187
180
after = time.time()
188
181
# it should only take about 0.4 seconds, but we allow more time in
189
182
# case the machine is heavily loaded
190
self.assertTrue(after - before <= 8.0,
183
self.assertTrue(after - before <= 8.0,
191
184
"took %f seconds to detect lock contention" % (after - before))
194
187
lock_base = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
195
188
self.assertEqual(1, len(self._logged_reports))
196
lock_url = lf2.transport.abspath(lf2.path)
197
189
self.assertEqual('%s %s\n'
199
'Will continue to try until %s, unless '
200
'you press Ctrl-C.\n'
201
'See "bzr help break-lock" for more.',
191
'Will continue to try until %s\n',
202
192
self._logged_reports[0][0])
203
193
args = self._logged_reports[0][1]
204
194
self.assertEqual('Unable to obtain', args[0])
277
267
self.assertEndsWith(args[3], ' ago')
278
268
self.assertContainsRe(args[4], r'\d\d:\d\d:\d\d')
270
def test_33_wait(self):
271
"""Succeed when waiting on a lock that gets released
273
The difference from test_32_lock_wait_succeed is that the second
274
caller does not actually acquire the lock, but just waits for it
275
to be released. This is done over a readonly transport.
277
t = self.get_transport()
278
lf1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
282
def wait_and_unlock():
285
unlocker = Thread(target=wait_and_unlock)
288
lf2 = LockDir(self.get_readonly_transport(), 'test_lock')
290
# wait but don't lock
291
lf2.wait(timeout=0.4, poll=0.1)
293
self.assertTrue(after - before <= 1.0)
280
297
def test_34_lock_write_waits(self):
281
"""LockDir.lock_write() will wait for the lock."""
298
"""LockDir.lock_write() will wait for the lock."""
282
299
# the test suite sets the default to 0 to make deadlocks fail fast.
283
300
# change it for this test, as we want to try a manual deadlock.
284
raise tests.TestSkipped('Timing-sensitive test')
285
301
bzrlib.lockdir._DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 300
286
302
t = self.get_transport()
287
303
lf1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
322
338
def test_35_wait_lock_changing(self):
323
339
"""LockDir.wait_lock() will report if the lock changes underneath.
325
341
This is the stages we want to happen:
327
343
0) Synchronization locks are created and locked.
328
344
1) Lock1 obtains the lockdir, and releases the 'check' lock.
329
345
2) Lock2 grabs the 'check' lock, and checks the lockdir.
330
It sees the lockdir is already acquired, reports the fact,
346
It sees the lockdir is already acquired, reports the fact,
331
347
and unsets the 'checked' lock.
332
348
3) Thread1 blocks on acquiring the 'checked' lock, and then tells
333
349
Lock1 to release and acquire the lockdir. This resets the 'check'
335
351
4) Lock2 acquires the 'check' lock, and checks again. It notices
336
that the holder of the lock has changed, and so reports a new
352
that the holder of the lock has changed, and so reports a new
338
354
5) Thread1 blocks on the 'checked' lock, this time, it completely
339
355
unlocks the lockdir, allowing Lock2 to acquire the lock.
342
raise tests.KnownFailure(
343
"timing dependency in lock tests (#213182)")
345
358
wait_to_check_lock = Lock()
346
359
wait_until_checked_lock = Lock()
619
624
lock_path = ld1.transport.local_abspath('test_lock')
620
625
os.mkdir(lock_path)
621
626
osutils.make_readonly(lock_path)
622
self.assertRaises(errors.LockFailed, ld1.attempt_lock)
624
def test_lock_by_token(self):
625
ld1 = self.get_lock()
626
token = ld1.lock_write()
627
self.addCleanup(ld1.unlock)
628
self.assertNotEqual(None, token)
629
ld2 = self.get_lock()
630
t2 = ld2.lock_write(token)
631
self.addCleanup(ld2.unlock)
632
self.assertEqual(token, t2)
634
def test_lock_with_buggy_rename(self):
635
# test that lock acquisition handles servers which pretend they
636
# renamed correctly but that actually fail
637
t = transport.get_transport('brokenrename+' + self.get_url())
638
ld1 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
641
ld2 = LockDir(t, 'test_lock')
642
# we should fail to lock
643
e = self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, ld2.attempt_lock)
644
# now the original caller should succeed in unlocking
646
# and there should be nothing left over
647
self.assertEquals([], t.list_dir('test_lock'))
649
def test_failed_lock_leaves_no_trash(self):
650
# if we fail to acquire the lock, we don't leave pending directories
651
# behind -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/109169
652
ld1 = self.get_lock()
653
ld2 = self.get_lock()
654
# should be nothing before we start
656
t = self.get_transport().clone('test_lock')
658
self.assertEquals(a, t.list_dir('.'))
660
# when held, that's all we see
662
self.addCleanup(ld1.unlock)
664
# second guy should fail
665
self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, ld2.attempt_lock)
670
class TestLockDirHooks(TestCaseWithTransport):
673
super(TestLockDirHooks, self).setUp()
677
return LockDir(self.get_transport(), 'test_lock')
679
def record_hook(self, result):
680
self._calls.append(result)
682
def test_LockDir_acquired_success(self):
683
# the LockDir.lock_acquired hook fires when a lock is acquired.
684
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_acquired',
685
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
688
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
689
result = ld.attempt_lock()
690
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
691
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
693
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
695
def test_LockDir_acquired_fail(self):
696
# the LockDir.lock_acquired hook does not fire on failure.
699
ld2 = self.get_lock()
701
# install a lock hook now, when the disk lock is locked
702
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_acquired',
703
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
704
self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, ld.attempt_lock)
705
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
707
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
709
def test_LockDir_released_success(self):
710
# the LockDir.lock_released hook fires when a lock is acquired.
711
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_released',
712
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
715
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
716
result = ld.attempt_lock()
717
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
719
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
720
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
722
def test_LockDir_released_fail(self):
723
# the LockDir.lock_released hook does not fire on failure.
726
ld2 = self.get_lock()
728
ld2.force_break(ld2.peek())
729
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_released',
730
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
731
self.assertRaises(LockBroken, ld.unlock)
732
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
734
def test_LockDir_broken_success(self):
735
# the LockDir.lock_broken hook fires when a lock is broken.
738
ld2 = self.get_lock()
739
result = ld.attempt_lock()
740
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_broken',
741
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
742
ld2.force_break(ld2.peek())
743
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
744
self.assertEqual([lock.LockResult(lock_path, result)], self._calls)
746
def test_LockDir_broken_failure(self):
747
# the LockDir.lock_broken hook does not fires when a lock is already
751
ld2 = self.get_lock()
752
result = ld.attempt_lock()
753
holder_info = ld2.peek()
755
LockDir.hooks.install_named_hook('lock_broken',
756
self.record_hook, 'record_hook')
757
ld2.force_break(holder_info)
758
lock_path = ld.transport.abspath(ld.path)
759
self.assertEqual([], self._calls)
627
self.assertRaises(errors.PermissionDenied, ld1.attempt_lock)