6
by mbp at sourcefrog
import all docs from arch |
1 |
************ |
2 |
Requirements |
|
3 |
************ |
|
4 |
||
5 |
gcc requirements |
|
6 |
---------------- |
|
7 |
||
8 |
* http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-06/msg00082.html |
|
9 |
* http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg00264.html |
|
10 |
||
11 |
Some of these are: |
|
12 |
||
13 |
* Must preserve existing history from CVS; must be able to export back |
|
14 |
out to CVS in case they change their mind. |
|
15 |
||
16 |
* Support a single central blessed version. |
|
17 |
||
18 |
* Cheap branches and tagging. |
|
19 |
||
20 |
* Handle repeated merges; remember the last time something was merged. |
|
21 |
||
22 |
* Easy cloning. |
|
23 |
||
24 |
* Copy a named patch set (one or more changes) onto a particular |
|
25 |
branch. |
|
26 |
||
27 |
* Unix, Windows, Mac. |
|
28 |
||
29 |
* What patches changed a particular symbol? |
|
30 |
||
31 |
* annotate function that shows deleted lines. |
|
32 |
||
33 |
* Reliable backups. (bzr can do this simply by cloning, then |
|
34 |
mirror-sync.) |
|
35 |
||
36 |
* Scale to enormously wide and long history. |
|
37 |
||
38 |
* Easy to get back to last-known-good state. |
|
39 |
||
40 |
||
41 |
||
42 |
kernel |
|
43 |
------ |
|
44 |
||
45 |
* http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20030323_210.txt |
|
46 |
||
47 |
Discussion of BitKeeper, strengths and weaknesses, and |
|
48 |
interoperation tools. |