~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev

5346.2.1 by Martin Pool
Add some developer docs about symlinks and transports towards bug 192859
1
####################################
2
Developer guide to bzrlib transports
3
####################################
4
5
This guide describes the `Transport` classes that Bazaar uses for most
6
local and remote file access.  (Working tree files are the major
5346.2.3 by Martin Pool
review feedback on transport docs
7
exception (`bug 606249 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/606249>`).
5346.2.1 by Martin Pool
Add some developer docs about symlinks and transports towards bug 192859
8
9
10
Handling symlinks
11
#################
12
13
A symlink creates an alias where files or directories can be accessed by a
5346.2.3 by Martin Pool
review feedback on transport docs
14
different name.  Symlinks are useful but raise a few annoying cases for
15
bzr.
5346.2.1 by Martin Pool
Add some developer docs about symlinks and transports towards bug 192859
16
5346.2.3 by Martin Pool
review feedback on transport docs
17
It's important to have tests for symlinks but these tests can't run on
5346.2.1 by Martin Pool
Add some developer docs about symlinks and transports towards bug 192859
18
Windows, so you need eg ::
19
20
    _test_needs_features = [tests.SymlinkFeature]
21
22
or ::
23
24
    self.requireFeature(tests.SymlinkFeature)
25
26
Bazaar versions symlinks as objects in their own right, whose content is
5346.2.3 by Martin Pool
review feedback on transport docs
27
the path they point to.  bzr doesn't care whether a versioned
5346.2.1 by Martin Pool
Add some developer docs about symlinks and transports towards bug 192859
28
symlink is absolute or relative; or whether it points inside or outside
5346.2.3 by Martin Pool
review feedback on transport docs
29
the working tree; or whether its referent exists or not.  In Unix the
30
target of a symlink is a byte string; bzr treats this as a Unicode string
31
in the filesystem encoding (`osutils._fs_enc`).
5346.2.1 by Martin Pool
Add some developer docs about symlinks and transports towards bug 192859
32
33
So when we say ``bzr add symlink``, this should always add the symlink to
34
its containing working tree, and never dereference the symlink.
35
36
However, ``bzr add symlink/file`` shouldn't add ``file`` as a child of
37
``symlink``.  (Symlinks don't have files underneath them: they may point to
38
a directory which contains children, but if the symlink was pointed
39
somewhere else those children would be unaffected.)  This could either add
40
the file in its containing working tree, or fail outright.
41
42
One interesting case for this is ::
43
44
    bzr add ~/dev/bug123/a.c
45
46
where ``~/dev`` is actually a symlink to ``/srv/dev/joe/``.  In this case
47
clearly the user does want us to follow the symlink to open the tree.
48
49
As of bzr2.2, when we open a `WorkingTree`, we typically immediately
50
compute its real path and store that as ``.basedir``, but `BzrDir` stores
51
its apparent path.  (This may not be the best thing.)
52
53
5346.2.2 by Martin Pool
Mention dereference_path
54
Useful functions
55
----------------
56
57
`bzrlib.osutils.dereference_path` does the commonly useful operation of
58
resolving the directory part of a path, but leaving the filename
59
untouched.  In other words ::
60
61
  ln -s x a
62
  ln -s y x/b
63
  dereference_path('a/b') => 'x/b'
64
65
5346.2.1 by Martin Pool
Add some developer docs about symlinks and transports towards bug 192859
66
Relative paths beyond symlinks
67
------------------------------
68
69
Another interesting case is when a control directory contains a relative
70
path, perhaps from a branch to its master or from a working tree to its
71
branch.  If it contains ``../`` parts as it typically will, these may have
72
different effects depending on whether they're looked up relative to the
73
real path or the apparent path given by the user.  It may be that some
74
users expect different behaviours at different times.  
75
76
Resolving the path relative to the real directory makes it somewhat more
77
consistent with what you would see by in a shell entering that directory
78
and then opening the given name.  It may also make things more consistent
79
when there are multiple links to the same bzrdir.  However it may cause
80
problems when using a transport that hides symlinks.
81
82
We could possibly handle this by doing less path arithmetic and asking the
83
OS or server to open the path including ``..`` and other relative
84
elements, but that might cause other problems.  HTTP servers may do their
85
own path arithmetic before passing it to the OS.
86
87
88
Transports that hide symlinks
89
-----------------------------
90
91
On local, sftp and bzr+ssh transports, we can directly see symlinks as
92
symlinks.  Over http (and ftp?) they're expanded by the server and we
93
cannot detect them.  This can cause problems when bzr follows relative
94
paths because typically we will join the paths, and we may do this
95
inconsistently with how the server, which can see the symlinks, would do.
96
97
98
Symlinks and ChrootTransports
99
-----------------------------
100
101
bzr has an internal concept of a `ChrootTransport` that locks access into
102
a particular directory.  Symlinks should not break out of a chroot jail
103
which implies they should be expanded and checked within bzrlib.
104
(At least as long as the transport lets us see the symlink; otherwise it
105
may not be possible.) 
106
107
108
 .. vim: ft=rst sw=4