~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev

« back to all changes in this revision

Viewing changes to bzrlib/tests/test_lockable_files.py

  • Committer: mbp at sourcefrog
  • Date: 2005-03-09 07:14:22 UTC
  • Revision ID: mbp@sourcefrog.net-20050309071421-eb5d3514d415bc4c
write inventory to temporary file and atomically replace

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context:
1
 
# Copyright (C) 2005-2011 Canonical Ltd
2
 
#
3
 
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4
 
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5
 
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
6
 
# (at your option) any later version.
7
 
#
8
 
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9
 
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10
 
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
11
 
# GNU General Public License for more details.
12
 
#
13
 
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14
 
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
15
 
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
16
 
 
17
 
import bzrlib
18
 
from bzrlib import (
19
 
    errors,
20
 
    lockdir,
21
 
    osutils,
22
 
    transport,
23
 
    )
24
 
from bzrlib.lockable_files import LockableFiles, TransportLock
25
 
from bzrlib.tests import (
26
 
    TestCaseInTempDir,
27
 
    TestNotApplicable,
28
 
    )
29
 
from bzrlib.tests.test_smart import TestCaseWithSmartMedium
30
 
from bzrlib.tests.test_transactions import DummyWeave
31
 
from bzrlib.transactions import (PassThroughTransaction,
32
 
                                 ReadOnlyTransaction,
33
 
                                 WriteTransaction,
34
 
                                 )
35
 
 
36
 
 
37
 
# these tests are applied in each parameterized suite for LockableFiles
38
 
#
39
 
# they use an old style of parameterization, but we want to remove this class
40
 
# so won't modernize them now. - mbp 20080430
41
 
class _TestLockableFiles_mixin(object):
42
 
 
43
 
    def test_transactions(self):
44
 
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
45
 
                      PassThroughTransaction)
46
 
        self.lockable.lock_read()
47
 
        try:
48
 
            self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
49
 
                          ReadOnlyTransaction)
50
 
        finally:
51
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
52
 
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
53
 
                      PassThroughTransaction)
54
 
        self.lockable.lock_write()
55
 
        self.assertIs(self.lockable.get_transaction().__class__,
56
 
                      WriteTransaction)
57
 
        # check that finish is called:
58
 
        vf = DummyWeave('a')
59
 
        self.lockable.get_transaction().register_dirty(vf)
60
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
61
 
        self.assertTrue(vf.finished)
62
 
 
63
 
    def test__escape(self):
64
 
        self.assertEqual('%25', self.lockable._escape('%'))
65
 
 
66
 
    def test__escape_empty(self):
67
 
        self.assertEqual('', self.lockable._escape(''))
68
 
 
69
 
    def test_break_lock(self):
70
 
        # some locks are not breakable
71
 
        self.lockable.lock_write()
72
 
        try:
73
 
            self.assertRaises(AssertionError, self.lockable.break_lock)
74
 
        except NotImplementedError:
75
 
            # this lock cannot be broken
76
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
77
 
            raise TestNotApplicable("%r is not breakable" % (self.lockable,))
78
 
        l2 = self.get_lockable()
79
 
        orig_factory = bzrlib.ui.ui_factory
80
 
        # silent ui - no need for stdout
81
 
        bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = bzrlib.ui.CannedInputUIFactory([True])
82
 
        try:
83
 
            l2.break_lock()
84
 
        finally:
85
 
            bzrlib.ui.ui_factory = orig_factory
86
 
        try:
87
 
            l2.lock_write()
88
 
            l2.unlock()
89
 
        finally:
90
 
            self.assertRaises(errors.LockBroken, self.lockable.unlock)
91
 
            self.assertFalse(self.lockable.is_locked())
92
 
 
93
 
    def test_lock_write_returns_None_refuses_token(self):
94
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
95
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
96
 
        if token is not None:
97
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable supports
98
 
            # tokens.
99
 
            raise TestNotApplicable("%r uses tokens" % (self.lockable,))
100
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenLockingNotSupported,
101
 
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token='token')
102
 
 
103
 
    def test_lock_write_returns_token_when_given_token(self):
104
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
105
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
106
 
        if token is None:
107
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
108
 
            # tokens.
109
 
            return
110
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
111
 
        token_from_new_lockable = new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
112
 
        self.addCleanup(new_lockable.unlock)
113
 
        self.assertEqual(token, token_from_new_lockable)
114
 
 
115
 
    def test_lock_write_raises_on_token_mismatch(self):
116
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
117
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
118
 
        if token is None:
119
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
120
 
            # tokens.
121
 
            return
122
 
        different_token = token + 'xxx'
123
 
        # Re-using the same lockable instance with a different token will
124
 
        # raise TokenMismatch.
125
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
126
 
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
127
 
        # A separate instance for the same lockable will also raise
128
 
        # TokenMismatch.
129
 
        # This detects the case where a caller claims to have a lock (via
130
 
        # the token) for an external resource, but doesn't (the token is
131
 
        # different).  Clients need a separate lock object to make sure the
132
 
        # external resource is probed, whereas the existing lock object
133
 
        # might cache.
134
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
135
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
136
 
                          new_lockable.lock_write, token=different_token)
137
 
 
138
 
    def test_lock_write_with_matching_token(self):
139
 
        # If the token matches, so no exception is raised by lock_write.
140
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
141
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
142
 
        if token is None:
143
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
144
 
            # tokens.
145
 
            return
146
 
        # The same instance will accept a second lock_write if the specified
147
 
        # token matches.
148
 
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
149
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
150
 
        # Calling lock_write on a new instance for the same lockable will
151
 
        # also succeed.
152
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
153
 
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
154
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
155
 
 
156
 
    def test_unlock_after_lock_write_with_token(self):
157
 
        # If lock_write did not physically acquire the lock (because it was
158
 
        # passed a token), then unlock should not physically release it.
159
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
160
 
        self.addCleanup(self.lockable.unlock)
161
 
        if token is None:
162
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
163
 
            # tokens.
164
 
            return
165
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
166
 
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
167
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
168
 
        self.assertTrue(self.lockable.get_physical_lock_status())
169
 
 
170
 
    def test_lock_write_with_token_fails_when_unlocked(self):
171
 
        # Lock and unlock to get a superficially valid token.  This mimics a
172
 
        # likely programming error, where a caller accidentally tries to lock
173
 
        # with a token that is no longer valid (because the original lock was
174
 
        # released).
175
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
176
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
177
 
        if token is None:
178
 
            # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
179
 
            # tokens.
180
 
            return
181
 
 
182
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.TokenMismatch,
183
 
                          self.lockable.lock_write, token=token)
184
 
 
185
 
    def test_lock_write_reenter_with_token(self):
186
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
187
 
        try:
188
 
            if token is None:
189
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
190
 
                # tokens.
191
 
                return
192
 
            # Relock with a token.
193
 
            token_from_reentry = self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
194
 
            try:
195
 
                self.assertEqual(token, token_from_reentry)
196
 
            finally:
197
 
                self.lockable.unlock()
198
 
        finally:
199
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
200
 
        # The lock should be unlocked on disk.  Verify that with a new lock
201
 
        # instance.
202
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
203
 
        # Calling lock_write now should work, rather than raise LockContention.
204
 
        new_lockable.lock_write()
205
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
206
 
 
207
 
    def test_second_lock_write_returns_same_token(self):
208
 
        first_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
209
 
        try:
210
 
            if first_token is None:
211
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
212
 
                # tokens.
213
 
                return
214
 
            # Relock the already locked lockable.  It should return the same
215
 
            # token.
216
 
            second_token = self.lockable.lock_write()
217
 
            try:
218
 
                self.assertEqual(first_token, second_token)
219
 
            finally:
220
 
                self.lockable.unlock()
221
 
        finally:
222
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
223
 
 
224
 
    def test_leave_in_place(self):
225
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
226
 
        try:
227
 
            if token is None:
228
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
229
 
                # tokens.
230
 
                return
231
 
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
232
 
        finally:
233
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
234
 
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk
235
 
        self.assertRaises(errors.LockContention, self.lockable.lock_write)
236
 
        # But should be relockable with a token.
237
 
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
238
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
239
 
        # Cleanup: we should still be able to get the lock, but we restore the
240
 
        # behavior to clearing the lock when unlocking.
241
 
        self.lockable.lock_write(token=token)
242
 
        self.lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
243
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
244
 
 
245
 
    def test_dont_leave_in_place(self):
246
 
        token = self.lockable.lock_write()
247
 
        try:
248
 
            if token is None:
249
 
                # This test does not apply, because this lockable refuses
250
 
                # tokens.
251
 
                return
252
 
            self.lockable.leave_in_place()
253
 
        finally:
254
 
            self.lockable.unlock()
255
 
        # At this point, the lock is still in place on disk.
256
 
        # Acquire the existing lock with the token, and ask that it is removed
257
 
        # when this object unlocks, and unlock to trigger that removal.
258
 
        new_lockable = self.get_lockable()
259
 
        new_lockable.lock_write(token=token)
260
 
        new_lockable.dont_leave_in_place()
261
 
        new_lockable.unlock()
262
 
        # At this point, the lock is no longer on disk, so we can lock it.
263
 
        third_lockable = self.get_lockable()
264
 
        third_lockable.lock_write()
265
 
        third_lockable.unlock()
266
 
 
267
 
 
268
 
# This method of adapting tests to parameters is different to
269
 
# the TestProviderAdapters used elsewhere, but seems simpler for this
270
 
# case.
271
 
class TestLockableFiles_TransportLock(TestCaseInTempDir,
272
 
                                      _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
273
 
 
274
 
    def setUp(self):
275
 
        super(TestLockableFiles_TransportLock, self).setUp()
276
 
        t = transport.get_transport_from_path('.')
277
 
        t.mkdir('.bzr')
278
 
        self.sub_transport = t.clone('.bzr')
279
 
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
280
 
        self.lockable.create_lock()
281
 
 
282
 
    def stop_server(self):
283
 
        super(TestLockableFiles_TransportLock, self).stop_server()
284
 
        # free the subtransport so that we do not get a 5 second
285
 
        # timeout due to the SFTP connection cache.
286
 
        try:
287
 
            del self.sub_transport
288
 
        except AttributeError:
289
 
            pass
290
 
 
291
 
    def get_lockable(self):
292
 
        return LockableFiles(self.sub_transport, 'my-lock', TransportLock)
293
 
 
294
 
 
295
 
class TestLockableFiles_LockDir(TestCaseInTempDir,
296
 
                                _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
297
 
    """LockableFile tests run with LockDir underneath"""
298
 
 
299
 
    def setUp(self):
300
 
        super(TestLockableFiles_LockDir, self).setUp()
301
 
        self.transport = transport.get_transport_from_path('.')
302
 
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
303
 
        # the lock creation here sets mode - test_permissions on branch
304
 
        # tests that implicitly, but it might be a good idea to factor
305
 
        # out the mode checking logic and have it applied to loackable files
306
 
        # directly. RBC 20060418
307
 
        self.lockable.create_lock()
308
 
 
309
 
    def get_lockable(self):
310
 
        return LockableFiles(self.transport, 'my-lock', lockdir.LockDir)
311
 
 
312
 
    def test_lock_created(self):
313
 
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
314
 
        self.lockable.lock_write()
315
 
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
316
 
        self.lockable.unlock()
317
 
        self.assertFalse(self.transport.has('my-lock/held/info'))
318
 
        self.assertTrue(self.transport.has('my-lock'))
319
 
 
320
 
    def test__file_modes(self):
321
 
        self.transport.mkdir('readonly')
322
 
        osutils.make_readonly('readonly')
323
 
        lockable = LockableFiles(self.transport.clone('readonly'), 'test-lock',
324
 
                                 lockdir.LockDir)
325
 
        # The directory mode should be read-write-execute for the current user
326
 
        self.assertEqual(00700, lockable._dir_mode & 00700)
327
 
        # Files should be read-write for the current user
328
 
        self.assertEqual(00600, lockable._file_mode & 00700)
329
 
 
330
 
 
331
 
class TestLockableFiles_RemoteLockDir(TestCaseWithSmartMedium,
332
 
                                      _TestLockableFiles_mixin):
333
 
    """LockableFile tests run with RemoteLockDir on a branch."""
334
 
 
335
 
    def setUp(self):
336
 
        super(TestLockableFiles_RemoteLockDir, self).setUp()
337
 
        # can only get a RemoteLockDir with some RemoteObject...
338
 
        # use a branch as thats what we want. These mixin tests test the end
339
 
        # to end behaviour, so stubbing out the backend and simulating would
340
 
        # defeat the purpose. We test the protocol implementation separately
341
 
        # in test_remote and test_smart as usual.
342
 
        b = self.make_branch('foo')
343
 
        self.addCleanup(b.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
344
 
        self.transport = transport.get_transport_from_path('.')
345
 
        self.lockable = self.get_lockable()
346
 
 
347
 
    def get_lockable(self):
348
 
        # getting a new lockable involves opening a new instance of the branch
349
 
        branch = bzrlib.branch.Branch.open(self.get_url('foo'))
350
 
        self.addCleanup(branch.bzrdir.transport.disconnect)
351
 
        return branch.control_files