
114
            # tokens.
 
115
            return
 
116
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
117
        token_from_new_lockable = new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
118
        self.addCleanup(new_lockable.unlock)
 
119
        self.assertEqual(token, token_from_new_lockable)
 
120
 
 
121
    def test_lock_write_raises_on_token_mismatch(self):
 
122
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
123
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
 
124
        if token is None:
 
125
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
126
            # tokens.
 
127
            return
 
128
        different_token = token + 'xxx'
 
129
        # Re-using the same lockable instance with a different token will
 
130
        # raise TokenMismatch.
 
131
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
 
132
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
 
133
        # A separate instance for the same lockable will also raise
 
134
        # TokenMismatch.
 
135
        # This detects the case where a caller claims to have a lock (via
 
136
        # the token) for an external resource, but doesn't (the token is
 
137
        # different).  Clients need a separate lock object to make sure the
 
138
        # external resource is probed, whereas the existing lock object
 
139
        # might cache.
 
140
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
141
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
 
142
                          new_lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
 
143
 
 
144
    def test_lock_write_with_matching_token(self):
 
145
        # If the token matches, so no exception is raised by lock_write.
 
146
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
147
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
 
148
        if token is None:
 
149
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
150
            # tokens.
 
151
            return
 
152
        # The same instance will accept a second lock_write if the specified
 
153
        # token matches.
 
154
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
155
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
156
        # Calling lock_write on a new instance for the same lockable will
 
157
        # also succeed.
 
158
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
159
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
160
        new_lockable.unlock()
 
161
 
 
162
    def test_unlock_after_lock_write_with_token(self):
 
163
        # If lock_write did not physically acquire the lock (because it was
 
164
        # passed a token), then unlock should not physically release it.
 
165
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
166
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
 
167
        if token is None:
 
168
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
169
            # tokens.
 
170
            return
 
171
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
172
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
173
        new_lockable.unlock()
 
174
        self.assertTrue(self.lockable.get_physical_lock_status())
 
175
 
 
176
    def test_lock_write_with_token_fails_when_unlocked(self):
 
177
        # Lock and unlock to get a superficially valid token.  This mimics a
 
178
        # likely programming error, where a caller accidentally tries to lock
 
179
        # with a token that is no longer valid (because the original lock was
 
180
        # released).
 
181
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
182
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
183
        if token is None:
 
184
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
185
            # tokens.
 
186
            return
 
187
 
 
188
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
 
189
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token=token)
 
190
 
 
191
    def test_lock_write_reenter_with_token(self):
 
192
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
193
        try:
 
194
            if token is None:
 
195
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
196
                # tokens.
 
197
                return
 
198
            # Relock with a token.
 
199
            token_from_reentry = self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
200
            try:
 
201
                self.assertEqual(token, token_from_reentry)
 
202
            finally:
 
203
                self.lockable.unlock()
 
204
        finally:
 
205
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
206
        # The lock should be unlocked on disk.  Verify that with a new lock
 
207
        # instance.
 
208
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
209
        # Calling lock_write now should work, rather than raise LockContention.
 
210
        new_lockable.lock_write()
 
211
        new_lockable.unlock()
 
212
 
 
213
    def test_second_lock_write_returns_same_token(self):
 
214
        first_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
215
        try:
 
216
            if first_token is None:
 
217
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
218
                # tokens.
 
219
                return
 
220
            # Relock the already locked lockable.  It should return the same
 
221
            # token.
 
222
            second_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
223
            try:
 
224
                self.assertEqual(first_token, second_token)
 
225
            finally:
 
226
                self.lockable.unlock()
 
227
        finally:
 
228
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
229
 
 
230
    def test_leave_in_place(self):
 
231
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
232
        try:
 
233
            if token is None:
 
234
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
235
                # tokens.
 
236
                return
 
237
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
 
238
        finally:
 
239
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
240
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk
 
241
        self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, self.lockable.lock_write)
 
242
        # But should be relockable with a token.
 
243
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
244
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
245
        # Cleanup: we should still be able to get the lock, but we restore the
 
246
        # behavior to clearing the lock when unlocking.
 
247
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
248
        self.lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
 
249
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
250
 
 
251
    def test_dont_leave_in_place(self):
 
252
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
253
        try:
 
254
            if token is None:
 
255
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
256
                # tokens.
 
257
                return
 
258
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
 
259
        finally:
 
260
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
261
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk.
 
262
        # Acquire the existing lock with the token, and ask that it is removed
 
263
        # when this object unlocks, and unlock to trigger that removal.
 
264
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
265
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
266
        new_lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
 
267
        new_lockable.unlock()
 
268
        # At this point, the lock is no longer on disk, so we can lock it.
 
269
        third_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
270
        third_lockable.lock_write()
 
271
        third_lockable.unlock()
 
272
 
 
273
 
 
274
# This method of adapting tests to parameters is different to
 
275
# the TestProviderAdapters used elsewhere, but seems simpler for this
 
276
# case.
 
277
class TestLockableFiles_TransportLock(TestCaseInTempDir,
 
278
                                      _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
 
279
 
 
280
    def setUp(self):
 
281
        TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
 
282
        transport = get_transport('.')
 
283
        transport.mkdir('.bzr')
 
284
        self.sub_transport = transport.clone('.bzr')
 
285
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
286
        self.lockable.create_lock()
 
287
 
 
288
    def stop_server(self):
 
289
        super(TestLockableFiles_TransportLock, self).stop_server()
 
290
        # free the subtransport so that we do not get a 5 second
 
291
        # timeout due to the SFTP connection cache.
 
292
        try:
 
293
            del self.sub_transport
 
294
        except AttributeError:
 
295
            pass
 
296
 
 
297
    def get_lockable(self):
 
298
        return LockableFiles(self.sub_transport, 'my-lock', TransportLock)
 
299
 
 
300
 
 
301
class TestLockableFiles_LockDir(TestCaseInTempDir,
 
302
                              _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
 
303
    """LockableFile tests run with LockDir underneath"""
 
304
 
 
305
    def setUp(self):
 
306
        TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
 
307
        self.transport = get_transport('.')
 
308
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
309
        # the lock creation here sets mode - test_permissions on branch
 
310
        # tests that implicitly, but it might be a good idea to factor
 
311
        # out the mode checking logic and have it applied to loackable files
 
312
        # directly. RBC 20060418
 
313
        self.lockable.create_lock()
 
314
 
 
315
    def get_lockable(self):
 
316
        return LockableFiles(self.transport, 'my-lock', lockdir.LockDir)
 
317
 
 
318
    def test_lock_created(self):
 
319
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
 
320
        self.lockable.lock_write()
 
321
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
 
322
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
323
        self.assertFalse(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
 
324
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
 
325
 
 
326
    def test__file_modes(self):
 
327
        self.transport.mkdir('readonly')
 
328
        osutils.make_readonly('readonly')
 
329
        lockable = LockableFiles(self.transport.clone('readonly'), 'test-lock',
 
330
                                 lockdir.LockDir)
 
331
        # The directory mode should be read-write-execute for the current user
 
332
        self.assertEqual(00700, lockable._dir_mode & 00700)
 
333
        # Files should be read-write for the current user
 
334
        self.assertEqual(00600, lockable._file_mode & 00700)
 
335
 
 
336
 
 
337
class TestLockableFiles_RemoteLockDir(TestCaseWithSmartMedium,
 
338
                              _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
 
339
    """LockableFile tests run with RemoteLockDir on a branch."""
 
340
 
 
341
    def setUp(self):
 
342
        TestCaseWithSmartMedium.setUp(self)
 
343
        # can only get a RemoteLockDir with some RemoteObject...
 
344
        # use a branch as thats what we want. These mixin tests test the end
 
345
        # to end behaviour, so stubbing out the backend and simulating would
 
346
        # defeat the purpose. We test the protocol implementation separately
 
347
        # in test_remote and test_smart as usual.
 
348
        b = self.make_branch('foo')
 
349
        self.addCleanup(b.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
 
350
        self.transport = get_transport('.')
 
351
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
352
 
 
353
    def get_lockable(self):
 
354
        # getting a new lockable involves opening a new instance of the branch
 
355
        branch = bzrlib.branch.Branch.open(self.get_url('foo'))
 
356
        self.addCleanup(branch.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
 
357
        return branch.control_files