-
Committer:
John Arbash Meinel
-
Date:
2009-10-20 22:13:23 UTC
-
mto:
This revision was merged to the branch mainline in
revision
4771.
-
Revision ID:
john@arbash-meinel.com-20091020221323-vvukgazqxkicb70n
A bit broken, but getting there.
Start being much stricter about requiring StaticTuples everywhere.
I may go back and loosen this restriction, but getting the code base
StaticTuple pure is probably a good idea. The main reason to be 'looser'
is so that things don't fail 'in the wild' just because someone
calls an api with a tuple rather than a StaticTuple.
However, I'd like the internals to be 'pure' if possible.
We'll see.