180
187
after = time.time()
181
188
# it should only take about 0.4 seconds, but we allow more time in
182
189
# case the machine is heavily loaded
183
self.assertTrue(after - before <= 8.0,
190
self.assertTrue(after - before <= 8.0,
184
191
"took %f seconds to detect lock contention" % (after - before))
187
194
lock_base = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
188
195
self.assertEqual(1, len(self._logged_reports))
196
lock_url = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
189
197
self.assertEqual('%s %s\n'
191
'Will continue to try until %s\n',
199
'Will continue to try until %s, unless '
201
'If you\'re sure that it\'s not being '
202
'modified, use bzr break-lock %s',
192
203
self._logged_reports[0][0])
193
204
args = self._logged_reports[0][1]
194
205
self.assertEqual('Unable to obtain', args[0])
257
278
self.assertEndsWith(args[3], ' ago')
258
279
self.assertContainsRe(args[4], r'\d\d:\d\d:\d\d')
260
def test_33_wait(self):
261
"""Succeed when waiting on a lock that gets released
263
The difference from test_32_lock_wait_succeed is that the second
264
caller does not actually acquire the lock, but just waits for it
265
to be released. This is done over a readonly transport.
267
t = self.get_transport()
268
lf1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
272
def wait_and_unlock():
275
unlocker = Thread(target=wait_and_unlock)
278
lf2 = LockDir(self.get_readonly_transport(), 'test_lock')
280
# wait but don't lock
281
lf2.wait(timeout=0.4, poll=0.1)
283
self.assertTrue(after - before <= 1.0)
287
281
def test_34_lock_write_waits(self):
288
"""LockDir.lock_write() will wait for the lock."""
282
"""LockDir.lock_write() will wait for the lock."""
289
283
# the test suite sets the default to 0 to make deadlocks fail fast.
290
284
# change it for this test, as we want to try a manual deadlock.
285
raise tests.TestSkipped('Timing-sensitive test')
291
286
bzrlib.lockdir._DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 300
292
287
t = self.get_transport()
293
288
lf1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
328
323
def test_35_wait_lock_changing(self):
329
324
"""LockDir.wait_lock() will report if the lock changes underneath.
331
326
This is the stages we want to happen:
333
328
0) Synchronization locks are created and locked.
334
329
1) Lock1 obtains the lockdir, and releases the 'check' lock.
335
330
2) Lock2 grabs the 'check' lock, and checks the lockdir.
336
It sees the lockdir is already acquired, reports the fact,
331
It sees the lockdir is already acquired, reports the fact,
337
332
and unsets the 'checked' lock.
338
333
3) Thread1 blocks on acquiring the 'checked' lock, and then tells
339
334
Lock1 to release and acquire the lockdir. This resets the 'check'
341
336
4) Lock2 acquires the 'check' lock, and checks again. It notices
342
that the holder of the lock has changed, and so reports a new
337
that the holder of the lock has changed, and so reports a new
344
339
5) Thread1 blocks on the 'checked' lock, this time, it completely
345
340
unlocks the lockdir, allowing Lock2 to acquire the lock.
343
raise tests.KnownFailure(
344
"timing dependency in lock tests (#213182)")
348
346
wait_to_check_lock = Lock()
349
347
wait_until_checked_lock = Lock()
614
622
lock_path = ld1.transport.local_abspath('test_lock')
615
623
os.mkdir(lock_path)
616
624
osutils.make_readonly(lock_path)
617
self.assertRaises(errors.PermissionDenied, ld1.attempt_lock)
625
self.assertRaises(errors.LockFailed, ld1.attempt_lock)
627
def test_lock_by_token(self):
628
ld1 = self.get_lock()
629
token = ld1.lock_write()
630
self.addCleanup(ld1.unlock)
631
self.assertNotEqual(None, token)
632
ld2 = self.get_lock()
633
t2 = ld2.lock_write(token)
634
self.addCleanup(ld2.unlock)
635
self.assertEqual(token, t2)
637
def test_lock_with_buggy_rename(self):
638
# test that lock acquisition handles servers which pretend they
639
# renamed correctly but that actually fail
640
t = transport.get_transport('brokenrename+' + self.get_url())
641
ld1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
644
ld2 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
645
# we should fail to lock
646
e = self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, ld2.attempt_lock)
647
# now the original caller should succeed in unlocking
649
# and there should be nothing left over
650
self.assertEquals([], t.list_dir('test_lock'))
652
def test_failed_lock_leaves_no_trash(self):
653
# if we fail to acquire the lock, we don't leave pending directories
654
# behind -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/109169
655
ld1 = self.get_lock()
656
ld2 = self.get_lock()
657
# should be nothing before we start
659
t = self.get_transport().clone('test_lock')
661
self.assertEquals(a, t.list_dir('.'))
663
# when held, that's all we see
665
self.addCleanup(ld1.unlock)
667
# second guy should fail
668
self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, ld2.attempt_lock)
673
class TestLockDirHooks(TestCaseWithTransport):
676
super(TestLockDirHooks, self).setUp()
680
return LockDir(self.get_transport(), 'test_lock')
682
def record_hook(self, result):
683
self._calls.append(result)
685
def test_LockDir_acquired_success(self):
686
# the LockDir.lock_acquired hook fires when a lock is acquired.
687
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_acquired',
688
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
691
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
692
result = ld.attempt_lock()
693
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
694
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
696
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
698
def test_LockDir_acquired_fail(self):
699
# the LockDir.lock_acquired hook does not fire on failure.
702
ld2 = self.get_lock()
704
# install a lock hook now, when the disk lock is locked
705
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_acquired',
706
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
707
self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, ld.attempt_lock)
708
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
710
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
712
def test_LockDir_released_success(self):
713
# the LockDir.lock_released hook fires when a lock is acquired.
714
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_released',
715
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
718
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
719
result = ld.attempt_lock()
720
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
722
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
723
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
725
def test_LockDir_released_fail(self):
726
# the LockDir.lock_released hook does not fire on failure.
729
ld2 = self.get_lock()
731
ld2.force_break(ld2.peek())
732
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_released',
733
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
734
self.assertRaises(LockBroken, ld.unlock)
735
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
737
def test_LockDir_broken_success(self):
738
# the LockDir.lock_broken hook fires when a lock is broken.
741
ld2 = self.get_lock()
742
result = ld.attempt_lock()
743
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_broken',
744
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
745
ld2.force_break(ld2.peek())
746
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
747
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
749
def test_LockDir_broken_failure(self):
750
# the LockDir.lock_broken hook does not fires when a lock is already
754
ld2 = self.get_lock()
755
result = ld.attempt_lock()
756
holder_info = ld2.peek()
758
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_broken',
759
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
760
ld2.force_break(holder_info)
761
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
762
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)