13
13
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14
14
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
15
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
15
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
17
17
from StringIO import StringIO
20
from bzrlib.branch import Branch
21
import bzrlib.errors as errors
22
25
from bzrlib.errors import BzrBadParameterNotString, NoSuchFile, ReadOnlyError
23
26
from bzrlib.lockable_files import LockableFiles, TransportLock
24
from bzrlib.lockdir import LockDir
25
from bzrlib.tests import TestCaseInTempDir
27
from bzrlib.symbol_versioning import (
30
from bzrlib.tests import (
34
from bzrlib.tests.test_smart import TestCaseWithSmartMedium
26
35
from bzrlib.tests.test_transactions import DummyWeave
27
36
from bzrlib.transactions import (PassThroughTransaction,
28
37
ReadOnlyTransaction,
34
43
# these tests are applied in each parameterized suite for LockableFiles
45
# they use an old style of parameterization, but we want to remove this class
46
# so won't modernize them now. - mbp 20080430
35
47
class _TestLockableFiles_mixin(object):
37
49
def test_read_write(self):
38
self.assertRaises(NoSuchFile, self.lockable.get, 'foo')
39
self.assertRaises(NoSuchFile, self.lockable.get_utf8, 'foo')
50
self.assertRaises(NoSuchFile,
52
deprecated_in((1, 5, 0)),
53
self.lockable.get, 'foo')
54
self.assertRaises(NoSuchFile,
56
deprecated_in((1, 5, 0)),
57
self.lockable.get_utf8, 'foo')
40
58
self.lockable.lock_write()
42
unicode_string = u'bar\u1234'
43
self.assertEqual(4, len(unicode_string))
44
byte_string = unicode_string.encode('utf-8')
45
self.assertEqual(6, len(byte_string))
46
self.assertRaises(UnicodeEncodeError, self.lockable.put, 'foo',
47
StringIO(unicode_string))
48
self.lockable.put('foo', StringIO(byte_string))
49
self.assertEqual(byte_string,
50
self.lockable.get('foo').read())
51
self.assertEqual(unicode_string,
52
self.lockable.get_utf8('foo').read())
53
self.assertRaises(BzrBadParameterNotString,
54
self.lockable.put_utf8,
56
StringIO(unicode_string)
58
self.lockable.put_utf8('bar', unicode_string)
59
self.assertEqual(unicode_string,
60
self.lockable.get_utf8('bar').read())
61
self.assertEqual(byte_string,
62
self.lockable.get('bar').read())
64
self.lockable.unlock()
59
self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
60
unicode_string = u'bar\u1234'
61
self.assertEqual(4, len(unicode_string))
62
byte_string = unicode_string.encode('utf-8')
63
self.assertEqual(6, len(byte_string))
64
self.assertRaises(UnicodeEncodeError,
66
deprecated_in((1, 6, 0)),
67
self.lockable.put, 'foo',
68
StringIO(unicode_string))
70
deprecated_in((1, 6, 0)),
72
'foo', StringIO(byte_string))
73
byte_stream = self.applyDeprecated(
74
deprecated_in((1, 5, 0)),
77
self.assertEqual(byte_string, byte_stream.read())
78
unicode_stream = self.applyDeprecated(
79
deprecated_in((1, 5, 0)),
80
self.lockable.get_utf8,
82
self.assertEqual(unicode_string,
83
unicode_stream.read())
84
self.assertRaises(BzrBadParameterNotString,
86
deprecated_in((1, 6, 0)),
87
self.lockable.put_utf8,
89
StringIO(unicode_string))
91
deprecated_in((1, 6, 0)),
92
self.lockable.put_utf8,
95
unicode_stream = self.applyDeprecated(
96
deprecated_in((1, 5, 0)),
97
self.lockable.get_utf8,
99
self.assertEqual(unicode_string,
100
unicode_stream.read())
101
byte_stream = self.applyDeprecated(
102
deprecated_in((1, 5, 0)),
105
self.assertEqual(byte_string, byte_stream.read())
106
self.applyDeprecated(
107
deprecated_in((1, 6, 0)),
108
self.lockable.put_bytes,
109
'raw', 'raw\xffbytes')
110
byte_stream = self.applyDeprecated(
111
deprecated_in((1, 5, 0)),
114
self.assertEqual('raw\xffbytes', byte_stream.read())
66
116
def test_locks(self):
67
117
self.lockable.lock_read()
69
self.assertRaises(ReadOnlyError, self.lockable.put, 'foo',
70
StringIO('bar\u1234'))
72
self.lockable.unlock()
118
self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
119
self.assertRaises(ReadOnlyError, self.lockable.put, 'foo',
120
StringIO('bar\u1234'))
74
122
def test_transactions(self):
75
123
self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
122
170
self.assertRaises(errors.LockBroken, self.lockable.unlock)
123
171
self.assertFalse(self.lockable.is_locked())
126
# This method of adapting tests to parameters is different to
127
# the TestProviderAdapters used elsewhere, but seems simpler for this
173
def test_lock_write_returns_None_refuses_token(self):
174
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
175
self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
176
if token is not None:
177
# This test does not apply, because this lockable supports
179
raise TestNotApplicable("%r uses tokens" % (self.lockable,))
180
self.assertRaises(errors.TokenLockingNotSupported,
181
self.lockable.lock_write, token='token')
183
def test_lock_write_returns_token_when_given_token(self):
184
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
185
self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
187
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
190
new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
191
token_from_new_lockable = new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
192
self.addCleanup(new_lockable.unlock)
193
self.assertEqual(token, token_from_new_lockable)
195
def test_lock_write_raises_on_token_mismatch(self):
196
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
197
self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
199
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
202
different_token = token + 'xxx'
203
# Re-using the same lockable instance with a different token will
204
# raise TokenMismatch.
205
self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
206
self.lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
207
# A separate instance for the same lockable will also raise
209
# This detects the case where a caller claims to have a lock (via
210
# the token) for an external resource, but doesn't (the token is
211
# different). Clients need a separate lock object to make sure the
212
# external resource is probed, whereas the existing lock object
214
new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
215
self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
216
new_lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
218
def test_lock_write_with_matching_token(self):
219
# If the token matches, so no exception is raised by lock_write.
220
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
221
self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
223
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
226
# The same instance will accept a second lock_write if the specified
228
self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
229
self.lockable.unlock()
230
# Calling lock_write on a new instance for the same lockable will
232
new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
233
new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
234
new_lockable.unlock()
236
def test_unlock_after_lock_write_with_token(self):
237
# If lock_write did not physically acquire the lock (because it was
238
# passed a token), then unlock should not physically release it.
239
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
240
self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
242
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
245
new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
246
new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
247
new_lockable.unlock()
248
self.assertTrue(self.lockable.get_physical_lock_status())
250
def test_lock_write_with_token_fails_when_unlocked(self):
251
# Lock and unlock to get a superficially valid token. This mimics a
252
# likely programming error, where a caller accidentally tries to lock
253
# with a token that is no longer valid (because the original lock was
255
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
256
self.lockable.unlock()
258
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
262
self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
263
self.lockable.lock_write, token=token)
265
def test_lock_write_reenter_with_token(self):
266
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
269
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
272
# Relock with a token.
273
token_from_reentry = self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
275
self.assertEqual(token, token_from_reentry)
277
self.lockable.unlock()
279
self.lockable.unlock()
280
# The lock should be unlocked on disk. Verify that with a new lock
282
new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
283
# Calling lock_write now should work, rather than raise LockContention.
284
new_lockable.lock_write()
285
new_lockable.unlock()
287
def test_second_lock_write_returns_same_token(self):
288
first_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
290
if first_token is None:
291
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
294
# Relock the already locked lockable. It should return the same
296
second_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
298
self.assertEqual(first_token, second_token)
300
self.lockable.unlock()
302
self.lockable.unlock()
304
def test_leave_in_place(self):
305
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
308
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
311
self.lockable.leave_in_place()
313
self.lockable.unlock()
314
# At this point, the lock is still in place on disk
315
self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, self.lockable.lock_write)
316
# But should be relockable with a token.
317
self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
318
self.lockable.unlock()
319
# Cleanup: we should still be able to get the lock, but we restore the
320
# behavior to clearing the lock when unlocking.
321
self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
322
self.lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
323
self.lockable.unlock()
325
def test_dont_leave_in_place(self):
326
token = self.lockable.lock_write()
329
# This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
332
self.lockable.leave_in_place()
334
self.lockable.unlock()
335
# At this point, the lock is still in place on disk.
336
# Acquire the existing lock with the token, and ask that it is removed
337
# when this object unlocks, and unlock to trigger that removal.
338
new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
339
new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
340
new_lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
341
new_lockable.unlock()
342
# At this point, the lock is no longer on disk, so we can lock it.
343
third_lockable = self.get_lockable()
344
third_lockable.lock_write()
345
third_lockable.unlock()
348
# This method of adapting tests to parameters is different to
349
# the TestProviderAdapters used elsewhere, but seems simpler for this
129
351
class TestLockableFiles_TransportLock(TestCaseInTempDir,
130
352
_TestLockableFiles_mixin):
133
super(TestLockableFiles_TransportLock, self).setUp()
355
TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
134
356
transport = get_transport('.')
135
357
transport.mkdir('.bzr')
136
358
self.sub_transport = transport.clone('.bzr')
141
363
super(TestLockableFiles_TransportLock, self).tearDown()
142
364
# free the subtransport so that we do not get a 5 second
143
365
# timeout due to the SFTP connection cache.
144
del self.sub_transport
367
del self.sub_transport
368
except AttributeError:
146
371
def get_lockable(self):
147
372
return LockableFiles(self.sub_transport, 'my-lock', TransportLock)
150
375
class TestLockableFiles_LockDir(TestCaseInTempDir,
151
376
_TestLockableFiles_mixin):
152
377
"""LockableFile tests run with LockDir underneath"""
155
super(TestLockableFiles_LockDir, self).setUp()
380
TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
156
381
self.transport = get_transport('.')
157
382
self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
158
# the lock creation here sets mode - test_permissions on branch
159
# tests that implicitly, but it might be a good idea to factor
383
# the lock creation here sets mode - test_permissions on branch
384
# tests that implicitly, but it might be a good idea to factor
160
385
# out the mode checking logic and have it applied to loackable files
161
386
# directly. RBC 20060418
162
387
self.lockable.create_lock()
164
389
def get_lockable(self):
165
return LockableFiles(self.transport, 'my-lock', LockDir)
390
return LockableFiles(self.transport, 'my-lock', lockdir.LockDir)
167
392
def test_lock_created(self):
168
393
self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
172
397
self.assertFalse(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
173
398
self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
176
# TODO: Test the lockdir inherits the right file and directory permissions
177
# from the LockableFiles.
400
def test__file_modes(self):
401
self.transport.mkdir('readonly')
402
osutils.make_readonly('readonly')
403
lockable = LockableFiles(self.transport.clone('readonly'), 'test-lock',
405
# The directory mode should be read-write-execute for the current user
406
self.assertEqual(00700, lockable._dir_mode & 00700)
407
# Files should be read-write for the current user
408
self.assertEqual(00600, lockable._file_mode & 00700)
411
class TestLockableFiles_RemoteLockDir(TestCaseWithSmartMedium,
412
_TestLockableFiles_mixin):
413
"""LockableFile tests run with RemoteLockDir on a branch."""
416
TestCaseWithSmartMedium.setUp(self)
417
# can only get a RemoteLockDir with some RemoteObject...
418
# use a branch as thats what we want. These mixin tests test the end
419
# to end behaviour, so stubbing out the backend and simulating would
420
# defeat the purpose. We test the protocol implementation separately
421
# in test_remote and test_smart as usual.
422
b = self.make_branch('foo')
423
self.addCleanup(b.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
424
self.transport = get_transport('.')
425
self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
427
def get_lockable(self):
428
# getting a new lockable involves opening a new instance of the branch
429
branch = bzrlib.branch.Branch.open(self.get_url('foo'))
430
self.addCleanup(branch.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
431
return branch.control_files