~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev

« back to all changes in this revision

Viewing changes to bzrlib/tests/test_lockable_files.py

  • Committer: Alexander Belchenko
  • Date: 2007-07-03 17:12:17 UTC
  • mto: This revision was merged to the branch mainline in revision 2582.
  • Revision ID: bialix@ukr.net-20070703171217-8vypfjd2uso3air0
Build pyrex/C extensions for bzr.exe

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context:
 
1
# Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Canonical Ltd
 
2
#
 
3
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 
4
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 
5
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
 
6
# (at your option) any later version.
 
7
#
 
8
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 
9
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 
10
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 
11
# GNU General Public License for more details.
 
12
#
 
13
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 
14
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
 
15
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
 
16
 
 
17
from StringIO import StringIO
 
18
 
 
19
import bzrlib
 
20
import bzrlib.errors as errors
 
21
from bzrlib.errors import BzrBadParameterNotString, NoSuchFile, ReadOnlyError
 
22
from bzrlib.lockable_files import LockableFiles, TransportLock
 
23
from bzrlib import lockdir
 
24
from bzrlib.lockdir import LockDir
 
25
from bzrlib.tests import TestCaseInTempDir
 
26
from bzrlib.tests.test_smart import TestCaseWithSmartMedium
 
27
from bzrlib.tests.test_transactions import DummyWeave
 
28
from bzrlib.transactions import (PassThroughTransaction,
 
29
                                 ReadOnlyTransaction,
 
30
                                 WriteTransaction,
 
31
                                 )
 
32
from bzrlib.transport import get_transport
 
33
 
 
34
 
 
35
# these tests are applied in each parameterized suite for LockableFiles
 
36
class _TestLockableFiles_mixin(object):
 
37
 
 
38
    def test_read_write(self):
 
39
        self.assertRaises(NoSuchFile, self.lockable.get, 'foo')
 
40
        self.assertRaises(NoSuchFile, self.lockable.get_utf8, 'foo')
 
41
        self.lockable.lock_write()
 
42
        try:
 
43
            unicode_string = u'bar\u1234'
 
44
            self.assertEqual(4, len(unicode_string))
 
45
            byte_string = unicode_string.encode('utf-8')
 
46
            self.assertEqual(6, len(byte_string))
 
47
            self.assertRaises(UnicodeEncodeError, self.lockable.put, 'foo',
 
48
                              StringIO(unicode_string))
 
49
            self.lockable.put('foo', StringIO(byte_string))
 
50
            self.assertEqual(byte_string,
 
51
                             self.lockable.get('foo').read())
 
52
            self.assertEqual(unicode_string,
 
53
                             self.lockable.get_utf8('foo').read())
 
54
            self.assertRaises(BzrBadParameterNotString,
 
55
                              self.lockable.put_utf8,
 
56
                              'bar',
 
57
                              StringIO(unicode_string)
 
58
                              )
 
59
            self.lockable.put_utf8('bar', unicode_string)
 
60
            self.assertEqual(unicode_string,
 
61
                             self.lockable.get_utf8('bar').read())
 
62
            self.assertEqual(byte_string,
 
63
                             self.lockable.get('bar').read())
 
64
            self.lockable.put_bytes('raw', 'raw\xffbytes')
 
65
            self.assertEqual('raw\xffbytes',
 
66
                             self.lockable.get('raw').read())
 
67
        finally:
 
68
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
69
 
 
70
    def test_locks(self):
 
71
        self.lockable.lock_read()
 
72
        try:
 
73
            self.assertRaises(ReadOnlyError, self.lockable.put, 'foo', 
 
74
                              StringIO('bar\u1234'))
 
75
        finally:
 
76
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
77
 
 
78
    def test_transactions(self):
 
79
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
80
                      PassThroughTransaction)
 
81
        self.lockable.lock_read()
 
82
        try:
 
83
            self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
84
                          ReadOnlyTransaction)
 
85
        finally:
 
86
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
87
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
88
                      PassThroughTransaction)
 
89
        self.lockable.lock_write()
 
90
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
 
91
                      WriteTransaction)
 
92
        # check that finish is called:
 
93
        vf = DummyWeave('a')
 
94
        self.lockable.get_transaction().register_dirty(vf)
 
95
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
96
        self.assertTrue(vf.finished)
 
97
 
 
98
    def test__escape(self):
 
99
        self.assertEqual('%25', self.lockable._escape('%'))
 
100
        
 
101
    def test__escape_empty(self):
 
102
        self.assertEqual('', self.lockable._escape(''))
 
103
 
 
104
    def test_break_lock(self):
 
105
        # some locks are not breakable
 
106
        self.lockable.lock_write()
 
107
        try:
 
108
            self.assertRaises(AssertionError, self.lockable.break_lock)
 
109
        except NotImplementedError:
 
110
            # this lock cannot be broken
 
111
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
112
            return
 
113
        l2 = self.get_lockable()
 
114
        orig_factory = bzrlib.ui.ui_factory
 
115
        # silent ui - no need for stdout
 
116
        bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = bzrlib.ui.SilentUIFactory()
 
117
        bzrlib.ui.ui_factory.stdin = StringIO("y\n")
 
118
        try:
 
119
            l2.break_lock()
 
120
        finally:
 
121
            bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = orig_factory
 
122
        try:
 
123
            l2.lock_write()
 
124
            l2.unlock()
 
125
        finally:
 
126
            self.assertRaises(errors.LockBroken, self.lockable.unlock)
 
127
            self.assertFalse(self.lockable.is_locked())
 
128
 
 
129
    def test_lock_write_returns_None_refuses_token(self):
 
130
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
131
        try:
 
132
            if token is not None:
 
133
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable supports
 
134
                # tokens.
 
135
                return
 
136
            self.assertRaises(errors.TokenLockingNotSupported,
 
137
                              self.lockable.lock_write, token='token')
 
138
        finally:
 
139
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
140
 
 
141
    def test_lock_write_returns_token_when_given_token(self):
 
142
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
143
        try:
 
144
            if token is None:
 
145
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
146
                # tokens.
 
147
                return
 
148
            new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
149
            token_from_new_lockable = new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
150
            try:
 
151
                self.assertEqual(token, token_from_new_lockable)
 
152
            finally:
 
153
                new_lockable.unlock()
 
154
        finally:
 
155
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
156
 
 
157
    def test_lock_write_raises_on_token_mismatch(self):
 
158
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
159
        try:
 
160
            if token is None:
 
161
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
162
                # tokens.
 
163
                return
 
164
            different_token = token + 'xxx'
 
165
            # Re-using the same lockable instance with a different token will
 
166
            # raise TokenMismatch.
 
167
            self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
 
168
                              self.lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
 
169
            # A seperate instance for the same lockable will also raise
 
170
            # TokenMismatch.
 
171
            # This detects the case where a caller claims to have a lock (via
 
172
            # the token) for an external resource, but doesn't (the token is
 
173
            # different).  Clients need a seperate lock object to make sure the
 
174
            # external resource is probed, whereas the existing lock object
 
175
            # might cache.
 
176
            new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
177
            self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
 
178
                              new_lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
 
179
        finally:
 
180
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
181
 
 
182
    def test_lock_write_with_matching_token(self):
 
183
        # If the token matches, so no exception is raised by lock_write.
 
184
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
185
        try:
 
186
            if token is None:
 
187
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
188
                # tokens.
 
189
                return
 
190
            # The same instance will accept a second lock_write if the specified
 
191
            # token matches.
 
192
            self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
193
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
194
            # Calling lock_write on a new instance for the same lockable will
 
195
            # also succeed.
 
196
            new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
197
            new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
198
            new_lockable.unlock()
 
199
        finally:
 
200
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
201
 
 
202
    def test_unlock_after_lock_write_with_token(self):
 
203
        # If lock_write did not physically acquire the lock (because it was
 
204
        # passed a token), then unlock should not physically release it.
 
205
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
206
        try:
 
207
            if token is None:
 
208
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
209
                # tokens.
 
210
                return
 
211
            new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
212
            new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
213
            new_lockable.unlock()
 
214
            self.assertTrue(self.lockable.get_physical_lock_status())
 
215
        finally:
 
216
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
217
 
 
218
    def test_lock_write_with_token_fails_when_unlocked(self):
 
219
        # Lock and unlock to get a superficially valid token.  This mimics a
 
220
        # likely programming error, where a caller accidentally tries to lock
 
221
        # with a token that is no longer valid (because the original lock was
 
222
        # released).
 
223
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
224
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
225
        if token is None:
 
226
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
227
            # tokens.
 
228
            return
 
229
 
 
230
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
 
231
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token=token)
 
232
 
 
233
    def test_lock_write_reenter_with_token(self):
 
234
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
235
        try:
 
236
            if token is None:
 
237
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
238
                # tokens.
 
239
                return
 
240
            # Relock with a token.
 
241
            token_from_reentry = self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
242
            try:
 
243
                self.assertEqual(token, token_from_reentry)
 
244
            finally:
 
245
                self.lockable.unlock()
 
246
        finally:
 
247
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
248
        # The lock should be unlocked on disk.  Verify that with a new lock
 
249
        # instance.
 
250
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
251
        # Calling lock_write now should work, rather than raise LockContention.
 
252
        new_lockable.lock_write()
 
253
        new_lockable.unlock()
 
254
 
 
255
    def test_second_lock_write_returns_same_token(self):
 
256
        first_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
257
        try:
 
258
            if first_token is None:
 
259
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
260
                # tokens.
 
261
                return
 
262
            # Relock the already locked lockable.  It should return the same
 
263
            # token.
 
264
            second_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
265
            try:
 
266
                self.assertEqual(first_token, second_token)
 
267
            finally:
 
268
                self.lockable.unlock()
 
269
        finally:
 
270
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
271
 
 
272
    def test_leave_in_place(self):
 
273
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
274
        try:
 
275
            if token is None:
 
276
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
277
                # tokens.
 
278
                return
 
279
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
 
280
        finally:
 
281
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
282
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk
 
283
        self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, self.lockable.lock_write)
 
284
        # But should be relockable with a token.
 
285
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
286
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
287
 
 
288
    def test_dont_leave_in_place(self):
 
289
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
 
290
        try:
 
291
            if token is None:
 
292
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
 
293
                # tokens.
 
294
                return
 
295
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
 
296
        finally:
 
297
            self.lockable.unlock()
 
298
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk.
 
299
        # Acquire the existing lock with the token, and ask that it is removed
 
300
        # when this object unlocks, and unlock to trigger that removal.
 
301
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
302
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
 
303
        new_lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
 
304
        new_lockable.unlock()
 
305
        # At this point, the lock is no longer on disk, so we can lock it.
 
306
        third_lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
307
        third_lockable.lock_write()
 
308
        third_lockable.unlock()
 
309
 
 
310
 
 
311
# This method of adapting tests to parameters is different to 
 
312
# the TestProviderAdapters used elsewhere, but seems simpler for this 
 
313
# case.  
 
314
class TestLockableFiles_TransportLock(TestCaseInTempDir,
 
315
                                      _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
 
316
 
 
317
    def setUp(self):
 
318
        TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
 
319
        transport = get_transport('.')
 
320
        transport.mkdir('.bzr')
 
321
        self.sub_transport = transport.clone('.bzr')
 
322
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
323
        self.lockable.create_lock()
 
324
 
 
325
    def tearDown(self):
 
326
        super(TestLockableFiles_TransportLock, self).tearDown()
 
327
        # free the subtransport so that we do not get a 5 second
 
328
        # timeout due to the SFTP connection cache.
 
329
        del self.sub_transport
 
330
 
 
331
    def get_lockable(self):
 
332
        return LockableFiles(self.sub_transport, 'my-lock', TransportLock)
 
333
        
 
334
 
 
335
class TestLockableFiles_LockDir(TestCaseInTempDir,
 
336
                              _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
 
337
    """LockableFile tests run with LockDir underneath"""
 
338
 
 
339
    def setUp(self):
 
340
        TestCaseInTempDir.setUp(self)
 
341
        self.transport = get_transport('.')
 
342
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
343
        # the lock creation here sets mode - test_permissions on branch 
 
344
        # tests that implicitly, but it might be a good idea to factor 
 
345
        # out the mode checking logic and have it applied to loackable files
 
346
        # directly. RBC 20060418
 
347
        self.lockable.create_lock()
 
348
 
 
349
    def get_lockable(self):
 
350
        return LockableFiles(self.transport, 'my-lock', LockDir)
 
351
 
 
352
    def test_lock_created(self):
 
353
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
 
354
        self.lockable.lock_write()
 
355
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
 
356
        self.lockable.unlock()
 
357
        self.assertFalse(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
 
358
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
 
359
 
 
360
 
 
361
    # TODO: Test the lockdir inherits the right file and directory permissions
 
362
    # from the LockableFiles.
 
363
        
 
364
 
 
365
class TestLockableFiles_RemoteLockDir(TestCaseWithSmartMedium,
 
366
                              _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
 
367
    """LockableFile tests run with RemoteLockDir on a branch."""
 
368
 
 
369
    def setUp(self):
 
370
        TestCaseWithSmartMedium.setUp(self)
 
371
        # can only get a RemoteLockDir with some RemoteObject...
 
372
        # use a branch as thats what we want. These mixin tests test the end
 
373
        # to end behaviour, so stubbing out the backend and simulating would
 
374
        # defeat the purpose. We test the protocol implementation separately
 
375
        # in test_remote and test_smart as usual.
 
376
        b = self.make_branch('foo')
 
377
        self.addCleanup(b.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
 
378
        self.transport = get_transport('.')
 
379
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
 
380
 
 
381
    def get_lockable(self):
 
382
        # getting a new lockable involves opening a new instance of the branch
 
383
        branch = bzrlib.branch.Branch.open(self.get_url('foo'))
 
384
        self.addCleanup(branch.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
 
385
        return branch.control_files