1
For a tree holding 2.4.18 (two copies), 2.4.19, 2.4.20
8
12355 .bzr/inventory-store
15
This is actually a pretty bad example because of deleting and
16
re-importing 2.4.18, but still not totally unreasonable.
20
linux-2.4.0: 116399 kB
21
after addding everything: 119505kB
22
bzr status 2.68s user 0.13s system 84% cpu 3.330 total
23
bzr commit 'import 2.4.0' 4.41s user 2.15s system 11% cpu 59.490 total
31
Performance (2005-03-01)
33
To add all files from linux-2.4.18: about 70s, mostly inventory
34
serialization/deserialization.
37
- finished, 6.520u/3.870s cpu, 33.940u/10.730s cum
40
Interesting that it spends so long on external processing! I wonder
41
if this is for running uuidgen? Let's try generating things
44
Great, this cuts it to 17.15s user 0.61s system 83% cpu 21.365 total
45
to add, with no external command time. The commit now seems to spend
46
most of its time copying to disk.
48
- finished, 6.550u/3.320s cpu, 35.050u/9.870s cum
51
I wonder where the external time is now? We were also using uuids()
54
Let's remove everything and re-add. Detecting everything was removed
56
- finished, 2.460u/0.110s cpu, 0.000u/0.000s cum
59
which may be mostly XML deserialization?
61
Just getting the previous revision takes about this long:
63
bzr invoked at Tue 2005-03-01 15:53:05.183741 EST +1100
64
by mbp@sourcefrog.net on hope
65
arguments: ['/home/mbp/bin/bzr', 'get-revision-inventory', 'mbp@sourcefrog.net-20050301044608-8513202ab179aff4-44e8cd52a41aa705']
66
platform: Linux-2.6.10-4-686-i686-with-debian-3.1
67
- finished, 3.910u/0.390s cpu, 0.000u/0.000s cum
70
Now committing the revision which removes all files should be fast.
72
- finished, 1.280u/0.030s cpu, 0.000u/0.000s cum
75
Now re-add with new code that doesn't call uuidgen:
77
- finished, 1.990u/0.030s cpu, 0.000u/0.000s cum
80
16.61s user 0.55s system 74% cpu 22.965 total
84
- finished, 2.500u/0.110s cpu, 0.010u/0.000s cum
89
Now patch up to 2.4.19. There were some bugs in handling missing
90
directories, but with that fixed we do much better::
92
bzr status 5.86s user 1.06s system 10% cpu 1:05.55 total
94
This is slow because it's diffing every file; we should use mtimes etc
95
to make this faster. The cpu time is reasonable.
97
I see difflib is pure Python; it might be faster to shell out to GNU
100
Export is very fast::
102
- finished, 4.220u/1.480s cpu, 0.010u/0.000s cum
105
bzr export 1 ../linux-2.4.18.export1 3.92s user 1.72s system 21% cpu 26.030 total
108
Now to find and add the new changes::
110
- finished, 2.190u/0.030s cpu, 0.000u/0.000s cum
115
bzr commit 'import 2.4.19' 9.36s user 1.91s system 23% cpu 47.127 total
117
And the result is exactly right. Try exporting::
119
mbp@hope% bzr export 4 ../linux-2.4.19.export4
120
bzr export 4 ../linux-2.4.19.export4 4.21s user 1.70s system 18% cpu 32.304 total
122
and the export is exactly the same as the tarball.
124
Now we can optimize the diff a bit more by not comparing files that
125
have the right SHA-1 from within the commit
129
patch -p1 < ../kernel.pkg/patch-2.4.20 1.61s user 1.03s system 13% cpu 19.106 total
132
Now status after applying the .20 patch. With full-text verification::
134
bzr status 7.07s user 1.32s system 13% cpu 1:04.29 total
136
with that turned off::
138
bzr status 5.86s user 0.56s system 25% cpu 25.577 total
142
bzr status 6.14s user 0.61s system 25% cpu 26.583 total
144
Should add some kind of profile counter for quick compares vs slow
147
bzr commit 'import 2.4.20' 7.57s user 1.36s system 20% cpu 43.568
150
export: finished, 3.940u/1.820s cpu, 0.000u/0.000s cum, 50.990 elapsed
152
also exports correctly
156
bzr commit 'import 2.4.1' 5.59s user 0.51s system 60% cpu 10.122 total
166
with everything through to 2.4.29 imported, the .bzr directory is
167
1132MB, compared to 185MB for one tree. The .bzr.log is 100MB!. So
168
the storage is 6.1 times larger, although we're holding 30 versions.
169
It's pretty large but I think not ridiculous. By contrast the tarball
170
for 2.4.0 is 104MB, and the tarball plus uncompressed patches are
173
Uncompressed, the text store is 1041MB. So it is only three times
174
worse than patches, and could be compressed at presumably roughly
175
equal efficiency. It is large, but also a very simple design and
176
perhaps adequate for the moment. The text store with each file
177
individually gziped is 264MB, which is also a very simple format and
178
makes it less than twice the size of the source tree.
180
This is actually rather pessimistic because I think there are some
181
orphaned texts in there.
183
Measured by du, the compressed full-text store is 363MB; also probably
186
The real fix is perhaps to use some kind of weave, not so much for
187
storage efficiency as for fast annotation and therefore possible
188
annotation-based merge.
195
Now we have recursive add, add is much faster. Adding all of the
196
linux 2.4.19 kernel tree takes only
198
finished, 5.460u/0.610s cpu, 0.010u/0.000s cum, 6.710 elapsed
201
However, the store code currently flushes to disk after every write,
202
which is probably excessive. So a commit takes
204
finished, 8.740u/3.950s cpu, 0.010u/0.000s cum, 156.420 elapsed
207
Status is now also quite fast, depsite that it still has to read all
210
mbp@hope% bzr status ~/work/linux-2.4.19
211
bzr status 5.51s user 0.79s system 99% cpu 6.337 total
213
strace shows much of this is in write(2), probably because of
214
logging. With more buffering on that file, removing all the explicit
215
flushes, that is reduced to
217
mbp@hope% time bzr status
218
bzr status 5.23s user 0.42s system 97% cpu 5.780 total
220
which is mostly opening, stating and reading files, as it should be.
221
Still a few too many stat calls.
223
Now fixed up handling of root directory.
225
Without flushing everything to disk as it goes into the store:
227
mbp@hope% bzr commit -m 'import linux 2.4.19'
228
bzr commit -m 'import linux 2.4.19' 8.15s user 2.09s system 53% cpu 19.295 total
230
mbp@hope% time bzr diff
231
bzr diff 5.80s user 0.52s system 69% cpu 9.128 total
232
mbp@hope% time bzr status
233
bzr status 5.64s user 0.43s system 68% cpu 8.848 total
235
patch -p1 < ../linux.pkg/patch-2.4.20 1.67s user 0.96s system 90% cpu 2.905 total
237
The diff changes 3462 files according to diffstat.
239
branch format: Bazaar-NG branch, format 0.0.4
249
614 versioned subdirectories
251
That is, 3510 entries have changed, but there are 48 changed
252
directories so the count is exactly right!
254
bzr commit -v -m 'import 2.4.20' 8.23s user 1.09s system 48% cpu 19.411 total
256
Kind of strange that this takes as much time as committing the whole
257
thing; I suppose it has to read every file.
259
This shows many files as being renamed; I don't know why that would
265
2969 files changed, 366643 insertions(+), 147759 deletions(-)
269
2969 files changed, 372168 insertions(+), 153284 deletions(-)
271
I wonder why it is not exactly the same? Maybe because the python
272
diff algorithm is a bit differnt to GNU diff.
278
full check, retrieving all file texts once for the 2.4 kernel branch
279
takes 10m elapsed, 1m cpu time. lots of random IO and seeking.
284
mbp@hope% time python =bzr deleted --show-ids
285
README README-fa1d8447b4fd0140-adbf4342752f0fc3
286
python =bzr deleted --show-ids 1.55s user 0.09s system 96% cpu 1.701 total
287
mbp@hope% time python -O =bzr deleted --show-ids
288
README README-fa1d8447b4fd0140-adbf4342752f0fc3
289
python -O =bzr deleted --show-ids 1.47s user 0.10s system 101% cpu 1.547 total
290
mbp@hope% time python -O =bzr deleted --show-ids
291
README README-fa1d8447b4fd0140-adbf4342752f0fc3
292
python -O =bzr deleted --show-ids 1.49s user 0.07s system 99% cpu 1.565 total
293
mbp@hope% time python =bzr deleted --show-ids
294
README README-fa1d8447b4fd0140-adbf4342752f0fc3
295
python =bzr deleted --show-ids 1.55s user 0.08s system 99% cpu 1.637 total
297
small but significant improvement from Python -O
added
removed
notes/performance.txt
