2255.2.217
by Martin Pool
docs |
1 |
# Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2007 Canonical Ltd
|
1773.4.1
by Martin Pool
Add pyflakes makefile target; fix many warnings |
2 |
#
|
3 |
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
4 |
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
5 |
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
6 |
# (at your option) any later version.
|
|
7 |
#
|
|
8 |
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
9 |
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
10 |
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
11 |
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
12 |
#
|
|
13 |
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
14 |
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
4183.7.1
by Sabin Iacob
update FSF mailing address |
15 |
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
|
1773.4.1
by Martin Pool
Add pyflakes makefile target; fix many warnings |
16 |
|
1185.1.41
by Robert Collins
massive patch from Alexander Belchenko - many PEP8 fixes, removes unused function uuid |
17 |
import os |
1551.2.23
by Aaron Bentley
Got merge_inner's ignore_zero parameter working |
18 |
from StringIO import StringIO |
1185.1.41
by Robert Collins
massive patch from Alexander Belchenko - many PEP8 fixes, removes unused function uuid |
19 |
|
2221.4.16
by Aaron Bentley
Add tests for get_merge_type_registry |
20 |
from bzrlib import ( |
21 |
conflicts, |
|
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
22 |
errors, |
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
23 |
knit, |
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
24 |
memorytree, |
2221.4.16
by Aaron Bentley
Add tests for get_merge_type_registry |
25 |
merge as _mod_merge, |
26 |
option, |
|
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
27 |
progress, |
3514.4.19
by John Arbash Meinel
Add the _lca_multi_way function, and explicit tests. |
28 |
tests, |
3008.1.21
by Aaron Bentley
Make compute_transform private, test make_preview_transform |
29 |
transform, |
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
30 |
versionedfile, |
2221.4.16
by Aaron Bentley
Add tests for get_merge_type_registry |
31 |
)
|
974.1.56
by aaron.bentley at utoronto
Added merge test |
32 |
from bzrlib.branch import Branch |
1551.7.10
by Aaron Bentley
Remerge doesn't clear unrelated conflicts |
33 |
from bzrlib.conflicts import ConflictList, TextConflict |
1185.24.3
by Aaron Bentley
Integrated reprocessing into the rest of the merge stuff |
34 |
from bzrlib.errors import UnrelatedBranches, NoCommits, BzrCommandError |
3062.1.13
by Aaron Bentley
Make _PlanMerge an implementation detail of _PlanMergeVersionedFile |
35 |
from bzrlib.merge import transform_tree, merge_inner, _PlanMerge |
1959.4.6
by Aaron Bentley
Ensure merge works across kind changes |
36 |
from bzrlib.osutils import pathjoin, file_kind |
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
37 |
from bzrlib.tests import TestCaseWithTransport, TestCaseWithMemoryTransport |
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
38 |
from bzrlib.workingtree import WorkingTree |
39 |
||
40 |
||
41 |
class TestMerge(TestCaseWithTransport): |
|
974.1.56
by aaron.bentley at utoronto
Added merge test |
42 |
"""Test appending more than one revision"""
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
43 |
|
974.1.56
by aaron.bentley at utoronto
Added merge test |
44 |
def test_pending(self): |
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
45 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
1908.6.11
by Robert Collins
Remove usage of tree.pending_merges(). |
46 |
rev_a = wt.commit("lala!") |
47 |
self.assertEqual([rev_a], wt.get_parent_ids()) |
|
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
48 |
self.assertRaises(errors.PointlessMerge, wt.merge_from_branch, |
49 |
wt.branch) |
|
1908.6.11
by Robert Collins
Remove usage of tree.pending_merges(). |
50 |
self.assertEqual([rev_a], wt.get_parent_ids()) |
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
51 |
return wt |
974.1.80
by Aaron Bentley
Improved merge error handling and testing |
52 |
|
1558.4.11
by Aaron Bentley
Allow merge against self, make fetching self a noop |
53 |
def test_undo(self): |
54 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
55 |
wt.commit("lala!") |
|
56 |
wt.commit("haha!") |
|
57 |
wt.commit("blabla!") |
|
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
58 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, wt.branch.get_rev_id(2), |
59 |
wt.branch.get_rev_id(1)) |
|
1558.4.11
by Aaron Bentley
Allow merge against self, make fetching self a noop |
60 |
|
974.1.80
by Aaron Bentley
Improved merge error handling and testing |
61 |
def test_nocommits(self): |
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
62 |
wt = self.test_pending() |
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
63 |
wt2 = self.make_branch_and_tree('branch2') |
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
64 |
self.assertRaises(NoCommits, wt.merge_from_branch, wt2.branch) |
65 |
return wt, wt2 |
|
974.1.80
by Aaron Bentley
Improved merge error handling and testing |
66 |
|
67 |
def test_unrelated(self): |
|
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
68 |
wt, wt2 = self.test_nocommits() |
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
69 |
wt2.commit("blah") |
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
70 |
self.assertRaises(UnrelatedBranches, wt.merge_from_branch, wt2.branch) |
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
71 |
return wt2 |
974.1.80
by Aaron Bentley
Improved merge error handling and testing |
72 |
|
1908.6.11
by Robert Collins
Remove usage of tree.pending_merges(). |
73 |
def test_merge_one_file(self): |
74 |
"""Do a partial merge of a tree which should not affect tree parents."""
|
|
1645.1.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement single-file merge |
75 |
wt1 = self.make_branch_and_tree('branch1') |
1908.6.11
by Robert Collins
Remove usage of tree.pending_merges(). |
76 |
tip = wt1.commit('empty commit') |
1645.1.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement single-file merge |
77 |
wt2 = self.make_branch_and_tree('branch2') |
78 |
wt2.pull(wt1.branch) |
|
79 |
file('branch1/foo', 'wb').write('foo') |
|
80 |
file('branch1/bar', 'wb').write('bar') |
|
81 |
wt1.add('foo') |
|
82 |
wt1.add('bar') |
|
83 |
wt1.commit('add foobar') |
|
84 |
os.chdir('branch2') |
|
2530.3.1
by Martin Pool
Cleanup old variations on run_bzr in the test suite |
85 |
self.run_bzr('merge ../branch1/baz', retcode=3) |
86 |
self.run_bzr('merge ../branch1/foo') |
|
1645.1.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement single-file merge |
87 |
self.failUnlessExists('foo') |
88 |
self.failIfExists('bar') |
|
1908.6.11
by Robert Collins
Remove usage of tree.pending_merges(). |
89 |
wt2 = WorkingTree.open('.') # opens branch2 |
90 |
self.assertEqual([tip], wt2.get_parent_ids()) |
|
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
91 |
|
974.1.88
by Aaron Bentley
Set a pending_merge if the merge base is forced to revno 0 |
92 |
def test_pending_with_null(self): |
1551.8.25
by Aaron Bentley
Fix deprecated use of pending_merges |
93 |
"""When base is forced to revno 0, parent_ids are set"""
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
94 |
wt2 = self.test_unrelated() |
1508.1.19
by Robert Collins
Give format3 working trees their own last-revision marker. |
95 |
wt1 = WorkingTree.open('.') |
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
96 |
br1 = wt1.branch |
1534.1.31
by Robert Collins
Deprecated fetch.fetch and fetch.greedy_fetch for branch.fetch, and move the Repository.fetch internals to InterRepo and InterWeaveRepo. |
97 |
br1.fetch(wt2.branch) |
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
98 |
# merge all of branch 2 into branch 1 even though they
|
1390
by Robert Collins
pair programming worx... merge integration and weave |
99 |
# are not related.
|
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
100 |
wt1.merge_from_branch(wt2.branch, wt2.last_revision(), 'null:') |
1908.6.11
by Robert Collins
Remove usage of tree.pending_merges(). |
101 |
self.assertEqual([br1.last_revision(), wt2.branch.last_revision()], |
102 |
wt1.get_parent_ids()) |
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
103 |
return (wt1, wt2.branch) |
974.1.89
by Aaron Bentley
Fixed merging with multiple roots, by using null as graph root. |
104 |
|
105 |
def test_two_roots(self): |
|
106 |
"""Merge base is sane when two unrelated branches are merged"""
|
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
107 |
wt1, br2 = self.test_pending_with_null() |
108 |
wt1.commit("blah") |
|
3228.4.15
by John Arbash Meinel
Stop using common_ancestor |
109 |
wt1.lock_read() |
110 |
try: |
|
111 |
last = wt1.branch.last_revision() |
|
112 |
last2 = br2.last_revision() |
|
113 |
graph = wt1.branch.repository.get_graph() |
|
114 |
self.assertEqual(last2, graph.find_unique_lca(last, last2)) |
|
115 |
finally: |
|
116 |
wt1.unlock() |
|
1185.46.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test case when file to be renamed is also deleted |
117 |
|
118 |
def test_create_rename(self): |
|
119 |
"""Rename an inventory entry while creating the file"""
|
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
120 |
tree =self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
1185.46.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test case when file to be renamed is also deleted |
121 |
file('name1', 'wb').write('Hello') |
122 |
tree.add('name1') |
|
123 |
tree.commit(message="hello") |
|
124 |
tree.rename_one('name1', 'name2') |
|
125 |
os.unlink('name2') |
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
126 |
transform_tree(tree, tree.branch.basis_tree()) |
1185.46.2
by Aaron Bentley
Added test for renaming both parent and child |
127 |
|
128 |
def test_layered_rename(self): |
|
129 |
"""Rename both child and parent at same time"""
|
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
130 |
tree =self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
1185.46.2
by Aaron Bentley
Added test for renaming both parent and child |
131 |
os.mkdir('dirname1') |
132 |
tree.add('dirname1') |
|
1185.31.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Updated the bzr sourcecode to use bzrlib.osutils.pathjoin rather than os.path.join to enforce internal use of / instead of \ |
133 |
filename = pathjoin('dirname1', 'name1') |
1185.46.2
by Aaron Bentley
Added test for renaming both parent and child |
134 |
file(filename, 'wb').write('Hello') |
135 |
tree.add(filename) |
|
136 |
tree.commit(message="hello") |
|
1185.31.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Updated the bzr sourcecode to use bzrlib.osutils.pathjoin rather than os.path.join to enforce internal use of / instead of \ |
137 |
filename2 = pathjoin('dirname1', 'name2') |
1185.46.2
by Aaron Bentley
Added test for renaming both parent and child |
138 |
tree.rename_one(filename, filename2) |
139 |
tree.rename_one('dirname1', 'dirname2') |
|
1534.4.26
by Robert Collins
Move working tree initialisation out from Branch.initialize, deprecated Branch.initialize to Branch.create. |
140 |
transform_tree(tree, tree.branch.basis_tree()) |
1551.2.23
by Aaron Bentley
Got merge_inner's ignore_zero parameter working |
141 |
|
142 |
def test_ignore_zero_merge_inner(self): |
|
1907.4.1
by Matthieu Moy
Fixed merge to work nicely with -r revno:N:path |
143 |
# Test that merge_inner's ignore zero parameter is effective
|
1551.2.23
by Aaron Bentley
Got merge_inner's ignore_zero parameter working |
144 |
tree_a =self.make_branch_and_tree('a') |
145 |
tree_a.commit(message="hello") |
|
146 |
dir_b = tree_a.bzrdir.sprout('b') |
|
147 |
tree_b = dir_b.open_workingtree() |
|
3146.4.4
by Aaron Bentley
Add write lock, so merge_inner works properly |
148 |
tree_b.lock_write() |
149 |
self.addCleanup(tree_b.unlock) |
|
1551.2.23
by Aaron Bentley
Got merge_inner's ignore_zero parameter working |
150 |
tree_a.commit(message="hello again") |
151 |
log = StringIO() |
|
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
152 |
merge_inner(tree_b.branch, tree_a, tree_b.basis_tree(), |
1551.2.23
by Aaron Bentley
Got merge_inner's ignore_zero parameter working |
153 |
this_tree=tree_b, ignore_zero=True) |
1927.3.1
by Carl Friedrich Bolz
Throw away on-disk logfile when possible. |
154 |
log = self._get_log(keep_log_file=True) |
1551.4.1
by Aaron Bentley
Workaround for silly _get_log behaviour in test |
155 |
self.failUnless('All changes applied successfully.\n' not in log) |
2796.1.3
by Aaron Bentley
update new test case |
156 |
tree_b.revert() |
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
157 |
merge_inner(tree_b.branch, tree_a, tree_b.basis_tree(), |
1551.2.23
by Aaron Bentley
Got merge_inner's ignore_zero parameter working |
158 |
this_tree=tree_b, ignore_zero=False) |
1927.3.1
by Carl Friedrich Bolz
Throw away on-disk logfile when possible. |
159 |
log = self._get_log(keep_log_file=True) |
1551.4.1
by Aaron Bentley
Workaround for silly _get_log behaviour in test |
160 |
self.failUnless('All changes applied successfully.\n' in log) |
1551.7.10
by Aaron Bentley
Remerge doesn't clear unrelated conflicts |
161 |
|
162 |
def test_merge_inner_conflicts(self): |
|
163 |
tree_a = self.make_branch_and_tree('a') |
|
164 |
tree_a.set_conflicts(ConflictList([TextConflict('patha')])) |
|
1551.7.11
by Aaron Bentley
Add WorkingTree.add_conflicts |
165 |
merge_inner(tree_a.branch, tree_a, tree_a, this_tree=tree_a) |
1551.7.13
by Aaron Bentley
Switched from actual, expected to expected, actual, for John. |
166 |
self.assertEqual(1, len(tree_a.conflicts())) |
1551.8.22
by Aaron Bentley
Improve message when OTHER deletes an in-use tree |
167 |
|
168 |
def test_rmdir_conflict(self): |
|
169 |
tree_a = self.make_branch_and_tree('a') |
|
170 |
self.build_tree(['a/b/']) |
|
171 |
tree_a.add('b', 'b-id') |
|
172 |
tree_a.commit('added b') |
|
2255.7.12
by John Arbash Meinel
Some comments on merge code, fix merge tests that |
173 |
# basis_tree() is only guaranteed to be valid as long as it is actually
|
174 |
# the basis tree. This mutates the tree after grabbing basis, so go to
|
|
175 |
# the repository.
|
|
176 |
base_tree = tree_a.branch.repository.revision_tree(tree_a.last_revision()) |
|
1551.8.22
by Aaron Bentley
Improve message when OTHER deletes an in-use tree |
177 |
tree_z = tree_a.bzrdir.sprout('z').open_workingtree() |
178 |
self.build_tree(['a/b/c']) |
|
179 |
tree_a.add('b/c') |
|
180 |
tree_a.commit('added c') |
|
181 |
os.rmdir('z/b') |
|
182 |
tree_z.commit('removed b') |
|
183 |
merge_inner(tree_z.branch, tree_a, base_tree, this_tree=tree_z) |
|
184 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
185 |
conflicts.MissingParent('Created directory', 'b', 'b-id'), |
|
186 |
conflicts.UnversionedParent('Versioned directory', 'b', 'b-id')], |
|
187 |
tree_z.conflicts()) |
|
2255.2.216
by Robert Collins
simplify merge_nested tests. |
188 |
merge_inner(tree_a.branch, tree_z.basis_tree(), base_tree, |
1551.8.22
by Aaron Bentley
Improve message when OTHER deletes an in-use tree |
189 |
this_tree=tree_a) |
190 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
191 |
conflicts.DeletingParent('Not deleting', 'b', 'b-id'), |
|
192 |
conflicts.UnversionedParent('Versioned directory', 'b', 'b-id')], |
|
193 |
tree_a.conflicts()) |
|
1551.10.2
by Aaron Bentley
Handle merge with dangling inventory entries |
194 |
|
2100.3.29
by Aaron Bentley
Get merge working initially |
195 |
def test_nested_merge(self): |
2255.2.194
by Robert Collins
[BROKEN] Many updates to stop using experimental formats in tests. |
196 |
tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree', |
197 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2100.3.29
by Aaron Bentley
Get merge working initially |
198 |
sub_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree/sub-tree', |
2255.2.194
by Robert Collins
[BROKEN] Many updates to stop using experimental formats in tests. |
199 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
2100.3.29
by Aaron Bentley
Get merge working initially |
200 |
sub_tree.set_root_id('sub-tree-root') |
201 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree/sub-tree/file', 'text1')]) |
|
202 |
sub_tree.add('file') |
|
203 |
sub_tree.commit('foo') |
|
204 |
tree.add_reference(sub_tree) |
|
205 |
tree.commit('set text to 1') |
|
206 |
tree2 = tree.bzrdir.sprout('tree2').open_workingtree() |
|
2255.2.217
by Martin Pool
docs |
207 |
# modify the file in the subtree
|
2100.3.29
by Aaron Bentley
Get merge working initially |
208 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree2/sub-tree/file', 'text2')]) |
2255.2.217
by Martin Pool
docs |
209 |
# and merge the changes from the diverged subtree into the containing
|
210 |
# tree
|
|
2255.2.216
by Robert Collins
simplify merge_nested tests. |
211 |
tree2.commit('changed file text') |
2100.3.29
by Aaron Bentley
Get merge working initially |
212 |
tree.merge_from_branch(tree2.branch) |
213 |
self.assertFileEqual('text2', 'tree/sub-tree/file') |
|
214 |
||
1551.10.2
by Aaron Bentley
Handle merge with dangling inventory entries |
215 |
def test_merge_with_missing(self): |
216 |
tree_a = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree_a') |
|
217 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree_a/file', 'content_1')]) |
|
218 |
tree_a.add('file') |
|
219 |
tree_a.commit('commit base') |
|
2255.7.12
by John Arbash Meinel
Some comments on merge code, fix merge tests that |
220 |
# basis_tree() is only guaranteed to be valid as long as it is actually
|
221 |
# the basis tree. This mutates the tree after grabbing basis, so go to
|
|
222 |
# the repository.
|
|
223 |
base_tree = tree_a.branch.repository.revision_tree(tree_a.last_revision()) |
|
1551.10.2
by Aaron Bentley
Handle merge with dangling inventory entries |
224 |
tree_b = tree_a.bzrdir.sprout('tree_b').open_workingtree() |
225 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree_a/file', 'content_2')]) |
|
226 |
tree_a.commit('commit other') |
|
227 |
other_tree = tree_a.basis_tree() |
|
228 |
os.unlink('tree_b/file') |
|
229 |
merge_inner(tree_b.branch, other_tree, base_tree, this_tree=tree_b) |
|
1959.4.6
by Aaron Bentley
Ensure merge works across kind changes |
230 |
|
231 |
def test_merge_kind_change(self): |
|
232 |
tree_a = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree_a') |
|
233 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree_a/file', 'content_1')]) |
|
234 |
tree_a.add('file', 'file-id') |
|
235 |
tree_a.commit('added file') |
|
236 |
tree_b = tree_a.bzrdir.sprout('tree_b').open_workingtree() |
|
237 |
os.unlink('tree_a/file') |
|
238 |
self.build_tree(['tree_a/file/']) |
|
239 |
tree_a.commit('changed file to directory') |
|
240 |
tree_b.merge_from_branch(tree_a.branch) |
|
241 |
self.assertEqual('directory', file_kind('tree_b/file')) |
|
2748.3.2
by Aaron Bentley
Fix revert, remove-tree, and various tests to use None for 'no files specified' |
242 |
tree_b.revert() |
1959.4.6
by Aaron Bentley
Ensure merge works across kind changes |
243 |
self.assertEqual('file', file_kind('tree_b/file')) |
244 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree_b/file', 'content_2')]) |
|
245 |
tree_b.commit('content change') |
|
246 |
tree_b.merge_from_branch(tree_a.branch) |
|
247 |
self.assertEqual(tree_b.conflicts(), |
|
248 |
[conflicts.ContentsConflict('file', |
|
249 |
file_id='file-id')]) |
|
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
250 |
|
2221.4.16
by Aaron Bentley
Add tests for get_merge_type_registry |
251 |
def test_merge_type_registry(self): |
252 |
merge_type_option = option.Option.OPTIONS['merge-type'] |
|
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
253 |
self.assertFalse('merge4' in [x[0] for x in |
2221.4.16
by Aaron Bentley
Add tests for get_merge_type_registry |
254 |
merge_type_option.iter_switches()]) |
255 |
registry = _mod_merge.get_merge_type_registry() |
|
256 |
registry.register_lazy('merge4', 'bzrlib.merge', 'Merge4Merger', |
|
257 |
'time-travelling merge') |
|
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
258 |
self.assertTrue('merge4' in [x[0] for x in |
2221.4.16
by Aaron Bentley
Add tests for get_merge_type_registry |
259 |
merge_type_option.iter_switches()]) |
260 |
registry.remove('merge4') |
|
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
261 |
self.assertFalse('merge4' in [x[0] for x in |
2221.4.16
by Aaron Bentley
Add tests for get_merge_type_registry |
262 |
merge_type_option.iter_switches()]) |
1551.16.2
by Aaron Bentley
Don't crash on merging renamed deleted files (#110279) |
263 |
|
1551.16.3
by Aaron Bentley
Rename test case |
264 |
def test_merge_other_moves_we_deleted(self): |
1551.16.2
by Aaron Bentley
Don't crash on merging renamed deleted files (#110279) |
265 |
tree_a = self.make_branch_and_tree('A') |
266 |
tree_a.lock_write() |
|
267 |
self.addCleanup(tree_a.unlock) |
|
268 |
self.build_tree(['A/a']) |
|
269 |
tree_a.add('a') |
|
270 |
tree_a.commit('1', rev_id='rev-1') |
|
271 |
tree_a.flush() |
|
272 |
tree_a.rename_one('a', 'b') |
|
273 |
tree_a.commit('2') |
|
274 |
bzrdir_b = tree_a.bzrdir.sprout('B', revision_id='rev-1') |
|
275 |
tree_b = bzrdir_b.open_workingtree() |
|
276 |
tree_b.lock_write() |
|
277 |
self.addCleanup(tree_b.unlock) |
|
278 |
os.unlink('B/a') |
|
279 |
tree_b.commit('3') |
|
280 |
try: |
|
281 |
tree_b.merge_from_branch(tree_a.branch) |
|
282 |
except AttributeError: |
|
283 |
self.fail('tried to join a path when name was None') |
|
2644.1.1
by Wouter van Heyst
Fix bug #127115 by checking for self.other_rev_id being None in Merger.set_pending() |
284 |
|
2644.1.2
by Wouter van Heyst
As Aaron explained #127115 is more general, failing whenever other's basis is an ancestor of this' basis. |
285 |
def test_merge_uncommitted_otherbasis_ancestor_of_thisbasis(self): |
2644.1.1
by Wouter van Heyst
Fix bug #127115 by checking for self.other_rev_id being None in Merger.set_pending() |
286 |
tree_a = self.make_branch_and_tree('a') |
2644.1.2
by Wouter van Heyst
As Aaron explained #127115 is more general, failing whenever other's basis is an ancestor of this' basis. |
287 |
self.build_tree(['a/file_1', 'a/file_2']) |
2644.1.1
by Wouter van Heyst
Fix bug #127115 by checking for self.other_rev_id being None in Merger.set_pending() |
288 |
tree_a.add(['file_1']) |
289 |
tree_a.commit('commit 1') |
|
2644.1.2
by Wouter van Heyst
As Aaron explained #127115 is more general, failing whenever other's basis is an ancestor of this' basis. |
290 |
tree_a.add(['file_2']) |
291 |
tree_a.commit('commit 2') |
|
2644.1.1
by Wouter van Heyst
Fix bug #127115 by checking for self.other_rev_id being None in Merger.set_pending() |
292 |
tree_b = tree_a.bzrdir.sprout('b').open_workingtree() |
2644.1.2
by Wouter van Heyst
As Aaron explained #127115 is more general, failing whenever other's basis is an ancestor of this' basis. |
293 |
tree_b.rename_one('file_1', 'renamed') |
1551.15.72
by Aaron Bentley
remove builtins._merge_helper |
294 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_uncommitted(tree_a, tree_b, |
295 |
progress.DummyProgress()) |
|
296 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
297 |
merger.do_merge() |
|
2644.1.2
by Wouter van Heyst
As Aaron explained #127115 is more general, failing whenever other's basis is an ancestor of this' basis. |
298 |
self.assertEqual(tree_a.get_parent_ids(), [tree_b.last_revision()]) |
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
299 |
|
3146.5.1
by Aaron Bentley
Make merge --uncommitted work with merge-type weave |
300 |
def test_merge_uncommitted_otherbasis_ancestor_of_thisbasis_weave(self): |
301 |
tree_a = self.make_branch_and_tree('a') |
|
302 |
self.build_tree(['a/file_1', 'a/file_2']) |
|
303 |
tree_a.add(['file_1']) |
|
304 |
tree_a.commit('commit 1') |
|
305 |
tree_a.add(['file_2']) |
|
306 |
tree_a.commit('commit 2') |
|
307 |
tree_b = tree_a.bzrdir.sprout('b').open_workingtree() |
|
308 |
tree_b.rename_one('file_1', 'renamed') |
|
309 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_uncommitted(tree_a, tree_b, |
|
310 |
progress.DummyProgress()) |
|
311 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.WeaveMerger |
|
312 |
merger.do_merge() |
|
313 |
self.assertEqual(tree_a.get_parent_ids(), [tree_b.last_revision()]) |
|
314 |
||
1551.21.7
by Aaron Bentley
Fix progress warning |
315 |
def test_Merger_defaults_to_DummyProgress(self): |
316 |
branch = self.make_branch('branch') |
|
317 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger(branch, pb=None) |
|
318 |
self.assertIsInstance(merger._pb, progress.DummyProgress) |
|
319 |
||
3062.2.7
by Aaron Bentley
Prevent reverse cherry-picking with weave |
320 |
def prepare_cherrypick(self): |
3062.2.13
by Aaron Bentley
Update prepare_cherrypick docstring |
321 |
"""Prepare a pair of trees for cherrypicking tests.
|
322 |
||
323 |
Both trees have a file, 'file'.
|
|
324 |
rev1 sets content to 'a'.
|
|
325 |
rev2b adds 'b'.
|
|
326 |
rev3b adds 'c'.
|
|
327 |
A full merge of rev2b and rev3b into this_tree would add both 'b' and
|
|
328 |
'c'. A successful cherrypick of rev2b-rev3b into this_tree will add
|
|
329 |
'c', but not 'b'.
|
|
330 |
"""
|
|
3062.2.6
by Aaron Bentley
Get cherrypick-on-weave working |
331 |
this_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('this') |
332 |
self.build_tree_contents([('this/file', "a\n")]) |
|
333 |
this_tree.add('file') |
|
334 |
this_tree.commit('rev1') |
|
335 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other').open_workingtree() |
|
336 |
self.build_tree_contents([('other/file', "a\nb\n")]) |
|
337 |
other_tree.commit('rev2b', rev_id='rev2b') |
|
338 |
self.build_tree_contents([('other/file', "c\na\nb\n")]) |
|
339 |
other_tree.commit('rev3b', rev_id='rev3b') |
|
340 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
341 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
3062.2.7
by Aaron Bentley
Prevent reverse cherry-picking with weave |
342 |
return this_tree, other_tree |
343 |
||
344 |
def test_weave_cherrypick(self): |
|
345 |
this_tree, other_tree = self.prepare_cherrypick() |
|
3062.2.6
by Aaron Bentley
Get cherrypick-on-weave working |
346 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
347 |
this_tree, 'rev3b', 'rev2b', other_tree.branch) |
|
348 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.WeaveMerger |
|
349 |
merger.do_merge() |
|
350 |
self.assertFileEqual('c\na\n', 'this/file') |
|
351 |
||
3062.2.7
by Aaron Bentley
Prevent reverse cherry-picking with weave |
352 |
def test_weave_cannot_reverse_cherrypick(self): |
353 |
this_tree, other_tree = self.prepare_cherrypick() |
|
354 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
355 |
this_tree, 'rev2b', 'rev3b', other_tree.branch) |
|
356 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.WeaveMerger |
|
357 |
self.assertRaises(errors.CannotReverseCherrypick, merger.do_merge) |
|
358 |
||
359 |
def test_merge3_can_reverse_cherrypick(self): |
|
360 |
this_tree, other_tree = self.prepare_cherrypick() |
|
361 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
362 |
this_tree, 'rev2b', 'rev3b', other_tree.branch) |
|
363 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
364 |
merger.do_merge() |
|
365 |
||
3249.3.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Implement cherrypick support for Merge3 |
366 |
def test_merge3_will_detect_cherrypick(self): |
367 |
this_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('this') |
|
368 |
self.build_tree_contents([('this/file', "a\n")]) |
|
369 |
this_tree.add('file') |
|
370 |
this_tree.commit('rev1') |
|
371 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other').open_workingtree() |
|
372 |
self.build_tree_contents([('other/file', "a\nb\n")]) |
|
373 |
other_tree.commit('rev2b', rev_id='rev2b') |
|
374 |
self.build_tree_contents([('other/file', "a\nb\nc\n")]) |
|
375 |
other_tree.commit('rev3b', rev_id='rev3b') |
|
376 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
377 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
378 |
||
379 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
380 |
this_tree, 'rev3b', 'rev2b', other_tree.branch) |
|
381 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
382 |
merger.do_merge() |
|
383 |
self.assertFileEqual('a\n' |
|
384 |
'<<<<<<< TREE\n' |
|
385 |
'=======\n' |
|
386 |
'c\n' |
|
387 |
'>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE\n', |
|
388 |
'this/file') |
|
389 |
||
3008.1.21
by Aaron Bentley
Make compute_transform private, test make_preview_transform |
390 |
def test_make_merger(self): |
391 |
this_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('this') |
|
392 |
this_tree.commit('rev1', rev_id='rev1') |
|
393 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other').open_workingtree() |
|
394 |
this_tree.commit('rev2', rev_id='rev2a') |
|
395 |
other_tree.commit('rev2', rev_id='rev2b') |
|
396 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
397 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
398 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress, |
|
399 |
this_tree, 'rev2b', other_branch=other_tree.branch) |
|
400 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
401 |
tree_merger = merger.make_merger() |
|
402 |
self.assertIs(_mod_merge.Merge3Merger, tree_merger.__class__) |
|
403 |
self.assertEqual('rev2b', tree_merger.other_tree.get_revision_id()) |
|
404 |
self.assertEqual('rev1', tree_merger.base_tree.get_revision_id()) |
|
405 |
||
406 |
def test_make_preview_transform(self): |
|
407 |
this_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('this') |
|
408 |
self.build_tree_contents([('this/file', '1\n')]) |
|
409 |
this_tree.add('file', 'file-id') |
|
410 |
this_tree.commit('rev1', rev_id='rev1') |
|
411 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other').open_workingtree() |
|
412 |
self.build_tree_contents([('this/file', '1\n2a\n')]) |
|
413 |
this_tree.commit('rev2', rev_id='rev2a') |
|
414 |
self.build_tree_contents([('other/file', '2b\n1\n')]) |
|
415 |
other_tree.commit('rev2', rev_id='rev2b') |
|
416 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
417 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
418 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
419 |
this_tree, 'rev2b', other_branch=other_tree.branch) |
|
420 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
421 |
tree_merger = merger.make_merger() |
|
422 |
tt = tree_merger.make_preview_transform() |
|
3199.1.5
by Vincent Ladeuil
Fix two more leaking tmp dirs, by reworking TransformPreview lock handling. |
423 |
self.addCleanup(tt.finalize) |
3008.1.21
by Aaron Bentley
Make compute_transform private, test make_preview_transform |
424 |
preview_tree = tt.get_preview_tree() |
425 |
tree_file = this_tree.get_file('file-id') |
|
426 |
try: |
|
427 |
self.assertEqual('1\n2a\n', tree_file.read()) |
|
428 |
finally: |
|
429 |
tree_file.close() |
|
430 |
preview_file = preview_tree.get_file('file-id') |
|
431 |
try: |
|
432 |
self.assertEqual('2b\n1\n2a\n', preview_file.read()) |
|
433 |
finally: |
|
434 |
preview_file.close() |
|
435 |
||
3008.1.22
by Aaron Bentley
Get do_merge under test |
436 |
def test_do_merge(self): |
437 |
this_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('this') |
|
438 |
self.build_tree_contents([('this/file', '1\n')]) |
|
439 |
this_tree.add('file', 'file-id') |
|
440 |
this_tree.commit('rev1', rev_id='rev1') |
|
441 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other').open_workingtree() |
|
442 |
self.build_tree_contents([('this/file', '1\n2a\n')]) |
|
443 |
this_tree.commit('rev2', rev_id='rev2a') |
|
444 |
self.build_tree_contents([('other/file', '2b\n1\n')]) |
|
445 |
other_tree.commit('rev2', rev_id='rev2b') |
|
446 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
447 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
448 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
449 |
this_tree, 'rev2b', other_branch=other_tree.branch) |
|
450 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
451 |
tree_merger = merger.make_merger() |
|
452 |
tt = tree_merger.do_merge() |
|
453 |
tree_file = this_tree.get_file('file-id') |
|
454 |
try: |
|
455 |
self.assertEqual('2b\n1\n2a\n', tree_file.read()) |
|
456 |
finally: |
|
457 |
tree_file.close() |
|
458 |
||
1551.19.32
by Aaron Bentley
Don't traceback when adding files to a deleted root (abentley, #210092) |
459 |
def test_merge_add_into_deleted_root(self): |
460 |
# Yes, people actually do this. And report bugs if it breaks.
|
|
461 |
source = self.make_branch_and_tree('source', format='rich-root-pack') |
|
462 |
self.build_tree(['source/foo/']) |
|
463 |
source.add('foo', 'foo-id') |
|
464 |
source.commit('Add foo') |
|
465 |
target = source.bzrdir.sprout('target').open_workingtree() |
|
466 |
subtree = target.extract('foo-id') |
|
467 |
subtree.commit('Delete root') |
|
468 |
self.build_tree(['source/bar']) |
|
469 |
source.add('bar', 'bar-id') |
|
470 |
source.commit('Add bar') |
|
471 |
subtree.merge_from_branch(source.branch) |
|
472 |
||
3649.3.1
by Jelmer Vernooij
Merging from a previously joined branch will no longer cause a traceback. |
473 |
def test_merge_joined_branch(self): |
474 |
source = self.make_branch_and_tree('source', format='rich-root-pack') |
|
475 |
self.build_tree(['source/foo']) |
|
476 |
source.add('foo') |
|
477 |
source.commit('Add foo') |
|
478 |
target = self.make_branch_and_tree('target', format='rich-root-pack') |
|
479 |
self.build_tree(['target/bla']) |
|
480 |
target.add('bla') |
|
481 |
target.commit('Add bla') |
|
482 |
nested = source.bzrdir.sprout('target/subtree').open_workingtree() |
|
483 |
target.subsume(nested) |
|
484 |
target.commit('Join nested') |
|
485 |
self.build_tree(['source/bar']) |
|
486 |
source.add('bar') |
|
487 |
source.commit('Add bar') |
|
488 |
target.merge_from_branch(source.branch) |
|
489 |
target.commit('Merge source') |
|
490 |
||
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
491 |
|
492 |
class TestPlanMerge(TestCaseWithMemoryTransport): |
|
493 |
||
494 |
def setUp(self): |
|
495 |
TestCaseWithMemoryTransport.setUp(self) |
|
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
496 |
mapper = versionedfile.PrefixMapper() |
497 |
factory = knit.make_file_factory(True, mapper) |
|
498 |
self.vf = factory(self.get_transport()) |
|
499 |
self.plan_merge_vf = versionedfile._PlanMergeVersionedFile('root') |
|
500 |
self.plan_merge_vf.fallback_versionedfiles.append(self.vf) |
|
501 |
||
502 |
def add_version(self, key, parents, text): |
|
503 |
self.vf.add_lines(key, parents, [c+'\n' for c in text]) |
|
504 |
||
3514.2.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle more edge cases. |
505 |
def add_rev(self, prefix, revision_id, parents, text): |
506 |
self.add_version((prefix, revision_id), [(prefix, p) for p in parents], |
|
507 |
text) |
|
508 |
||
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
509 |
def add_uncommitted_version(self, key, parents, text): |
510 |
self.plan_merge_vf.add_lines(key, parents, |
|
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
511 |
[c+'\n' for c in text]) |
512 |
||
513 |
def setup_plan_merge(self): |
|
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
514 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', [], 'abc') |
515 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['A'], 'acehg') |
|
516 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', ['A'], 'fabg') |
|
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
517 |
return _PlanMerge('B', 'C', self.plan_merge_vf, ('root',)) |
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
518 |
|
519 |
def setup_plan_merge_uncommitted(self): |
|
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
520 |
self.add_version(('root', 'A'), [], 'abc') |
521 |
self.add_uncommitted_version(('root', 'B:'), [('root', 'A')], 'acehg') |
|
522 |
self.add_uncommitted_version(('root', 'C:'), [('root', 'A')], 'fabg') |
|
523 |
return _PlanMerge('B:', 'C:', self.plan_merge_vf, ('root',)) |
|
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
524 |
|
525 |
def test_unique_lines(self): |
|
526 |
plan = self.setup_plan_merge() |
|
527 |
self.assertEqual(plan._unique_lines( |
|
528 |
plan._get_matching_blocks('B', 'C')), |
|
529 |
([1, 2, 3], [0, 2])) |
|
530 |
||
3514.2.6
by John Arbash Meinel
Write a (failing) test for complex ancestry. |
531 |
def test_plan_merge(self): |
532 |
self.setup_plan_merge() |
|
533 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('B', 'C') |
|
534 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
535 |
('new-b', 'f\n'), |
|
536 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
537 |
('killed-a', 'b\n'), |
|
538 |
('killed-b', 'c\n'), |
|
539 |
('new-a', 'e\n'), |
|
540 |
('new-a', 'h\n'), |
|
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
541 |
('new-a', 'g\n'), |
542 |
('new-b', 'g\n')], |
|
3514.2.6
by John Arbash Meinel
Write a (failing) test for complex ancestry. |
543 |
list(plan)) |
544 |
||
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
545 |
def test_plan_merge_cherrypick(self): |
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
546 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', [], 'abc') |
547 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['A'], 'abcde') |
|
548 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', ['A'], 'abcefg') |
|
549 |
self.add_rev('root', 'D', ['A', 'B', 'C'], 'abcdegh') |
|
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
550 |
my_plan = _PlanMerge('B', 'D', self.plan_merge_vf, ('root',)) |
3514.2.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Shortcut the case when one revision is in the ancestry of the other. |
551 |
# We shortcut when one text supersedes the other in the per-file graph.
|
552 |
# We don't actually need to compare the texts at this point.
|
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
553 |
self.assertEqual([ |
3514.2.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Shortcut the case when one revision is in the ancestry of the other. |
554 |
('new-b', 'a\n'), |
555 |
('new-b', 'b\n'), |
|
556 |
('new-b', 'c\n'), |
|
557 |
('new-b', 'd\n'), |
|
558 |
('new-b', 'e\n'), |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
559 |
('new-b', 'g\n'), |
560 |
('new-b', 'h\n')], |
|
561 |
list(my_plan.plan_merge())) |
|
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
562 |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
563 |
def test_plan_merge_no_common_ancestor(self): |
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
564 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', [], 'abc') |
565 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', [], 'xyz') |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
566 |
my_plan = _PlanMerge('A', 'B', self.plan_merge_vf, ('root',)) |
567 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
568 |
('new-a', 'a\n'), |
569 |
('new-a', 'b\n'), |
|
570 |
('new-a', 'c\n'), |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
571 |
('new-b', 'x\n'), |
572 |
('new-b', 'y\n'), |
|
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
573 |
('new-b', 'z\n')], |
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
574 |
list(my_plan.plan_merge())) |
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
575 |
|
3514.2.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle more edge cases. |
576 |
def test_plan_merge_tail_ancestors(self): |
577 |
# The graph looks like this:
|
|
578 |
# A # Common to all ancestors
|
|
579 |
# / \
|
|
580 |
# B C # Ancestors of E, only common to one side
|
|
581 |
# |\ /|
|
|
582 |
# D E F # D, F are unique to G, H respectively
|
|
583 |
# |/ \| # E is the LCA for G & H, and the unique LCA for
|
|
584 |
# G H # I, J
|
|
585 |
# |\ /|
|
|
586 |
# | X |
|
|
587 |
# |/ \|
|
|
588 |
# I J # criss-cross merge of G, H
|
|
589 |
#
|
|
590 |
# In this situation, a simple pruning of ancestors of E will leave D &
|
|
591 |
# F "dangling", which looks like they introduce lines different from
|
|
592 |
# the ones in E, but in actuality C&B introduced the lines, and they
|
|
593 |
# are already present in E
|
|
594 |
||
595 |
# Introduce the base text
|
|
596 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', [], 'abc') |
|
597 |
# Introduces a new line B
|
|
598 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['A'], 'aBbc') |
|
599 |
# Introduces a new line C
|
|
600 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', ['A'], 'abCc') |
|
601 |
# Introduce new line D
|
|
602 |
self.add_rev('root', 'D', ['B'], 'DaBbc') |
|
603 |
# Merges B and C by just incorporating both
|
|
604 |
self.add_rev('root', 'E', ['B', 'C'], 'aBbCc') |
|
605 |
# Introduce new line F
|
|
606 |
self.add_rev('root', 'F', ['C'], 'abCcF') |
|
607 |
# Merge D & E by just combining the texts
|
|
608 |
self.add_rev('root', 'G', ['D', 'E'], 'DaBbCc') |
|
609 |
# Merge F & E by just combining the texts
|
|
610 |
self.add_rev('root', 'H', ['F', 'E'], 'aBbCcF') |
|
611 |
# Merge G & H by just combining texts
|
|
612 |
self.add_rev('root', 'I', ['G', 'H'], 'DaBbCcF') |
|
613 |
# Merge G & H but supersede an old line in B
|
|
614 |
self.add_rev('root', 'J', ['H', 'G'], 'DaJbCcF') |
|
615 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('I', 'J') |
|
616 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
617 |
('unchanged', 'D\n'), |
|
618 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
619 |
('killed-b', 'B\n'), |
|
620 |
('new-b', 'J\n'), |
|
621 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
622 |
('unchanged', 'C\n'), |
|
623 |
('unchanged', 'c\n'), |
|
624 |
('unchanged', 'F\n')], |
|
625 |
list(plan)) |
|
626 |
||
627 |
def test_plan_merge_tail_triple_ancestors(self): |
|
628 |
# The graph looks like this:
|
|
629 |
# A # Common to all ancestors
|
|
630 |
# / \
|
|
631 |
# B C # Ancestors of E, only common to one side
|
|
632 |
# |\ /|
|
|
633 |
# D E F # D, F are unique to G, H respectively
|
|
634 |
# |/|\| # E is the LCA for G & H, and the unique LCA for
|
|
635 |
# G Q H # I, J
|
|
636 |
# |\ /| # Q is just an extra node which is merged into both
|
|
637 |
# | X | # I and J
|
|
638 |
# |/ \|
|
|
639 |
# I J # criss-cross merge of G, H
|
|
640 |
#
|
|
641 |
# This is the same as the test_plan_merge_tail_ancestors, except we add
|
|
642 |
# a third LCA that doesn't add new lines, but will trigger our more
|
|
643 |
# involved ancestry logic
|
|
644 |
||
645 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', [], 'abc') |
|
646 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['A'], 'aBbc') |
|
647 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', ['A'], 'abCc') |
|
648 |
self.add_rev('root', 'D', ['B'], 'DaBbc') |
|
649 |
self.add_rev('root', 'E', ['B', 'C'], 'aBbCc') |
|
650 |
self.add_rev('root', 'F', ['C'], 'abCcF') |
|
651 |
self.add_rev('root', 'G', ['D', 'E'], 'DaBbCc') |
|
652 |
self.add_rev('root', 'H', ['F', 'E'], 'aBbCcF') |
|
653 |
self.add_rev('root', 'Q', ['E'], 'aBbCc') |
|
654 |
self.add_rev('root', 'I', ['G', 'Q', 'H'], 'DaBbCcF') |
|
655 |
# Merge G & H but supersede an old line in B
|
|
656 |
self.add_rev('root', 'J', ['H', 'Q', 'G'], 'DaJbCcF') |
|
657 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('I', 'J') |
|
658 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
659 |
('unchanged', 'D\n'), |
|
660 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
661 |
('killed-b', 'B\n'), |
|
662 |
('new-b', 'J\n'), |
|
663 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
664 |
('unchanged', 'C\n'), |
|
665 |
('unchanged', 'c\n'), |
|
666 |
('unchanged', 'F\n')], |
|
667 |
list(plan)) |
|
668 |
||
3514.2.14
by John Arbash Meinel
Bring in the code to collapse linear portions of the graph. |
669 |
def test_plan_merge_2_tail_triple_ancestors(self): |
670 |
# The graph looks like this:
|
|
671 |
# A B # 2 tails going back to NULL
|
|
672 |
# |\ /|
|
|
673 |
# D E F # D, is unique to G, F to H
|
|
674 |
# |/|\| # E is the LCA for G & H, and the unique LCA for
|
|
675 |
# G Q H # I, J
|
|
676 |
# |\ /| # Q is just an extra node which is merged into both
|
|
677 |
# | X | # I and J
|
|
678 |
# |/ \|
|
|
679 |
# I J # criss-cross merge of G, H (and Q)
|
|
680 |
#
|
|
681 |
||
682 |
# This is meant to test after hitting a 3-way LCA, and multiple tail
|
|
683 |
# ancestors (only have NULL_REVISION in common)
|
|
684 |
||
685 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', [], 'abc') |
|
686 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', [], 'def') |
|
687 |
self.add_rev('root', 'D', ['A'], 'Dabc') |
|
688 |
self.add_rev('root', 'E', ['A', 'B'], 'abcdef') |
|
689 |
self.add_rev('root', 'F', ['B'], 'defF') |
|
690 |
self.add_rev('root', 'G', ['D', 'E'], 'Dabcdef') |
|
691 |
self.add_rev('root', 'H', ['F', 'E'], 'abcdefF') |
|
692 |
self.add_rev('root', 'Q', ['E'], 'abcdef') |
|
693 |
self.add_rev('root', 'I', ['G', 'Q', 'H'], 'DabcdefF') |
|
694 |
# Merge G & H but supersede an old line in B
|
|
695 |
self.add_rev('root', 'J', ['H', 'Q', 'G'], 'DabcdJfF') |
|
696 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('I', 'J') |
|
697 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
698 |
('unchanged', 'D\n'), |
|
699 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
700 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
701 |
('unchanged', 'c\n'), |
|
702 |
('unchanged', 'd\n'), |
|
703 |
('killed-b', 'e\n'), |
|
704 |
('new-b', 'J\n'), |
|
705 |
('unchanged', 'f\n'), |
|
706 |
('unchanged', 'F\n')], |
|
707 |
list(plan)) |
|
708 |
||
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
709 |
def test_plan_merge_uncommitted_files(self): |
3062.1.13
by Aaron Bentley
Make _PlanMerge an implementation detail of _PlanMergeVersionedFile |
710 |
self.setup_plan_merge_uncommitted() |
711 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('B:', 'C:') |
|
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
712 |
self.assertEqual([ |
713 |
('new-b', 'f\n'), |
|
714 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
715 |
('killed-a', 'b\n'), |
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
716 |
('killed-b', 'c\n'), |
717 |
('new-a', 'e\n'), |
|
718 |
('new-a', 'h\n'), |
|
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
719 |
('new-a', 'g\n'), |
720 |
('new-b', 'g\n')], |
|
721 |
list(plan)) |
|
722 |
||
723 |
def test_plan_merge_insert_order(self): |
|
724 |
"""Weave merges are sensitive to the order of insertion.
|
|
3943.8.1
by Marius Kruger
remove all trailing whitespace from bzr source |
725 |
|
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
726 |
Specifically for overlapping regions, it effects which region gets put
|
727 |
'first'. And when a user resolves an overlapping merge, if they use the
|
|
728 |
same ordering, then the lines match the parents, if they don't only
|
|
729 |
*some* of the lines match.
|
|
730 |
"""
|
|
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
731 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', [], 'abcdef') |
732 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['A'], 'abwxcdef') |
|
733 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', ['A'], 'abyzcdef') |
|
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
734 |
# Merge, and resolve the conflict by adding *both* sets of lines
|
735 |
# If we get the ordering wrong, these will look like new lines in D,
|
|
736 |
# rather than carried over from B, C
|
|
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
737 |
self.add_rev('root', 'D', ['B', 'C'], |
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
738 |
'abwxyzcdef') |
739 |
# Supersede the lines in B and delete the lines in C, which will
|
|
740 |
# conflict if they are treated as being in D
|
|
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
741 |
self.add_rev('root', 'E', ['C', 'B'], |
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
742 |
'abnocdef') |
743 |
# Same thing for the lines in C
|
|
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
744 |
self.add_rev('root', 'F', ['C'], 'abpqcdef') |
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
745 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('D', 'E') |
746 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
747 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
748 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
749 |
('killed-b', 'w\n'), |
|
750 |
('killed-b', 'x\n'), |
|
751 |
('killed-b', 'y\n'), |
|
752 |
('killed-b', 'z\n'), |
|
753 |
('new-b', 'n\n'), |
|
754 |
('new-b', 'o\n'), |
|
755 |
('unchanged', 'c\n'), |
|
756 |
('unchanged', 'd\n'), |
|
757 |
('unchanged', 'e\n'), |
|
758 |
('unchanged', 'f\n')], |
|
759 |
list(plan)) |
|
760 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('E', 'D') |
|
761 |
# Going in the opposite direction shows the effect of the opposite plan
|
|
762 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
763 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
764 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
765 |
('new-b', 'w\n'), |
|
766 |
('new-b', 'x\n'), |
|
767 |
('killed-a', 'y\n'), |
|
768 |
('killed-a', 'z\n'), |
|
769 |
('killed-both', 'w\n'), |
|
770 |
('killed-both', 'x\n'), |
|
771 |
('new-a', 'n\n'), |
|
772 |
('new-a', 'o\n'), |
|
773 |
('unchanged', 'c\n'), |
|
774 |
('unchanged', 'd\n'), |
|
775 |
('unchanged', 'e\n'), |
|
776 |
('unchanged', 'f\n')], |
|
3062.1.9
by Aaron Bentley
Move PlanMerge into merge and _PlanMergeVersionedFile into versionedfile |
777 |
list(plan)) |
3062.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Add support for plan-merge with a base |
778 |
|
3514.2.6
by John Arbash Meinel
Write a (failing) test for complex ancestry. |
779 |
def test_plan_merge_criss_cross(self): |
780 |
# This is specificly trying to trigger problems when using limited
|
|
781 |
# ancestry and weaves. The ancestry graph looks like:
|
|
3514.2.8
by John Arbash Meinel
The insertion ordering into the weave has an impact on conflicts. |
782 |
# XX unused ancestor, should not show up in the weave
|
783 |
# |
|
|
3514.2.6
by John Arbash Meinel
Write a (failing) test for complex ancestry. |
784 |
# A Unique LCA
|
785 |
# |\
|
|
786 |
# B \ Introduces a line 'foo'
|
|
787 |
# / \ \
|
|
788 |
# C D E C & D both have 'foo', E has different changes
|
|
789 |
# |\ /| |
|
|
790 |
# | X | |
|
|
791 |
# |/ \|/
|
|
792 |
# F G All of C, D, E are merged into F and G, so they are
|
|
793 |
# all common ancestors.
|
|
794 |
#
|
|
795 |
# The specific issue with weaves:
|
|
796 |
# B introduced a text ('foo') that is present in both C and D.
|
|
797 |
# If we do not include B (because it isn't an ancestor of E), then
|
|
798 |
# the A=>C and A=>D look like both sides independently introduce the
|
|
799 |
# text ('foo'). If F does not modify the text, it would still appear
|
|
800 |
# to have deleted on of the versions from C or D. If G then modifies
|
|
801 |
# 'foo', it should appear as superseding the value in F (since it
|
|
802 |
# came from B), rather than conflict because of the resolution during
|
|
803 |
# C & D.
|
|
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
804 |
self.add_rev('root', 'XX', [], 'qrs') |
805 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', ['XX'], 'abcdef') |
|
806 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['A'], 'axcdef') |
|
807 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', ['B'], 'axcdefg') |
|
808 |
self.add_rev('root', 'D', ['B'], 'haxcdef') |
|
809 |
self.add_rev('root', 'E', ['A'], 'abcdyf') |
|
810 |
# Simple combining of all texts
|
|
811 |
self.add_rev('root', 'F', ['C', 'D', 'E'], 'haxcdyfg') |
|
812 |
# combine and supersede 'x'
|
|
813 |
self.add_rev('root', 'G', ['C', 'D', 'E'], 'hazcdyfg') |
|
3514.2.6
by John Arbash Meinel
Write a (failing) test for complex ancestry. |
814 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('F', 'G') |
815 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
816 |
('unchanged', 'h\n'), |
|
817 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
3514.2.7
by John Arbash Meinel
Fix the failing test by implementing the fallback logic. |
818 |
('killed-base', 'b\n'), |
3514.2.6
by John Arbash Meinel
Write a (failing) test for complex ancestry. |
819 |
('killed-b', 'x\n'), |
820 |
('new-b', 'z\n'), |
|
821 |
('unchanged', 'c\n'), |
|
822 |
('unchanged', 'd\n'), |
|
823 |
('killed-base', 'e\n'), |
|
824 |
('unchanged', 'y\n'), |
|
825 |
('unchanged', 'f\n'), |
|
826 |
('unchanged', 'g\n')], |
|
827 |
list(plan)) |
|
828 |
||
3514.2.12
by John Arbash Meinel
Start refactoring into helper functions |
829 |
def assertRemoveExternalReferences(self, filtered_parent_map, |
830 |
child_map, tails, parent_map): |
|
831 |
"""Assert results for _PlanMerge._remove_external_references."""
|
|
832 |
(act_filtered_parent_map, act_child_map, |
|
833 |
act_tails) = _PlanMerge._remove_external_references(parent_map) |
|
834 |
||
835 |
# The parent map *should* preserve ordering, but the ordering of
|
|
836 |
# children is not strictly defined
|
|
837 |
# child_map = dict((k, sorted(children))
|
|
838 |
# for k, children in child_map.iteritems())
|
|
839 |
# act_child_map = dict(k, sorted(children)
|
|
840 |
# for k, children in act_child_map.iteritems())
|
|
841 |
self.assertEqual(filtered_parent_map, act_filtered_parent_map) |
|
842 |
self.assertEqual(child_map, act_child_map) |
|
843 |
self.assertEqual(sorted(tails), sorted(act_tails)) |
|
844 |
||
845 |
def test__remove_external_references(self): |
|
846 |
# First, nothing to remove
|
|
847 |
self.assertRemoveExternalReferences({3: [2], 2: [1], 1: []}, |
|
848 |
{1: [2], 2: [3], 3: []}, [1], {3: [2], 2: [1], 1: []}) |
|
849 |
# The reverse direction
|
|
850 |
self.assertRemoveExternalReferences({1: [2], 2: [3], 3: []}, |
|
851 |
{3: [2], 2: [1], 1: []}, [3], {1: [2], 2: [3], 3: []}) |
|
852 |
# Extra references
|
|
853 |
self.assertRemoveExternalReferences({3: [2], 2: [1], 1: []}, |
|
854 |
{1: [2], 2: [3], 3: []}, [1], {3: [2, 4], 2: [1, 5], 1: [6]}) |
|
855 |
# Multiple tails
|
|
856 |
self.assertRemoveExternalReferences( |
|
857 |
{4: [2, 3], 3: [], 2: [1], 1: []}, |
|
858 |
{1: [2], 2: [4], 3: [4], 4: []}, |
|
859 |
[1, 3], |
|
860 |
{4: [2, 3], 3: [5], 2: [1], 1: [6]}) |
|
861 |
# Multiple children
|
|
862 |
self.assertRemoveExternalReferences( |
|
863 |
{1: [3], 2: [3, 4], 3: [], 4: []}, |
|
864 |
{1: [], 2: [], 3: [1, 2], 4: [2]}, |
|
865 |
[3, 4], |
|
866 |
{1: [3], 2: [3, 4], 3: [5], 4: []}) |
|
867 |
||
3514.2.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Add the ability to prune extra tails from the parent_map. |
868 |
def assertPruneTails(self, pruned_map, tails, parent_map): |
869 |
child_map = {} |
|
870 |
for key, parent_keys in parent_map.iteritems(): |
|
871 |
child_map.setdefault(key, []) |
|
872 |
for pkey in parent_keys: |
|
873 |
child_map.setdefault(pkey, []).append(key) |
|
874 |
_PlanMerge._prune_tails(parent_map, child_map, tails) |
|
875 |
self.assertEqual(pruned_map, parent_map) |
|
876 |
||
877 |
def test__prune_tails(self): |
|
878 |
# Nothing requested to prune
|
|
879 |
self.assertPruneTails({1: [], 2: [], 3: []}, [], |
|
880 |
{1: [], 2: [], 3: []}) |
|
881 |
# Prune a single entry
|
|
882 |
self.assertPruneTails({1: [], 3: []}, [2], |
|
883 |
{1: [], 2: [], 3: []}) |
|
884 |
# Prune a chain
|
|
885 |
self.assertPruneTails({1: []}, [3], |
|
886 |
{1: [], 2: [3], 3: []}) |
|
887 |
# Prune a chain with a diamond
|
|
888 |
self.assertPruneTails({1: []}, [5], |
|
889 |
{1: [], 2: [3, 4], 3: [5], 4: [5], 5: []}) |
|
890 |
# Prune a partial chain
|
|
891 |
self.assertPruneTails({1: [6], 6:[]}, [5], |
|
892 |
{1: [2, 6], 2: [3, 4], 3: [5], 4: [5], 5: [], |
|
893 |
6: []}) |
|
894 |
# Prune a chain with multiple tips, that pulls out intermediates
|
|
895 |
self.assertPruneTails({1:[3], 3:[]}, [4, 5], |
|
896 |
{1: [2, 3], 2: [4, 5], 3: [], 4:[], 5:[]}) |
|
897 |
self.assertPruneTails({1:[3], 3:[]}, [5, 4], |
|
898 |
{1: [2, 3], 2: [4, 5], 3: [], 4:[], 5:[]}) |
|
899 |
||
3062.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Add support for plan-merge with a base |
900 |
def test_subtract_plans(self): |
901 |
old_plan = [ |
|
902 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
903 |
('new-a', 'b\n'), |
|
904 |
('killed-a', 'c\n'), |
|
905 |
('new-b', 'd\n'), |
|
906 |
('new-b', 'e\n'), |
|
907 |
('killed-b', 'f\n'), |
|
908 |
('killed-b', 'g\n'), |
|
909 |
]
|
|
910 |
new_plan = [ |
|
911 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
912 |
('new-a', 'b\n'), |
|
913 |
('killed-a', 'c\n'), |
|
914 |
('new-b', 'd\n'), |
|
915 |
('new-b', 'h\n'), |
|
916 |
('killed-b', 'f\n'), |
|
917 |
('killed-b', 'i\n'), |
|
918 |
]
|
|
919 |
subtracted_plan = [ |
|
920 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
921 |
('new-a', 'b\n'), |
|
922 |
('killed-a', 'c\n'), |
|
923 |
('new-b', 'h\n'), |
|
924 |
('unchanged', 'f\n'), |
|
925 |
('killed-b', 'i\n'), |
|
926 |
]
|
|
927 |
self.assertEqual(subtracted_plan, |
|
3062.2.3
by Aaron Bentley
Sync up with bzr.dev API changes |
928 |
list(_PlanMerge._subtract_plans(old_plan, new_plan))) |
3062.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Add support for plan-merge with a base |
929 |
|
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
930 |
def setup_merge_with_base(self): |
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
931 |
self.add_rev('root', 'COMMON', [], 'abc') |
932 |
self.add_rev('root', 'THIS', ['COMMON'], 'abcd') |
|
933 |
self.add_rev('root', 'BASE', ['COMMON'], 'eabc') |
|
934 |
self.add_rev('root', 'OTHER', ['BASE'], 'eafb') |
|
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
935 |
|
936 |
def test_plan_merge_with_base(self): |
|
937 |
self.setup_merge_with_base() |
|
3062.2.3
by Aaron Bentley
Sync up with bzr.dev API changes |
938 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('THIS', 'OTHER', 'BASE') |
3062.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Add support for plan-merge with a base |
939 |
self.assertEqual([('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
940 |
('new-b', 'f\n'), |
|
941 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
942 |
('killed-b', 'c\n'), |
|
943 |
('new-a', 'd\n') |
|
944 |
], list(plan)) |
|
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
945 |
|
946 |
def test_plan_lca_merge(self): |
|
947 |
self.setup_plan_merge() |
|
948 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_lca_merge('B', 'C') |
|
949 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
950 |
('new-b', 'f\n'), |
|
951 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
952 |
('killed-b', 'c\n'), |
|
953 |
('new-a', 'e\n'), |
|
954 |
('new-a', 'h\n'), |
|
955 |
('killed-a', 'b\n'), |
|
956 |
('unchanged', 'g\n')], |
|
957 |
list(plan)) |
|
958 |
||
959 |
def test_plan_lca_merge_uncommitted_files(self): |
|
960 |
self.setup_plan_merge_uncommitted() |
|
961 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_lca_merge('B:', 'C:') |
|
962 |
self.assertEqual([ |
|
963 |
('new-b', 'f\n'), |
|
964 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
965 |
('killed-b', 'c\n'), |
|
966 |
('new-a', 'e\n'), |
|
967 |
('new-a', 'h\n'), |
|
968 |
('killed-a', 'b\n'), |
|
969 |
('unchanged', 'g\n')], |
|
970 |
list(plan)) |
|
971 |
||
972 |
def test_plan_lca_merge_with_base(self): |
|
973 |
self.setup_merge_with_base() |
|
974 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_lca_merge('THIS', 'OTHER', 'BASE') |
|
975 |
self.assertEqual([('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
976 |
('new-b', 'f\n'), |
|
977 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
978 |
('killed-b', 'c\n'), |
|
979 |
('new-a', 'd\n') |
|
980 |
], list(plan)) |
|
981 |
||
982 |
def test_plan_lca_merge_with_criss_cross(self): |
|
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
983 |
self.add_version(('root', 'ROOT'), [], 'abc') |
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
984 |
# each side makes a change
|
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
985 |
self.add_version(('root', 'REV1'), [('root', 'ROOT')], 'abcd') |
986 |
self.add_version(('root', 'REV2'), [('root', 'ROOT')], 'abce') |
|
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
987 |
# both sides merge, discarding others' changes
|
3350.6.4
by Robert Collins
First cut at pluralised VersionedFiles. Some rather massive API incompatabilities, primarily because of the difficulty of coherence among competing stores. |
988 |
self.add_version(('root', 'LCA1'), |
989 |
[('root', 'REV1'), ('root', 'REV2')], 'abcd') |
|
990 |
self.add_version(('root', 'LCA2'), |
|
991 |
[('root', 'REV1'), ('root', 'REV2')], 'fabce') |
|
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
992 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_lca_merge('LCA1', 'LCA2') |
3144.3.10
by Aaron Bentley
Use correct index when emitting conflicted-b |
993 |
self.assertEqual([('new-b', 'f\n'), |
994 |
('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
995 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
996 |
('unchanged', 'c\n'), |
|
3144.3.3
by Aaron Bentley
Update test for new conflicted types |
997 |
('conflicted-a', 'd\n'), |
998 |
('conflicted-b', 'e\n'), |
|
3144.3.1
by Aaron Bentley
Implement LCA merge, with problematic conflict markers |
999 |
], list(plan)) |
3144.5.3
by Aaron Bentley
Test interesting_files for LCA merge |
1000 |
|
3287.17.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Fix bug #235715 by using the empty list as the text for a base of NULL_REVISION. |
1001 |
def test_plan_lca_merge_with_null(self): |
3350.6.5
by Robert Collins
Update to bzr.dev. |
1002 |
self.add_version(('root', 'A'), [], 'ab') |
1003 |
self.add_version(('root', 'B'), [], 'bc') |
|
3287.17.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Fix bug #235715 by using the empty list as the text for a base of NULL_REVISION. |
1004 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_lca_merge('A', 'B') |
1005 |
self.assertEqual([('new-a', 'a\n'), |
|
1006 |
('unchanged', 'b\n'), |
|
1007 |
('new-b', 'c\n'), |
|
1008 |
], list(plan)) |
|
1009 |
||
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1010 |
def test_plan_merge_with_delete_and_change(self): |
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
1011 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', [], 'a') |
1012 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', ['C'], 'b') |
|
1013 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['C'], '') |
|
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1014 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('A', 'B') |
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1015 |
self.assertEqual([('killed-both', 'a\n'), |
1016 |
('new-a', 'b\n'), |
|
1017 |
], list(plan)) |
|
1018 |
||
1019 |
def test_plan_merge_with_move_and_change(self): |
|
3514.2.17
by John Arbash Meinel
On Ian's suggestion, change the 'plan_merge' tests to use the clearer 'add_rev' instead of 'add_version' |
1020 |
self.add_rev('root', 'C', [], 'abcd') |
1021 |
self.add_rev('root', 'A', ['C'], 'acbd') |
|
1022 |
self.add_rev('root', 'B', ['C'], 'aBcd') |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1023 |
plan = self.plan_merge_vf.plan_merge('A', 'B') |
1024 |
self.assertEqual([('unchanged', 'a\n'), |
|
1025 |
('new-a', 'c\n'), |
|
1026 |
('killed-b', 'b\n'), |
|
1027 |
('new-b', 'B\n'), |
|
1028 |
('killed-a', 'c\n'), |
|
1029 |
('unchanged', 'd\n'), |
|
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1030 |
], list(plan)) |
1031 |
||
3144.5.3
by Aaron Bentley
Test interesting_files for LCA merge |
1032 |
|
1033 |
class TestMergeImplementation(object): |
|
1034 |
||
1035 |
def do_merge(self, target_tree, source_tree, **kwargs): |
|
1036 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
1037 |
target_tree, source_tree.last_revision(), |
|
1038 |
other_branch=source_tree.branch) |
|
1039 |
merger.merge_type=self.merge_type |
|
1040 |
for name, value in kwargs.items(): |
|
1041 |
setattr(merger, name, value) |
|
1042 |
merger.do_merge() |
|
1043 |
||
1044 |
def test_merge_specific_file(self): |
|
1045 |
this_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('this') |
|
1046 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
1047 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
1048 |
self.build_tree_contents([ |
|
1049 |
('this/file1', 'a\nb\n'), |
|
1050 |
('this/file2', 'a\nb\n') |
|
1051 |
])
|
|
1052 |
this_tree.add(['file1', 'file2']) |
|
1053 |
this_tree.commit('Added files') |
|
1054 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other').open_workingtree() |
|
1055 |
self.build_tree_contents([ |
|
1056 |
('other/file1', 'a\nb\nc\n'), |
|
1057 |
('other/file2', 'a\nb\nc\n') |
|
1058 |
])
|
|
1059 |
other_tree.commit('modified both') |
|
1060 |
self.build_tree_contents([ |
|
1061 |
('this/file1', 'd\na\nb\n'), |
|
1062 |
('this/file2', 'd\na\nb\n') |
|
1063 |
])
|
|
1064 |
this_tree.commit('modified both') |
|
1065 |
self.do_merge(this_tree, other_tree, interesting_files=['file1']) |
|
1066 |
self.assertFileEqual('d\na\nb\nc\n', 'this/file1') |
|
1067 |
self.assertFileEqual('d\na\nb\n', 'this/file2') |
|
1068 |
||
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1069 |
def test_merge_move_and_change(self): |
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1070 |
this_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('this') |
1071 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
1072 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
1073 |
self.build_tree_contents([ |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1074 |
('this/file1', 'line 1\nline 2\nline 3\nline 4\n'), |
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1075 |
])
|
1076 |
this_tree.add('file1',) |
|
1077 |
this_tree.commit('Added file') |
|
1078 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other').open_workingtree() |
|
1079 |
self.build_tree_contents([ |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1080 |
('other/file1', 'line 1\nline 2 to 2.1\nline 3\nline 4\n'), |
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1081 |
])
|
3514.2.16
by John Arbash Meinel
Review feedback from Ian. |
1082 |
other_tree.commit('Changed 2 to 2.1') |
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1083 |
self.build_tree_contents([ |
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1084 |
('this/file1', 'line 1\nline 3\nline 2\nline 4\n'), |
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1085 |
])
|
3514.2.16
by John Arbash Meinel
Review feedback from Ian. |
1086 |
this_tree.commit('Swapped 2 & 3') |
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1087 |
self.do_merge(this_tree, other_tree) |
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1088 |
self.assertFileEqual('line 1\n' |
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1089 |
'<<<<<<< TREE\n' |
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1090 |
'line 3\n' |
1091 |
'line 2\n' |
|
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1092 |
'=======\n' |
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1093 |
'line 2 to 2.1\n' |
1094 |
'line 3\n' |
|
1095 |
'>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE\n' |
|
1096 |
'line 4\n', 'this/file1') |
|
3514.2.1
by Aaron Bentley
Test for correct conflicts on delete + change |
1097 |
|
4312.1.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a per-implementation test that deleting lines conflicts with modifying lines. |
1098 |
def test_modify_conflicts_with_delete(self): |
1099 |
# If one side deletes a line, and the other modifies that line, then
|
|
1100 |
# the modification should be considered a conflict
|
|
1101 |
builder = self.make_branch_builder('test') |
|
1102 |
builder.start_series() |
|
1103 |
builder.build_snapshot('BASE-id', None, |
|
1104 |
[('add', ('', None, 'directory', None)), |
|
1105 |
('add', ('foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\nd\ne\n')), |
|
1106 |
])
|
|
1107 |
# Delete 'b\n'
|
|
1108 |
builder.build_snapshot('OTHER-id', ['BASE-id'], |
|
1109 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'a\nc\nd\ne\n'))]) |
|
1110 |
# Modify 'b\n', add 'X\n'
|
|
1111 |
builder.build_snapshot('THIS-id', ['BASE-id'], |
|
1112 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'a\nb2\nc\nd\nX\ne\n'))]) |
|
1113 |
builder.finish_series() |
|
1114 |
branch = builder.get_branch() |
|
1115 |
this_tree = branch.bzrdir.create_workingtree() |
|
1116 |
this_tree.lock_write() |
|
1117 |
self.addCleanup(this_tree.unlock) |
|
1118 |
other_tree = this_tree.bzrdir.sprout('other', 'OTHER-id').open_workingtree() |
|
1119 |
self.do_merge(this_tree, other_tree) |
|
1120 |
if self.merge_type is _mod_merge.LCAMerger: |
|
1121 |
self.expectFailure("lca merge doesn't track deleted lines", |
|
1122 |
self.assertFileEqual, |
|
1123 |
'a\n' |
|
1124 |
'<<<<<<< TREE\n' |
|
1125 |
'b2\n' |
|
1126 |
'=======\n' |
|
1127 |
'>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE\n' |
|
1128 |
'c\n' |
|
1129 |
'd\n' |
|
1130 |
'X\n' |
|
1131 |
'e\n', 'test/foo') |
|
1132 |
else: |
|
1133 |
self.assertFileEqual( |
|
1134 |
'a\n' |
|
1135 |
'<<<<<<< TREE\n' |
|
1136 |
'b2\n' |
|
1137 |
'=======\n' |
|
1138 |
'>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE\n' |
|
1139 |
'c\n' |
|
1140 |
'd\n' |
|
1141 |
'X\n' |
|
1142 |
'e\n', 'test/foo') |
|
1143 |
||
3144.5.3
by Aaron Bentley
Test interesting_files for LCA merge |
1144 |
|
1145 |
class TestMerge3Merge(TestCaseWithTransport, TestMergeImplementation): |
|
1146 |
||
1147 |
merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
1148 |
||
1149 |
||
1150 |
class TestWeaveMerge(TestCaseWithTransport, TestMergeImplementation): |
|
1151 |
||
1152 |
merge_type = _mod_merge.WeaveMerger |
|
1153 |
||
1154 |
||
1155 |
class TestLCAMerge(TestCaseWithTransport, TestMergeImplementation): |
|
1156 |
||
1157 |
merge_type = _mod_merge.LCAMerger |
|
3514.2.2
by John Arbash Meinel
Restore a real weave merge to 'bzr merge --weave'. |
1158 |
|
1159 |
def test_merge_move_and_change(self): |
|
1160 |
self.expectFailure("lca merge doesn't conflict for move and change", |
|
1161 |
super(TestLCAMerge, self).test_merge_move_and_change) |
|
3514.4.6
by John Arbash Meinel
Merge in the BranchBuilder updates, which brings in a newer bzr.dev |
1162 |
|
3514.4.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Update Merger to set a flag when we encounter a criss-cross merge. |
1163 |
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1164 |
class LoggingMerger(object): |
1165 |
# These seem to be the required attributes
|
|
1166 |
requires_base = False |
|
1167 |
supports_reprocess = False |
|
1168 |
supports_show_base = False |
|
1169 |
supports_cherrypick = False |
|
1170 |
# We intentionally do not define supports_lca_trees
|
|
1171 |
||
1172 |
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): |
|
1173 |
self.args = args |
|
1174 |
self.kwargs = kwargs |
|
1175 |
||
1176 |
||
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1177 |
class TestMergerBase(TestCaseWithMemoryTransport): |
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1178 |
"""Common functionality for Merger tests that don't write to disk."""
|
3514.4.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Update Merger to set a flag when we encounter a criss-cross merge. |
1179 |
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1180 |
def get_builder(self): |
1181 |
builder = self.make_branch_builder('path') |
|
1182 |
builder.start_series() |
|
1183 |
self.addCleanup(builder.finish_series) |
|
1184 |
return builder |
|
1185 |
||
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1186 |
def setup_simple_graph(self): |
1187 |
"""Create a simple 3-node graph.
|
|
1188 |
||
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1189 |
:return: A BranchBuilder
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1190 |
"""
|
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1191 |
#
|
1192 |
# A
|
|
1193 |
# |\
|
|
1194 |
# B C
|
|
1195 |
#
|
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1196 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1197 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
1198 |
[('add', ('', None, 'directory', None))]) |
|
1199 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1200 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1201 |
return builder |
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1202 |
|
1203 |
def setup_criss_cross_graph(self): |
|
1204 |
"""Create a 5-node graph with a criss-cross.
|
|
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1205 |
|
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1206 |
:return: A BranchBuilder
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1207 |
"""
|
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1208 |
# A
|
1209 |
# |\
|
|
1210 |
# B C
|
|
1211 |
# |X|
|
|
1212 |
# D E
|
|
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1213 |
builder = self.setup_simple_graph() |
1214 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1215 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1216 |
return builder |
|
1217 |
||
3514.4.24
by John Arbash Meinel
Implement support for 'interesting_files' and 'interesting_ids' for _entries_lca |
1218 |
def make_Merger(self, builder, other_revision_id, |
1219 |
interesting_files=None, interesting_ids=None): |
|
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1220 |
"""Make a Merger object from a branch builder"""
|
1221 |
mem_tree = memorytree.MemoryTree.create_on_branch(builder.get_branch()) |
|
1222 |
mem_tree.lock_write() |
|
1223 |
self.addCleanup(mem_tree.unlock) |
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1224 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1225 |
mem_tree, other_revision_id) |
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1226 |
merger.set_interesting_files(interesting_files) |
1227 |
# It seems there is no matching function for set_interesting_ids
|
|
1228 |
merger.interesting_ids = interesting_ids |
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1229 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
1230 |
return merger |
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1231 |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1232 |
|
1233 |
class TestMergerInMemory(TestMergerBase): |
|
1234 |
||
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1235 |
def test_find_base(self): |
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1236 |
merger = self.make_Merger(self.setup_simple_graph(), 'C-id') |
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1237 |
self.assertEqual('A-id', merger.base_rev_id) |
1238 |
self.assertFalse(merger._is_criss_cross) |
|
1239 |
self.assertIs(None, merger._lca_trees) |
|
1240 |
||
1241 |
def test_find_base_criss_cross(self): |
|
3514.4.14
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test which shows that the ordering switches when you pick the other parent. |
1242 |
builder = self.setup_criss_cross_graph() |
1243 |
merger = self.make_Merger(builder, 'E-id') |
|
3514.4.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Update Merger to set a flag when we encounter a criss-cross merge. |
1244 |
self.assertEqual('A-id', merger.base_rev_id) |
1245 |
self.assertTrue(merger._is_criss_cross) |
|
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1246 |
self.assertEqual(['B-id', 'C-id'], [t.get_revision_id() |
1247 |
for t in merger._lca_trees]) |
|
3514.4.14
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test which shows that the ordering switches when you pick the other parent. |
1248 |
# If we swap the order, we should get a different lca order
|
1249 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['E-id'], []) |
|
1250 |
merger = self.make_Merger(builder, 'D-id') |
|
1251 |
self.assertEqual(['C-id', 'B-id'], [t.get_revision_id() |
|
1252 |
for t in merger._lca_trees]) |
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1253 |
|
3514.4.23
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when there are more than 2 LCAs while searching for the unique lca. |
1254 |
def test_find_base_triple_criss_cross(self): |
1255 |
# A-.
|
|
1256 |
# / \ \
|
|
1257 |
# B C F # F is merged into both branches
|
|
1258 |
# |\ /| |
|
|
1259 |
# | X | |\
|
|
1260 |
# |/ \| | :
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1261 |
# : D E |
|
1262 |
# \| |/
|
|
3514.4.23
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when there are more than 2 LCAs while searching for the unique lca. |
1263 |
# G H
|
1264 |
builder = self.setup_criss_cross_graph() |
|
1265 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1266 |
builder.build_snapshot('H-id', ['E-id', 'F-id'], []) |
|
1267 |
builder.build_snapshot('G-id', ['D-id', 'F-id'], []) |
|
1268 |
merger = self.make_Merger(builder, 'H-id') |
|
1269 |
self.assertEqual(['B-id', 'C-id', 'F-id'], |
|
1270 |
[t.get_revision_id() for t in merger._lca_trees]) |
|
1271 |
||
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1272 |
def test_no_criss_cross_passed_to_merge_type(self): |
1273 |
class LCATreesMerger(LoggingMerger): |
|
1274 |
supports_lca_trees = True |
|
1275 |
||
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1276 |
merger = self.make_Merger(self.setup_simple_graph(), 'C-id') |
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1277 |
merger.merge_type = LCATreesMerger |
1278 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
1279 |
self.assertIsInstance(merge_obj, LCATreesMerger) |
|
1280 |
self.assertFalse('lca_trees' in merge_obj.kwargs) |
|
1281 |
||
1282 |
def test_criss_cross_passed_to_merge_type(self): |
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1283 |
merger = self.make_Merger(self.setup_criss_cross_graph(), 'E-id') |
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1284 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
1285 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1286 |
self.assertEqual(['B-id', 'C-id'], [t.get_revision_id() |
1287 |
for t in merger._lca_trees]) |
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1288 |
|
1289 |
def test_criss_cross_not_supported_merge_type(self): |
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1290 |
merger = self.make_Merger(self.setup_criss_cross_graph(), 'E-id') |
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1291 |
# We explicitly do not define supports_lca_trees
|
1292 |
merger.merge_type = LoggingMerger |
|
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1293 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1294 |
self.assertIsInstance(merge_obj, LoggingMerger) |
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1295 |
self.assertFalse('lca_trees' in merge_obj.kwargs) |
1296 |
||
1297 |
def test_criss_cross_unsupported_merge_type(self): |
|
1298 |
class UnsupportedLCATreesMerger(LoggingMerger): |
|
1299 |
supports_lca_trees = False |
|
1300 |
||
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1301 |
merger = self.make_Merger(self.setup_criss_cross_graph(), 'E-id') |
3514.4.4
by John Arbash Meinel
Test that the lca_trees are passed down to the Merger object when appropriate. |
1302 |
merger.merge_type = UnsupportedLCATreesMerger |
1303 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
1304 |
self.assertIsInstance(merge_obj, UnsupportedLCATreesMerger) |
|
1305 |
self.assertFalse('lca_trees' in merge_obj.kwargs) |
|
3514.4.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Initial work on _entries_lca. |
1306 |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1307 |
|
1308 |
class TestMergerEntriesLCA(TestMergerBase): |
|
1309 |
||
3514.4.24
by John Arbash Meinel
Implement support for 'interesting_files' and 'interesting_ids' for _entries_lca |
1310 |
def make_merge_obj(self, builder, other_revision_id, |
1311 |
interesting_files=None, interesting_ids=None): |
|
1312 |
merger = self.make_Merger(builder, other_revision_id, |
|
1313 |
interesting_files=interesting_files, |
|
1314 |
interesting_ids=interesting_ids) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1315 |
return merger.make_merger() |
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1316 |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1317 |
def test_simple(self): |
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1318 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1319 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
1320 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1321 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1322 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1323 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nb\nC\nc\n'))]) |
|
1324 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1325 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nB\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1326 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1327 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nB\nb\nC\nc\nE\n'))]) |
|
1328 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1329 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nB\nb\nC\nc\n'))]) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1330 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
3514.4.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Initial work on _entries_lca. |
1331 |
|
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1332 |
self.assertEqual(['B-id', 'C-id'], [t.get_revision_id() |
1333 |
for t in merge_obj._lca_trees]) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1334 |
self.assertEqual('A-id', merge_obj.base_tree.get_revision_id()) |
3514.4.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Initial work on _entries_lca. |
1335 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
1336 |
||
1337 |
# (file_id, changed, parents, names, executable)
|
|
1338 |
# BASE, lca1, lca2, OTHER, THIS
|
|
3514.4.7
by John Arbash Meinel
switch over test_merge to using the new BranchBuilder api. |
1339 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
3514.4.12
by John Arbash Meinel
add more filtering for when a directory hasn't actually changed. |
1340 |
self.assertEqual([('a-id', True, |
3514.4.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Initial work on _entries_lca. |
1341 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
1342 |
((u'a', [u'a', u'a']), u'a', u'a'), |
|
1343 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1344 |
], entries) |
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1345 |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1346 |
def test_not_in_base(self): |
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1347 |
# LCAs all have the same last-modified revision for the file, as do
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1348 |
# the tips, but the base has something different
|
1349 |
# A base, doesn't have the file
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1350 |
# |\
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1351 |
# B C B introduces 'foo', C introduces 'bar'
|
1352 |
# |X|
|
|
1353 |
# D E D and E now both have 'foo' and 'bar'
|
|
1354 |
# |X|
|
|
1355 |
# F G the files are now in F, G, D and E, but not in A
|
|
1356 |
# G modifies 'bar'
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1357 |
|
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1358 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
1359 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1360 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None))]) |
|
1361 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1362 |
[('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1363 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1364 |
[('add', (u'bar', 'bar-id', 'file', 'd\ne\nf\n'))]) |
|
1365 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1366 |
[('add', (u'bar', 'bar-id', 'file', 'd\ne\nf\n'))]) |
|
1367 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1368 |
[('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1369 |
builder.build_snapshot('G-id', ['E-id', 'D-id'], |
|
1370 |
[('modify', (u'bar-id', 'd\ne\nf\nG\n'))]) |
|
1371 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['D-id', 'E-id'], []) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1372 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'G-id') |
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1373 |
|
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1374 |
self.assertEqual(['D-id', 'E-id'], [t.get_revision_id() |
1375 |
for t in merge_obj._lca_trees]) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1376 |
self.assertEqual('A-id', merge_obj.base_tree.get_revision_id()) |
3514.4.10
by John Arbash Meinel
Test the case where BASE is missing a file that is present in THIS, OTHER and all LCAs. |
1377 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
1378 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1379 |
self.assertEqual([('bar-id', True, |
|
1380 |
((None, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1381 |
((None, [u'bar', u'bar']), u'bar', u'bar'), |
|
1382 |
((None, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1383 |
], entries) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1384 |
|
1385 |
def test_not_in_this(self): |
|
1386 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1387 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1388 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1389 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1390 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
1391 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nB\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1392 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
1393 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nb\nC\nc\n'))]) |
|
1394 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1395 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nB\nb\nC\nc\nE\n'))]) |
|
1396 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1397 |
[('unversion', 'a-id')]) |
|
1398 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1399 |
||
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1400 |
self.assertEqual(['B-id', 'C-id'], [t.get_revision_id() |
1401 |
for t in merge_obj._lca_trees]) |
|
3514.4.11
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when an entry is missing in THIS |
1402 |
self.assertEqual('A-id', merge_obj.base_tree.get_revision_id()) |
1403 |
||
1404 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1405 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1406 |
self.assertEqual([('a-id', True, |
|
1407 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, None), |
|
1408 |
((u'a', [u'a', u'a']), u'a', None), |
|
1409 |
((False, [False, False]), False, None)), |
|
1410 |
], entries) |
|
1411 |
||
3514.4.20
by John Arbash Meinel
Use the _lca_multi_way to work out if there is actually a kind/parent/name/content change. |
1412 |
def test_file_not_in_one_lca(self): |
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1413 |
# A # just root
|
1414 |
# |\
|
|
1415 |
# B C # B no file, C introduces a file
|
|
1416 |
# |X|
|
|
1417 |
# D E # D and E both have the file, unchanged from C
|
|
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1418 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
1419 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1420 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None))]) |
|
1421 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1422 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1423 |
[('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
3514.4.20
by John Arbash Meinel
Use the _lca_multi_way to work out if there is actually a kind/parent/name/content change. |
1424 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) # Inherited from C |
1425 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], # Merged from C |
|
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1426 |
[('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
1427 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1428 |
||
1429 |
self.assertEqual(['B-id', 'C-id'], [t.get_revision_id() |
|
1430 |
for t in merge_obj._lca_trees]) |
|
1431 |
self.assertEqual('A-id', merge_obj.base_tree.get_revision_id()) |
|
1432 |
||
1433 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
3514.4.20
by John Arbash Meinel
Use the _lca_multi_way to work out if there is actually a kind/parent/name/content change. |
1434 |
self.assertEqual([], entries) |
3514.4.13
by John Arbash Meinel
Switch the lca_trees to be in 'find_merge_order'. |
1435 |
|
3514.4.15
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle when OTHER doesn't have the entry. |
1436 |
def test_not_in_other(self): |
1437 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1438 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1439 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1440 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1441 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1442 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1443 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1444 |
[('unversion', 'a-id')]) |
|
1445 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1446 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1447 |
||
1448 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1449 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1450 |
self.assertEqual([('a-id', True, |
|
1451 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), None, root_id), |
|
1452 |
((u'a', [u'a', u'a']), None, u'a'), |
|
1453 |
((False, [False, False]), None, False)), |
|
1454 |
], entries) |
|
1455 |
||
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1456 |
def test_not_in_other_or_lca(self): |
1457 |
# A base, introduces 'foo'
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1458 |
# |\
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1459 |
# B C B nothing, C deletes foo
|
1460 |
# |X|
|
|
1461 |
# D E D restores foo (same as B), E leaves it deleted
|
|
3948.1.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Fix an edge case with deleted files and criss-cross merges. |
1462 |
# Analysis:
|
1463 |
# A => B, no changes
|
|
1464 |
# A => C, delete foo (C should supersede B)
|
|
1465 |
# C => D, restore foo
|
|
1466 |
# C => E, no changes
|
|
1467 |
# D would then win 'cleanly' and no record would be given
|
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1468 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
1469 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1470 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1471 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1472 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1473 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1474 |
[('unversion', 'foo-id')]) |
|
1475 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1476 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1477 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1478 |
||
1479 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
3948.1.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Fix an edge case with deleted files and criss-cross merges. |
1480 |
self.assertEqual([], entries) |
1481 |
||
1482 |
def test_not_in_other_mod_in_lca1_not_in_lca2(self): |
|
1483 |
# A base, introduces 'foo'
|
|
1484 |
# |\
|
|
1485 |
# B C B changes 'foo', C deletes foo
|
|
1486 |
# |X|
|
|
1487 |
# D E D restores foo (same as B), E leaves it deleted (as C)
|
|
1488 |
# Analysis:
|
|
1489 |
# A => B, modified foo
|
|
1490 |
# A => C, delete foo, C does not supersede B
|
|
1491 |
# B => D, no changes
|
|
1492 |
# C => D, resolve in favor of B
|
|
1493 |
# B => E, resolve in favor of E
|
|
1494 |
# C => E, no changes
|
|
1495 |
# In this case, we have a conflict of how the changes were resolved. E
|
|
1496 |
# picked C and D picked B, so we should issue a conflict
|
|
1497 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1498 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1499 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1500 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1501 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], [ |
|
1502 |
('modify', ('foo-id', 'new-content\n'))]) |
|
1503 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1504 |
[('unversion', 'foo-id')]) |
|
1505 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1506 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1507 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1508 |
||
1509 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
3948.1.4
by Vincent Ladeuil
More cleanup and fix overzealous previous one. |
1510 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1511 |
self.assertEqual([('foo-id', True, |
1512 |
((root_id, [root_id, None]), None, root_id), |
|
1513 |
((u'foo', [u'foo', None]), None, 'foo'), |
|
1514 |
((False, [False, None]), None, False)), |
|
1515 |
], entries) |
|
1516 |
||
3514.4.20
by John Arbash Meinel
Use the _lca_multi_way to work out if there is actually a kind/parent/name/content change. |
1517 |
def test_only_in_one_lca(self): |
3948.1.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Fix an edge case with deleted files and criss-cross merges. |
1518 |
# A add only root
|
1519 |
# |\
|
|
1520 |
# B C B nothing, C add file
|
|
1521 |
# |X|
|
|
1522 |
# D E D still has nothing, E removes file
|
|
1523 |
# Analysis:
|
|
1524 |
# B => D, no change
|
|
1525 |
# C => D, removed the file
|
|
1526 |
# B => E, no change
|
|
1527 |
# C => E, removed the file
|
|
1528 |
# Thus D & E have identical changes, and this is a no-op
|
|
1529 |
# Alternatively:
|
|
1530 |
# A => B, no change
|
|
1531 |
# A => C, add file, thus C supersedes B
|
|
1532 |
# w/ C=BASE, D=THIS, E=OTHER we have 'happy convergence'
|
|
3514.4.20
by John Arbash Meinel
Use the _lca_multi_way to work out if there is actually a kind/parent/name/content change. |
1533 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
1534 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1535 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None))]) |
|
1536 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1537 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1538 |
[('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1539 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1540 |
[('unversion', 'a-id')]) |
|
1541 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1542 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1543 |
||
1544 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
3948.1.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Fix an edge case with deleted files and criss-cross merges. |
1545 |
self.assertEqual([], entries) |
3514.4.20
by John Arbash Meinel
Use the _lca_multi_way to work out if there is actually a kind/parent/name/content change. |
1546 |
|
3514.4.16
by John Arbash Meinel
another test for only in OTHER |
1547 |
def test_only_in_other(self): |
1548 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1549 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1550 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None))]) |
|
1551 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1552 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1553 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1554 |
[('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1555 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1556 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1557 |
||
1558 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1559 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1560 |
self.assertEqual([('a-id', True, |
|
1561 |
((None, [None, None]), root_id, None), |
|
1562 |
((None, [None, None]), u'a', None), |
|
1563 |
((None, [None, None]), False, None)), |
|
1564 |
], entries) |
|
3514.4.19
by John Arbash Meinel
Add the _lca_multi_way function, and explicit tests. |
1565 |
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1566 |
def test_one_lca_supersedes(self): |
3514.4.41
by John Arbash Meinel
Some grammar and other clarity feedback from Aaron. |
1567 |
# One LCA supersedes the other LCAs last modified value, but the
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1568 |
# value is not the same as BASE.
|
1569 |
# A base, introduces 'foo', last mod A
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1570 |
# |\
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1571 |
# B C B modifies 'foo' (mod B), C does nothing (mod A)
|
1572 |
# |X|
|
|
1573 |
# D E D does nothing (mod B), E updates 'foo' (mod E)
|
|
1574 |
# |X|
|
|
1575 |
# F G F updates 'foo' (mod F). G does nothing (mod E)
|
|
1576 |
#
|
|
1577 |
# At this point, G should not be considered to modify 'foo', even
|
|
1578 |
# though its LCAs disagree. This is because the modification in E
|
|
1579 |
# completely supersedes the value in D.
|
|
1580 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1581 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1582 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1583 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'A content\n'))]) |
|
1584 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1585 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1586 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
1587 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1588 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1589 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'E content\n'))]) |
|
1590 |
builder.build_snapshot('G-id', ['E-id', 'D-id'], []) |
|
1591 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['D-id', 'E-id'], |
|
1592 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'F content\n'))]) |
|
1593 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'G-id') |
|
1594 |
||
1595 |
self.assertEqual([], list(merge_obj._entries_lca())) |
|
1596 |
||
3514.4.31
by John Arbash Meinel
Add expected failures for cases where we should be looking at more than |
1597 |
def test_one_lca_supersedes_path(self): |
1598 |
# Double-criss-cross merge, the ultimate base value is different from
|
|
1599 |
# the intermediate.
|
|
1600 |
# A value 'foo'
|
|
1601 |
# |\
|
|
1602 |
# B C B value 'bar', C = 'foo'
|
|
1603 |
# |X|
|
|
1604 |
# D E D = 'bar', E supersedes to 'bing'
|
|
1605 |
# |X|
|
|
1606 |
# F G F = 'bing', G supersedes to 'barry'
|
|
1607 |
#
|
|
1608 |
# In this case, we technically should not care about the value 'bar' for
|
|
1609 |
# D, because it was clearly superseded by E's 'bing'. The
|
|
1610 |
# per-file/attribute graph would actually look like:
|
|
1611 |
# A
|
|
1612 |
# |
|
|
1613 |
# B
|
|
1614 |
# |
|
|
1615 |
# E
|
|
1616 |
# |
|
|
1617 |
# G
|
|
1618 |
#
|
|
1619 |
# Because the other side of the merge never modifies the value, it just
|
|
1620 |
# takes the value from the merge.
|
|
1621 |
#
|
|
1622 |
# ATM this fails because we will prune 'foo' from the LCAs, but we
|
|
1623 |
# won't prune 'bar'. This is getting far off into edge-case land, so we
|
|
1624 |
# aren't supporting it yet.
|
|
1625 |
#
|
|
1626 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1627 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1628 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1629 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'A content\n'))]) |
|
1630 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1631 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1632 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
1633 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1634 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1635 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bing'))]) # override to bing |
|
1636 |
builder.build_snapshot('G-id', ['E-id', 'D-id'], |
|
1637 |
[('rename', ('bing', 'barry'))]) # override to barry |
|
1638 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['D-id', 'E-id'], |
|
1639 |
[('rename', ('bar', 'bing'))]) # Merge in E's change |
|
1640 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'G-id') |
|
1641 |
||
1642 |
self.expectFailure("We don't do an actual heads() check on lca values," |
|
1643 |
" or use the per-attribute graph", |
|
1644 |
self.assertEqual, [], list(merge_obj._entries_lca())) |
|
1645 |
||
1646 |
def test_one_lca_accidentally_pruned(self): |
|
1647 |
# Another incorrect resolution from the same basic flaw:
|
|
1648 |
# A value 'foo'
|
|
1649 |
# |\
|
|
1650 |
# B C B value 'bar', C = 'foo'
|
|
1651 |
# |X|
|
|
1652 |
# D E D = 'bar', E reverts to 'foo'
|
|
1653 |
# |X|
|
|
1654 |
# F G F = 'bing', G switches to 'bar'
|
|
1655 |
#
|
|
1656 |
# 'bar' will not be seen as an interesting change, because 'foo' will
|
|
1657 |
# be pruned from the LCAs, even though it was newly introduced by E
|
|
1658 |
# (superseding B).
|
|
1659 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1660 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1661 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1662 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'A content\n'))]) |
|
1663 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1664 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1665 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
1666 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1667 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1668 |
builder.build_snapshot('G-id', ['E-id', 'D-id'], |
|
1669 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
1670 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['D-id', 'E-id'], |
|
1671 |
[('rename', ('bar', 'bing'))]) # should end up conflicting |
|
1672 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'G-id') |
|
1673 |
||
1674 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1675 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1676 |
self.expectFailure("We prune values from BASE even when relevant.", |
|
1677 |
self.assertEqual, |
|
1678 |
[('foo-id', False, |
|
1679 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1680 |
((u'foo', [u'bar', u'foo']), u'bar', u'bing'), |
|
1681 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1682 |
], entries) |
|
1683 |
||
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1684 |
def test_both_sides_revert(self): |
1685 |
# Both sides of a criss-cross revert the text to the lca
|
|
1686 |
# A base, introduces 'foo'
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1687 |
# |\
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1688 |
# B C B modifies 'foo', C modifies 'foo'
|
1689 |
# |X|
|
|
1690 |
# D E D reverts to B, E reverts to C
|
|
1691 |
# This should conflict
|
|
1692 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1693 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1694 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1695 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'A content\n'))]) |
|
1696 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1697 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
1698 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1699 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'C content\n'))]) |
|
1700 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1701 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1702 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1703 |
||
1704 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1705 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1706 |
self.assertEqual([('foo-id', True, |
|
1707 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1708 |
((u'foo', [u'foo', u'foo']), u'foo', u'foo'), |
|
1709 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1710 |
], entries) |
|
1711 |
||
1712 |
def test_different_lca_resolve_one_side_updates_content(self): |
|
1713 |
# Both sides converge, but then one side updates the text.
|
|
1714 |
# A base, introduces 'foo'
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1715 |
# |\
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1716 |
# B C B modifies 'foo', C modifies 'foo'
|
1717 |
# |X|
|
|
1718 |
# D E D reverts to B, E reverts to C
|
|
1719 |
# |
|
|
1720 |
# F F updates to a new value
|
|
1721 |
# We need to emit an entry for 'foo', because D & E differed on the
|
|
1722 |
# merge resolution
|
|
1723 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1724 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1725 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1726 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'A content\n'))]) |
|
1727 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1728 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
1729 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1730 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'C content\n'))]) |
|
1731 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1732 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1733 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['D-id'], |
|
1734 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'F content\n'))]) |
|
1735 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1736 |
||
1737 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1738 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1739 |
self.assertEqual([('foo-id', True, |
|
1740 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1741 |
((u'foo', [u'foo', u'foo']), u'foo', u'foo'), |
|
1742 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1743 |
], entries) |
|
1744 |
||
1745 |
def test_same_lca_resolution_one_side_updates_content(self): |
|
1746 |
# Both sides converge, but then one side updates the text.
|
|
1747 |
# A base, introduces 'foo'
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
1748 |
# |\
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
1749 |
# B C B modifies 'foo', C modifies 'foo'
|
1750 |
# |X|
|
|
1751 |
# D E D and E use C's value
|
|
1752 |
# |
|
|
1753 |
# F F updates to a new value
|
|
1754 |
# I think it is a bug that this conflicts, but we don't have a way to
|
|
1755 |
# detect otherwise. And because of:
|
|
1756 |
# test_different_lca_resolve_one_side_updates_content
|
|
1757 |
# We need to conflict.
|
|
1758 |
||
1759 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1760 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1761 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1762 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'A content\n'))]) |
|
1763 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1764 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
1765 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1766 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'C content\n'))]) |
|
1767 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1768 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1769 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'C content\n'))]) # Same as E |
|
1770 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['D-id'], |
|
1771 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'F content\n'))]) |
|
1772 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1773 |
||
1774 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1775 |
self.expectFailure("We don't detect that LCA resolution was the" |
|
1776 |
" same on both sides", |
|
1777 |
self.assertEqual, [], entries) |
|
1778 |
||
3514.4.20
by John Arbash Meinel
Use the _lca_multi_way to work out if there is actually a kind/parent/name/content change. |
1779 |
def test_only_path_changed(self): |
3514.4.19
by John Arbash Meinel
Add the _lca_multi_way function, and explicit tests. |
1780 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
1781 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1782 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1783 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1784 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1785 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1786 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1787 |
[('rename', (u'a', u'b'))]) |
|
1788 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1789 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1790 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1791 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1792 |
# The content was not changed, only the path
|
|
1793 |
self.assertEqual([('a-id', False, |
|
1794 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1795 |
((u'a', [u'a', u'a']), u'b', u'a'), |
|
1796 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1797 |
], entries) |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
1798 |
|
1799 |
def test_kind_changed(self): |
|
1800 |
# Identical content, except 'D' changes a-id into a directory
|
|
1801 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1802 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1803 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1804 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1805 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1806 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1807 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1808 |
[('unversion', 'a-id'), |
|
1809 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'directory', None))]) |
|
1810 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1811 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1812 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1813 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1814 |
# Only the kind was changed (content)
|
|
1815 |
self.assertEqual([('a-id', True, |
|
1816 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1817 |
((u'a', [u'a', u'a']), u'a', u'a'), |
|
1818 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1819 |
], entries) |
|
1820 |
||
3514.4.35
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test that we only call get_symlink_target if the object should be a symlink. |
1821 |
def test_this_changed_kind(self): |
1822 |
# Identical content, but THIS changes a file to a directory
|
|
1823 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1824 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1825 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1826 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1827 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1828 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1829 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1830 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1831 |
[('unversion', 'a-id'), |
|
1832 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'directory', None))]) |
|
1833 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1834 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1835 |
# Only the kind was changed (content)
|
|
1836 |
self.assertEqual([], entries) |
|
1837 |
||
3514.4.24
by John Arbash Meinel
Implement support for 'interesting_files' and 'interesting_ids' for _entries_lca |
1838 |
def test_interesting_files(self): |
1839 |
# Two files modified, but we should filter one of them
|
|
1840 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1841 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1842 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1843 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n')), |
|
1844 |
('add', (u'b', 'b-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1845 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1846 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1847 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1848 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'new-content\n')), |
|
1849 |
('modify', ('b-id', 'new-content\n'))]) |
|
1850 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1851 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id', |
|
1852 |
interesting_files=['b']) |
|
1853 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1854 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1855 |
self.assertEqual([('b-id', True, |
|
1856 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1857 |
((u'b', [u'b', u'b']), u'b', u'b'), |
|
1858 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1859 |
], entries) |
|
1860 |
||
1861 |
def test_interesting_file_in_this(self): |
|
1862 |
# This renamed the file, but it should still match the entry in other
|
|
1863 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1864 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1865 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1866 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n')), |
|
1867 |
('add', (u'b', 'b-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1868 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1869 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1870 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1871 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'new-content\n')), |
|
1872 |
('modify', ('b-id', 'new-content\n'))]) |
|
1873 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1874 |
[('rename', ('b', 'c'))]) |
|
1875 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id', |
|
1876 |
interesting_files=['c']) |
|
1877 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1878 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1879 |
self.assertEqual([('b-id', True, |
|
1880 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1881 |
((u'b', [u'b', u'b']), u'b', u'c'), |
|
1882 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1883 |
], entries) |
|
1884 |
||
1885 |
def test_interesting_file_in_base(self): |
|
1886 |
# This renamed the file, but it should still match the entry in BASE
|
|
1887 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1888 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1889 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1890 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n')), |
|
1891 |
('add', (u'c', 'c-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1892 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1893 |
[('rename', ('c', 'b'))]) |
|
1894 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1895 |
[('rename', ('c', 'b'))]) |
|
1896 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1897 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'new-content\n')), |
|
1898 |
('modify', ('c-id', 'new-content\n'))]) |
|
1899 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1900 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id', |
|
1901 |
interesting_files=['c']) |
|
1902 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1903 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1904 |
self.assertEqual([('c-id', True, |
|
1905 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1906 |
((u'c', [u'b', u'b']), u'b', u'b'), |
|
1907 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1908 |
], entries) |
|
1909 |
||
1910 |
def test_interesting_file_in_lca(self): |
|
1911 |
# This renamed the file, but it should still match the entry in LCA
|
|
1912 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1913 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1914 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1915 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n')), |
|
1916 |
('add', (u'b', 'b-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1917 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
1918 |
[('rename', ('b', 'c'))]) |
|
1919 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1920 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1921 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'new-content\n')), |
|
1922 |
('modify', ('b-id', 'new-content\n'))]) |
|
1923 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1924 |
[('rename', ('c', 'b'))]) |
|
1925 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id', |
|
1926 |
interesting_files=['c']) |
|
1927 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1928 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1929 |
self.assertEqual([('b-id', True, |
|
1930 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1931 |
((u'b', [u'c', u'b']), u'b', u'b'), |
|
1932 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1933 |
], entries) |
|
1934 |
||
1935 |
def test_interesting_ids(self): |
|
1936 |
# Two files modified, but we should filter one of them
|
|
1937 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1938 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1939 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1940 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'content\n')), |
|
1941 |
('add', (u'b', 'b-id', 'file', 'content\n'))]) |
|
1942 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1943 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1944 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
1945 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'new-content\n')), |
|
1946 |
('modify', ('b-id', 'new-content\n'))]) |
|
1947 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
1948 |
merge_obj = self.make_merge_obj(builder, 'E-id', |
|
1949 |
interesting_ids=['b-id']) |
|
1950 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
1951 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
1952 |
self.assertEqual([('b-id', True, |
|
1953 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
1954 |
((u'b', [u'b', u'b']), u'b', u'b'), |
|
1955 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
1956 |
], entries) |
|
1957 |
||
1958 |
||
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
1959 |
|
1960 |
class TestMergerEntriesLCAOnDisk(tests.TestCaseWithTransport): |
|
1961 |
||
1962 |
def get_builder(self): |
|
1963 |
builder = self.make_branch_builder('path') |
|
1964 |
builder.start_series() |
|
1965 |
self.addCleanup(builder.finish_series) |
|
1966 |
return builder |
|
1967 |
||
3514.4.22
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle executable bit changes as well. |
1968 |
def get_wt_from_builder(self, builder): |
1969 |
"""Get a real WorkingTree from the builder."""
|
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
1970 |
the_branch = builder.get_branch() |
1971 |
wt = the_branch.bzrdir.create_workingtree() |
|
3514.4.31
by John Arbash Meinel
Add expected failures for cases where we should be looking at more than |
1972 |
# Note: This is a little bit ugly, but we are holding the branch
|
1973 |
# write-locked as part of the build process, and we would like to
|
|
1974 |
# maintain that. So we just force the WT to re-use the same
|
|
1975 |
# branch object.
|
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
1976 |
wt._branch = the_branch |
1977 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
1978 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
3514.4.22
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle executable bit changes as well. |
1979 |
return wt |
1980 |
||
1981 |
def do_merge(self, builder, other_revision_id): |
|
1982 |
wt = self.get_wt_from_builder(builder) |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
1983 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
1984 |
wt, other_revision_id) |
|
1985 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
1986 |
return wt, merger.do_merge() |
|
1987 |
||
1988 |
def test_simple_lca(self): |
|
1989 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
1990 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
1991 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
1992 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
1993 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1994 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
1995 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
1996 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
1997 |
[('modify', ('a-id', 'a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\n'))]) |
|
1998 |
wt, conflicts = self.do_merge(builder, 'E-id') |
|
1999 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2000 |
# The merge should have simply update the contents of 'a'
|
|
2001 |
self.assertEqual('a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\n', wt.get_file_text('a-id')) |
|
2002 |
||
2003 |
def test_conflict_without_lca(self): |
|
2004 |
# This test would cause a merge conflict, unless we use the lca trees
|
|
2005 |
# to determine the real ancestry
|
|
2006 |
# A Path at 'foo'
|
|
2007 |
# / \
|
|
2008 |
# B C Path renamed to 'bar' in B
|
|
2009 |
# |\ /|
|
|
2010 |
# | X |
|
|
2011 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2012 |
# D E Path at 'bar' in D and E
|
|
2013 |
# |
|
|
2014 |
# F Path at 'baz' in F, which supersedes 'bar' and 'foo'
|
|
2015 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2016 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2017 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2018 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
2019 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2020 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2021 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
2022 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], # merge the rename |
|
2023 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
2024 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['E-id'], |
|
2025 |
[('rename', ('bar', 'baz'))]) |
|
2026 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2027 |
wt, conflicts = self.do_merge(builder, 'F-id') |
|
2028 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
3514.4.22
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle executable bit changes as well. |
2029 |
# The merge should simply recognize that the final rename takes
|
2030 |
# precedence
|
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2031 |
self.assertEqual('baz', wt.id2path('foo-id')) |
2032 |
||
3514.4.22
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle executable bit changes as well. |
2033 |
def test_other_deletes_lca_renames(self): |
2034 |
# This test would cause a merge conflict, unless we use the lca trees
|
|
2035 |
# to determine the real ancestry
|
|
2036 |
# A Path at 'foo'
|
|
2037 |
# / \
|
|
2038 |
# B C Path renamed to 'bar' in B
|
|
2039 |
# |\ /|
|
|
2040 |
# | X |
|
|
2041 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2042 |
# D E Path at 'bar' in D and E
|
|
2043 |
# |
|
|
2044 |
# F F deletes 'bar'
|
|
2045 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2046 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2047 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2048 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
2049 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2050 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2051 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
2052 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], # merge the rename |
|
2053 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
2054 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['E-id'], |
|
2055 |
[('unversion', 'foo-id')]) |
|
2056 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2057 |
wt, conflicts = self.do_merge(builder, 'F-id') |
|
2058 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2059 |
self.assertRaises(errors.NoSuchId, wt.id2path, 'foo-id') |
|
2060 |
||
2061 |
def test_executable_changes(self): |
|
2062 |
# A Path at 'foo'
|
|
2063 |
# / \
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
2064 |
# B C
|
3514.4.22
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle executable bit changes as well. |
2065 |
# |\ /|
|
2066 |
# | X |
|
|
2067 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2068 |
# D E
|
|
2069 |
# |
|
|
2070 |
# F Executable bit changed
|
|
2071 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2072 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2073 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2074 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
2075 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2076 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2077 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2078 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
2079 |
# Have to use a real WT, because BranchBuilder doesn't support exec bit
|
|
2080 |
wt = self.get_wt_from_builder(builder) |
|
2081 |
tt = transform.TreeTransform(wt) |
|
2082 |
try: |
|
2083 |
tt.set_executability(True, tt.trans_id_tree_file_id('foo-id')) |
|
2084 |
tt.apply() |
|
2085 |
except: |
|
2086 |
tt.finalize() |
|
2087 |
raise
|
|
2088 |
self.assertTrue(wt.is_executable('foo-id')) |
|
2089 |
wt.commit('F-id', rev_id='F-id') |
|
2090 |
# Reset to D, so that we can merge F
|
|
2091 |
wt.set_parent_ids(['D-id']) |
|
2092 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(3, 'D-id') |
|
2093 |
wt.revert() |
|
2094 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_executable('foo-id')) |
|
2095 |
conflicts = wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='F-id') |
|
2096 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2097 |
self.assertTrue(wt.is_executable('foo-id')) |
|
2098 |
||
3514.4.27
by John Arbash Meinel
A couple of symlink tests, we need to do more. |
2099 |
def test_create_symlink(self): |
2100 |
self.requireFeature(tests.SymlinkFeature) |
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
2101 |
# A
|
3514.4.27
by John Arbash Meinel
A couple of symlink tests, we need to do more. |
2102 |
# / \
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
2103 |
# B C
|
3514.4.27
by John Arbash Meinel
A couple of symlink tests, we need to do more. |
2104 |
# |\ /|
|
2105 |
# | X |
|
|
2106 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2107 |
# D E
|
|
2108 |
# |
|
|
2109 |
# F Add a symlink 'foo' => 'bar'
|
|
2110 |
# Have to use a real WT, because BranchBuilder and MemoryTree don't
|
|
2111 |
# have symlink support
|
|
2112 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2113 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2114 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None))]) |
|
2115 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2116 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2117 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2118 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
2119 |
# Have to use a real WT, because BranchBuilder doesn't support exec bit
|
|
2120 |
wt = self.get_wt_from_builder(builder) |
|
2121 |
os.symlink('bar', 'path/foo') |
|
2122 |
wt.add(['foo'], ['foo-id']) |
|
2123 |
self.assertEqual('bar', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2124 |
wt.commit('add symlink', rev_id='F-id') |
|
2125 |
# Reset to D, so that we can merge F
|
|
2126 |
wt.set_parent_ids(['D-id']) |
|
2127 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(3, 'D-id') |
|
2128 |
wt.revert() |
|
2129 |
self.assertIs(None, wt.path2id('foo')) |
|
2130 |
conflicts = wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='F-id') |
|
2131 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2132 |
self.assertEqual('foo-id', wt.path2id('foo')) |
|
2133 |
self.assertEqual('bar', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2134 |
||
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2135 |
def test_both_sides_revert(self): |
2136 |
# Both sides of a criss-cross revert the text to the lca
|
|
2137 |
# A base, introduces 'foo'
|
|
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
2138 |
# |\
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2139 |
# B C B modifies 'foo', C modifies 'foo'
|
2140 |
# |X|
|
|
2141 |
# D E D reverts to B, E reverts to C
|
|
2142 |
# This should conflict
|
|
2143 |
# This must be done with a real WorkingTree, because normally their
|
|
2144 |
# inventory contains "None" rather than a real sha1
|
|
2145 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2146 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2147 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2148 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'A content\n'))]) |
|
2149 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2150 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
2151 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2152 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'C content\n'))]) |
|
2153 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], []) |
|
2154 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2155 |
wt, conflicts = self.do_merge(builder, 'E-id') |
|
2156 |
self.assertEqual(1, conflicts) |
|
2157 |
self.assertEqualDiff('<<<<<<< TREE\n' |
|
2158 |
'B content\n' |
|
2159 |
'=======\n' |
|
2160 |
'C content\n' |
|
2161 |
'>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE\n', |
|
2162 |
wt.get_file_text('foo-id')) |
|
2163 |
||
3514.4.28
by John Arbash Meinel
More symlink tests. |
2164 |
def test_modified_symlink(self): |
3514.4.27
by John Arbash Meinel
A couple of symlink tests, we need to do more. |
2165 |
self.requireFeature(tests.SymlinkFeature) |
2166 |
# A Create symlink foo => bar
|
|
2167 |
# / \
|
|
2168 |
# B C B relinks foo => baz
|
|
2169 |
# |\ /|
|
|
2170 |
# | X |
|
|
2171 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2172 |
# D E D & E have foo => baz
|
|
2173 |
# |
|
|
2174 |
# F F changes it to bing
|
|
2175 |
#
|
|
2176 |
# Merging D & F should result in F cleanly overriding D, because D's
|
|
3514.4.34
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle symlinks properly when objects are not RevisionTrees |
2177 |
# value actually comes from B
|
3514.4.27
by John Arbash Meinel
A couple of symlink tests, we need to do more. |
2178 |
|
2179 |
# Have to use a real WT, because BranchBuilder and MemoryTree don't
|
|
2180 |
# have symlink support
|
|
2181 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('path') |
|
2182 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2183 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2184 |
os.symlink('bar', 'path/foo') |
|
2185 |
wt.add(['foo'], ['foo-id']) |
|
2186 |
wt.commit('add symlink', rev_id='A-id') |
|
2187 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2188 |
os.symlink('baz', 'path/foo') |
|
2189 |
wt.commit('foo => baz', rev_id='B-id') |
|
2190 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2191 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2192 |
wt.revert() |
|
2193 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id') |
|
2194 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'B-id') |
|
2195 |
self.assertEqual('baz', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2196 |
wt.commit('E merges C & B', rev_id='E-id') |
|
2197 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2198 |
os.symlink('bing', 'path/foo') |
|
2199 |
wt.commit('F foo => bing', rev_id='F-id') |
|
2200 |
wt.set_last_revision('B-id') |
|
2201 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2202 |
wt.revert() |
|
2203 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'C-id') |
|
2204 |
wt.commit('D merges B & C', rev_id='D-id') |
|
2205 |
conflicts = wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='F-id') |
|
3948.1.7
by Vincent Ladeuil
Slight refactoring and test fixing. |
2206 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
3514.4.27
by John Arbash Meinel
A couple of symlink tests, we need to do more. |
2207 |
self.assertEqual('bing', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
2208 |
||
3514.4.28
by John Arbash Meinel
More symlink tests. |
2209 |
def test_renamed_symlink(self): |
2210 |
self.requireFeature(tests.SymlinkFeature) |
|
2211 |
# A Create symlink foo => bar
|
|
2212 |
# / \
|
|
2213 |
# B C B renames foo => barry
|
|
2214 |
# |\ /|
|
|
2215 |
# | X |
|
|
2216 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2217 |
# D E D & E have barry
|
|
2218 |
# |
|
|
2219 |
# F F renames barry to blah
|
|
2220 |
#
|
|
2221 |
# Merging D & F should result in F cleanly overriding D, because D's
|
|
3514.4.34
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle symlinks properly when objects are not RevisionTrees |
2222 |
# value actually comes from B
|
3514.4.28
by John Arbash Meinel
More symlink tests. |
2223 |
|
2224 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('path') |
|
2225 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2226 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2227 |
os.symlink('bar', 'path/foo') |
|
2228 |
wt.add(['foo'], ['foo-id']) |
|
2229 |
wt.commit('A add symlink', rev_id='A-id') |
|
2230 |
wt.rename_one('foo', 'barry') |
|
2231 |
wt.commit('B foo => barry', rev_id='B-id') |
|
2232 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2233 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2234 |
wt.revert() |
|
2235 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id') |
|
2236 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'B-id') |
|
2237 |
self.assertEqual('barry', wt.id2path('foo-id')) |
|
2238 |
self.assertEqual('bar', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2239 |
wt.commit('E merges C & B', rev_id='E-id') |
|
2240 |
wt.rename_one('barry', 'blah') |
|
2241 |
wt.commit('F barry => blah', rev_id='F-id') |
|
2242 |
wt.set_last_revision('B-id') |
|
2243 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2244 |
wt.revert() |
|
2245 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'C-id') |
|
2246 |
wt.commit('D merges B & C', rev_id='D-id') |
|
2247 |
self.assertEqual('barry', wt.id2path('foo-id')) |
|
2248 |
# Check the output of the Merger object directly
|
|
2249 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
2250 |
wt, 'F-id') |
|
2251 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
2252 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
2253 |
root_id = wt.path2id('') |
|
2254 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2255 |
# No content change, just a path change
|
|
2256 |
self.assertEqual([('foo-id', False, |
|
2257 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
2258 |
((u'foo', [u'barry', u'foo']), u'blah', u'barry'), |
|
2259 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
2260 |
], entries) |
|
2261 |
conflicts = wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='F-id') |
|
2262 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2263 |
self.assertEqual('blah', wt.id2path('foo-id')) |
|
2264 |
||
2265 |
def test_symlink_no_content_change(self): |
|
2266 |
self.requireFeature(tests.SymlinkFeature) |
|
2267 |
# A Create symlink foo => bar
|
|
2268 |
# / \
|
|
2269 |
# B C B relinks foo => baz
|
|
2270 |
# |\ /|
|
|
2271 |
# | X |
|
|
2272 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2273 |
# D E D & E have foo => baz
|
|
2274 |
# |
|
|
2275 |
# F F has foo => bing
|
|
2276 |
#
|
|
2277 |
# Merging E into F should not cause a conflict, because E doesn't have
|
|
2278 |
# a content change relative to the LCAs (it does relative to A)
|
|
2279 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('path') |
|
2280 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2281 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2282 |
os.symlink('bar', 'path/foo') |
|
2283 |
wt.add(['foo'], ['foo-id']) |
|
2284 |
wt.commit('add symlink', rev_id='A-id') |
|
2285 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2286 |
os.symlink('baz', 'path/foo') |
|
2287 |
wt.commit('foo => baz', rev_id='B-id') |
|
2288 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2289 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2290 |
wt.revert() |
|
2291 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id') |
|
2292 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'B-id') |
|
2293 |
self.assertEqual('baz', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2294 |
wt.commit('E merges C & B', rev_id='E-id') |
|
2295 |
wt.set_last_revision('B-id') |
|
2296 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2297 |
wt.revert() |
|
2298 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'C-id') |
|
2299 |
wt.commit('D merges B & C', rev_id='D-id') |
|
2300 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2301 |
os.symlink('bing', 'path/foo') |
|
2302 |
wt.commit('F foo => bing', rev_id='F-id') |
|
2303 |
||
2304 |
# Check the output of the Merger object directly
|
|
2305 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
2306 |
wt, 'E-id') |
|
2307 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
2308 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
2309 |
# Nothing interesting happened in OTHER relative to BASE
|
|
2310 |
self.assertEqual([], list(merge_obj._entries_lca())) |
|
2311 |
# Now do a real merge, just to test the rest of the stack
|
|
2312 |
conflicts = wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='E-id') |
|
2313 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2314 |
self.assertEqual('bing', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2315 |
||
3514.4.35
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test that we only call get_symlink_target if the object should be a symlink. |
2316 |
def test_symlink_this_changed_kind(self): |
2317 |
self.requireFeature(tests.SymlinkFeature) |
|
2318 |
# A Nothing
|
|
2319 |
# / \
|
|
2320 |
# B C B creates symlink foo => bar
|
|
2321 |
# |\ /|
|
|
2322 |
# | X |
|
|
2323 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2324 |
# D E D changes foo into a file, E has foo => bing
|
|
2325 |
#
|
|
2326 |
# Mostly, this is trying to test that we don't try to os.readlink() on
|
|
2327 |
# a file, or when there is nothing there
|
|
2328 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('path') |
|
2329 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2330 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2331 |
wt.commit('base', rev_id='A-id') |
|
2332 |
os.symlink('bar', 'path/foo') |
|
2333 |
wt.add(['foo'], ['foo-id']) |
|
2334 |
wt.commit('add symlink foo => bar', rev_id='B-id') |
|
2335 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2336 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2337 |
wt.revert() |
|
2338 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id') |
|
2339 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'B-id') |
|
2340 |
self.assertEqual('bar', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2341 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2342 |
# We have to change the link in E, or it won't try to do a comparison
|
|
2343 |
os.symlink('bing', 'path/foo') |
|
2344 |
wt.commit('E merges C & B, overrides to bing', rev_id='E-id') |
|
2345 |
wt.set_last_revision('B-id') |
|
2346 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2347 |
wt.revert() |
|
2348 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'C-id') |
|
2349 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2350 |
self.build_tree_contents([('path/foo', 'file content\n')]) |
|
2351 |
# XXX: workaround, WT doesn't detect kind changes unless you do
|
|
2352 |
# iter_changes()
|
|
2353 |
list(wt.iter_changes(wt.basis_tree())) |
|
2354 |
wt.commit('D merges B & C, makes it a file', rev_id='D-id') |
|
2355 |
||
2356 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
2357 |
wt, 'E-id') |
|
2358 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
2359 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
2360 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2361 |
root_id = wt.path2id('') |
|
2362 |
self.assertEqual([('foo-id', True, |
|
2363 |
((None, [root_id, None]), root_id, root_id), |
|
2364 |
((None, [u'foo', None]), u'foo', u'foo'), |
|
2365 |
((None, [False, None]), False, False)), |
|
2366 |
], entries) |
|
2367 |
||
3514.4.34
by John Arbash Meinel
Handle symlinks properly when objects are not RevisionTrees |
2368 |
def test_symlink_all_wt(self): |
2369 |
"""Check behavior if all trees are Working Trees."""
|
|
2370 |
self.requireFeature(tests.SymlinkFeature) |
|
2371 |
# The big issue is that entry.symlink_target is None for WorkingTrees.
|
|
2372 |
# So we need to make sure we handle that case correctly.
|
|
2373 |
# A foo => bar
|
|
2374 |
# |\
|
|
2375 |
# B C B relinks foo => baz
|
|
2376 |
# |X|
|
|
2377 |
# D E D & E have foo => baz
|
|
2378 |
# |
|
|
2379 |
# F F changes it to bing
|
|
2380 |
# Merging D & F should result in F cleanly overriding D, because D's
|
|
2381 |
# value actually comes from B
|
|
2382 |
||
2383 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('path') |
|
2384 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2385 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2386 |
os.symlink('bar', 'path/foo') |
|
2387 |
wt.add(['foo'], ['foo-id']) |
|
2388 |
wt.commit('add symlink', rev_id='A-id') |
|
2389 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2390 |
os.symlink('baz', 'path/foo') |
|
2391 |
wt.commit('foo => baz', rev_id='B-id') |
|
2392 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2393 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2394 |
wt.revert() |
|
2395 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id') |
|
2396 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'B-id') |
|
2397 |
self.assertEqual('baz', wt.get_symlink_target('foo-id')) |
|
2398 |
wt.commit('E merges C & B', rev_id='E-id') |
|
2399 |
os.remove('path/foo') |
|
2400 |
os.symlink('bing', 'path/foo') |
|
2401 |
wt.commit('F foo => bing', rev_id='F-id') |
|
2402 |
wt.set_last_revision('B-id') |
|
2403 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2404 |
wt.revert() |
|
2405 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, 'C-id') |
|
2406 |
wt.commit('D merges B & C', rev_id='D-id') |
|
2407 |
wt_base = wt.bzrdir.sprout('base', 'A-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2408 |
wt_base.lock_read() |
|
2409 |
self.addCleanup(wt_base.unlock) |
|
2410 |
wt_lca1 = wt.bzrdir.sprout('b-tree', 'B-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2411 |
wt_lca1.lock_read() |
|
2412 |
self.addCleanup(wt_lca1.unlock) |
|
2413 |
wt_lca2 = wt.bzrdir.sprout('c-tree', 'C-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2414 |
wt_lca2.lock_read() |
|
2415 |
self.addCleanup(wt_lca2.unlock) |
|
2416 |
wt_other = wt.bzrdir.sprout('other', 'F-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2417 |
wt_other.lock_read() |
|
2418 |
self.addCleanup(wt_other.unlock) |
|
2419 |
merge_obj = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger(wt, wt, wt_base, |
|
2420 |
wt_other, lca_trees=[wt_lca1, wt_lca2], do_merge=False) |
|
2421 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2422 |
root_id = wt.path2id('') |
|
2423 |
self.assertEqual([('foo-id', True, |
|
2424 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
2425 |
((u'foo', [u'foo', u'foo']), u'foo', u'foo'), |
|
2426 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
2427 |
], entries) |
|
2428 |
||
3514.4.25
by John Arbash Meinel
A few more merge-level behavior tests. |
2429 |
def test_other_reverted_path_to_base(self): |
2430 |
# A Path at 'foo'
|
|
2431 |
# / \
|
|
2432 |
# B C Path at 'bar' in B
|
|
2433 |
# |\ /|
|
|
2434 |
# | X |
|
|
2435 |
# |/ \|
|
|
2436 |
# D E Path at 'bar'
|
|
2437 |
# |
|
|
2438 |
# F Path at 'foo'
|
|
2439 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2440 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2441 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2442 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'a\nb\nc\n'))]) |
|
2443 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2444 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2445 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) |
|
2446 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
2447 |
[('rename', ('foo', 'bar'))]) # merge the rename |
|
2448 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['E-id'], |
|
2449 |
[('rename', ('bar', 'foo'))]) # Rename back to BASE |
|
2450 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2451 |
wt, conflicts = self.do_merge(builder, 'F-id') |
|
2452 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2453 |
self.assertEqual('foo', wt.id2path('foo-id')) |
|
2454 |
||
2455 |
def test_other_reverted_content_to_base(self): |
|
2456 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2457 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2458 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2459 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'base content\n'))]) |
|
2460 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2461 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2462 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
2463 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
2464 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) # merge the content |
|
2465 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['E-id'], |
|
2466 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'base content\n'))]) # Revert back to BASE |
|
2467 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2468 |
wt, conflicts = self.do_merge(builder, 'F-id') |
|
2469 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2470 |
# TODO: We need to use the per-file graph to properly select a BASE
|
|
3514.4.26
by John Arbash Meinel
Clean up comments, only symlink support left. |
2471 |
# before this will work. Or at least use the LCA trees to find
|
2472 |
# the appropriate content base. (which is B, not A).
|
|
3955.2.1
by John Arbash Meinel
Change the workings of merge_content to be lca aware. |
2473 |
self.assertEqual('base content\n', wt.get_file_text('foo-id')) |
3514.4.25
by John Arbash Meinel
A few more merge-level behavior tests. |
2474 |
|
3514.4.28
by John Arbash Meinel
More symlink tests. |
2475 |
def test_other_modified_content(self): |
2476 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2477 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2478 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2479 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'base content\n'))]) |
|
2480 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], []) |
|
2481 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2482 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
2483 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
2484 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) # merge the content |
|
2485 |
builder.build_snapshot('F-id', ['E-id'], |
|
2486 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'F content\n'))]) # Override B content |
|
2487 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], []) |
|
2488 |
wt, conflicts = self.do_merge(builder, 'F-id') |
|
2489 |
self.assertEqual(0, conflicts) |
|
2490 |
self.assertEqual('F content\n', wt.get_file_text('foo-id')) |
|
2491 |
||
3514.4.32
by John Arbash Meinel
Add a test for proper behavior when *everything* is a WT. |
2492 |
def test_all_wt(self): |
2493 |
"""Check behavior if all trees are Working Trees."""
|
|
2494 |
# The big issue is that entry.revision is None for WorkingTrees. (as is
|
|
2495 |
# entry.text_sha1, etc. So we need to make sure we handle that case
|
|
2496 |
# correctly.
|
|
2497 |
# A Content of 'foo', path of 'a'
|
|
2498 |
# |\
|
|
2499 |
# B C B modifies content, C renames 'a' => 'b'
|
|
2500 |
# |X|
|
|
2501 |
# D E E updates content, renames 'b' => 'c'
|
|
2502 |
builder = self.get_builder() |
|
2503 |
builder.build_snapshot('A-id', None, |
|
2504 |
[('add', (u'', 'a-root-id', 'directory', None)), |
|
2505 |
('add', (u'a', 'a-id', 'file', 'base content\n')), |
|
2506 |
('add', (u'foo', 'foo-id', 'file', 'base content\n'))]) |
|
2507 |
builder.build_snapshot('B-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2508 |
[('modify', ('foo-id', 'B content\n'))]) |
|
2509 |
builder.build_snapshot('C-id', ['A-id'], |
|
2510 |
[('rename', ('a', 'b'))]) |
|
2511 |
builder.build_snapshot('E-id', ['C-id', 'B-id'], |
|
2512 |
[('rename', ('b', 'c')), |
|
2513 |
('modify', ('foo-id', 'E content\n'))]) |
|
2514 |
builder.build_snapshot('D-id', ['B-id', 'C-id'], |
|
2515 |
[('rename', ('a', 'b'))]) # merged change |
|
2516 |
wt_this = self.get_wt_from_builder(builder) |
|
2517 |
wt_base = wt_this.bzrdir.sprout('base', 'A-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2518 |
wt_base.lock_read() |
|
2519 |
self.addCleanup(wt_base.unlock) |
|
2520 |
wt_lca1 = wt_this.bzrdir.sprout('b-tree', 'B-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2521 |
wt_lca1.lock_read() |
|
2522 |
self.addCleanup(wt_lca1.unlock) |
|
2523 |
wt_lca2 = wt_this.bzrdir.sprout('c-tree', 'C-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2524 |
wt_lca2.lock_read() |
|
2525 |
self.addCleanup(wt_lca2.unlock) |
|
2526 |
wt_other = wt_this.bzrdir.sprout('other', 'E-id').open_workingtree() |
|
2527 |
wt_other.lock_read() |
|
2528 |
self.addCleanup(wt_other.unlock) |
|
2529 |
merge_obj = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger(wt_this, wt_this, wt_base, |
|
2530 |
wt_other, lca_trees=[wt_lca1, wt_lca2], do_merge=False) |
|
2531 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2532 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
2533 |
self.assertEqual([('a-id', False, |
|
2534 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
2535 |
((u'a', [u'a', u'b']), u'c', u'b'), |
|
2536 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
2537 |
('foo-id', True, |
|
2538 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
2539 |
((u'foo', [u'foo', u'foo']), u'foo', u'foo'), |
|
2540 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
2541 |
], entries) |
|
2542 |
||
3514.4.33
by John Arbash Meinel
Implement support for 'tree-reference'. |
2543 |
def test_nested_tree_unmodified(self): |
2544 |
# Tested with a real WT, because BranchBuilder/MemoryTree don't handle
|
|
2545 |
# 'tree-reference'
|
|
2546 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree', |
|
2547 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2548 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2549 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2550 |
sub_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree/sub-tree', |
|
2551 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2552 |
wt.set_root_id('a-root-id') |
|
2553 |
sub_tree.set_root_id('sub-tree-root') |
|
2554 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree/sub-tree/file', 'text1')]) |
|
2555 |
sub_tree.add('file') |
|
2556 |
sub_tree.commit('foo', rev_id='sub-A-id') |
|
2557 |
wt.add_reference(sub_tree) |
|
2558 |
wt.commit('set text to 1', rev_id='A-id', recursive=None) |
|
2559 |
# Now create a criss-cross merge in the parent, without modifying the
|
|
2560 |
# subtree
|
|
2561 |
wt.commit('B', rev_id='B-id', recursive=None) |
|
2562 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2563 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2564 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id', recursive=None) |
|
2565 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='B-id') |
|
2566 |
wt.commit('E', rev_id='E-id', recursive=None) |
|
2567 |
wt.set_parent_ids(['B-id', 'C-id']) |
|
2568 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2569 |
wt.commit('D', rev_id='D-id', recursive=None) |
|
2570 |
||
2571 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
2572 |
wt, 'E-id') |
|
2573 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
2574 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
2575 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2576 |
self.assertEqual([], entries) |
|
2577 |
||
2578 |
def test_nested_tree_subtree_modified(self): |
|
2579 |
# Tested with a real WT, because BranchBuilder/MemoryTree don't handle
|
|
2580 |
# 'tree-reference'
|
|
2581 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree', |
|
2582 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2583 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2584 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2585 |
sub_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree/sub', |
|
2586 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2587 |
wt.set_root_id('a-root-id') |
|
2588 |
sub_tree.set_root_id('sub-tree-root') |
|
2589 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree/sub/file', 'text1')]) |
|
2590 |
sub_tree.add('file') |
|
2591 |
sub_tree.commit('foo', rev_id='sub-A-id') |
|
2592 |
wt.add_reference(sub_tree) |
|
2593 |
wt.commit('set text to 1', rev_id='A-id', recursive=None) |
|
2594 |
# Now create a criss-cross merge in the parent, without modifying the
|
|
2595 |
# subtree
|
|
2596 |
wt.commit('B', rev_id='B-id', recursive=None) |
|
2597 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2598 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2599 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id', recursive=None) |
|
2600 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='B-id') |
|
2601 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree/sub/file', 'text2')]) |
|
2602 |
sub_tree.commit('modify contents', rev_id='sub-B-id') |
|
2603 |
wt.commit('E', rev_id='E-id', recursive=None) |
|
2604 |
wt.set_parent_ids(['B-id', 'C-id']) |
|
2605 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2606 |
wt.commit('D', rev_id='D-id', recursive=None) |
|
2607 |
||
2608 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
2609 |
wt, 'E-id') |
|
2610 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
2611 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
2612 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2613 |
# Nothing interesting about this sub-tree, because content changes are
|
|
2614 |
# computed at a higher level
|
|
2615 |
self.assertEqual([], entries) |
|
2616 |
||
2617 |
def test_nested_tree_subtree_renamed(self): |
|
2618 |
# Tested with a real WT, because BranchBuilder/MemoryTree don't handle
|
|
2619 |
# 'tree-reference'
|
|
2620 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree', |
|
2621 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2622 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2623 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2624 |
sub_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree/sub', |
|
2625 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2626 |
wt.set_root_id('a-root-id') |
|
2627 |
sub_tree.set_root_id('sub-tree-root') |
|
2628 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree/sub/file', 'text1')]) |
|
2629 |
sub_tree.add('file') |
|
2630 |
sub_tree.commit('foo', rev_id='sub-A-id') |
|
2631 |
wt.add_reference(sub_tree) |
|
2632 |
wt.commit('set text to 1', rev_id='A-id', recursive=None) |
|
2633 |
# Now create a criss-cross merge in the parent, without modifying the
|
|
2634 |
# subtree
|
|
2635 |
wt.commit('B', rev_id='B-id', recursive=None) |
|
2636 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2637 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2638 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id', recursive=None) |
|
2639 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='B-id') |
|
2640 |
wt.rename_one('sub', 'alt_sub') |
|
2641 |
wt.commit('E', rev_id='E-id', recursive=None) |
|
2642 |
wt.set_last_revision('B-id') |
|
2643 |
wt.revert() |
|
2644 |
wt.set_parent_ids(['B-id', 'C-id']) |
|
2645 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2646 |
wt.commit('D', rev_id='D-id', recursive=None) |
|
2647 |
||
2648 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
2649 |
wt, 'E-id') |
|
2650 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
2651 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
2652 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2653 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
2654 |
self.assertEqual([('sub-tree-root', False, |
|
2655 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
2656 |
((u'sub', [u'sub', u'sub']), u'alt_sub', u'sub'), |
|
2657 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
2658 |
], entries) |
|
2659 |
||
2660 |
def test_nested_tree_subtree_renamed_and_modified(self): |
|
2661 |
# Tested with a real WT, because BranchBuilder/MemoryTree don't handle
|
|
2662 |
# 'tree-reference'
|
|
2663 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree', |
|
2664 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2665 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
2666 |
self.addCleanup(wt.unlock) |
|
2667 |
sub_tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree/sub', |
|
2668 |
format='dirstate-with-subtree') |
|
2669 |
wt.set_root_id('a-root-id') |
|
2670 |
sub_tree.set_root_id('sub-tree-root') |
|
2671 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree/sub/file', 'text1')]) |
|
2672 |
sub_tree.add('file') |
|
2673 |
sub_tree.commit('foo', rev_id='sub-A-id') |
|
2674 |
wt.add_reference(sub_tree) |
|
2675 |
wt.commit('set text to 1', rev_id='A-id', recursive=None) |
|
2676 |
# Now create a criss-cross merge in the parent, without modifying the
|
|
2677 |
# subtree
|
|
2678 |
wt.commit('B', rev_id='B-id', recursive=None) |
|
2679 |
wt.set_last_revision('A-id') |
|
2680 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(1, 'A-id') |
|
2681 |
wt.commit('C', rev_id='C-id', recursive=None) |
|
2682 |
wt.merge_from_branch(wt.branch, to_revision='B-id') |
|
2683 |
self.build_tree_contents([('tree/sub/file', 'text2')]) |
|
2684 |
sub_tree.commit('modify contents', rev_id='sub-B-id') |
|
2685 |
wt.rename_one('sub', 'alt_sub') |
|
2686 |
wt.commit('E', rev_id='E-id', recursive=None) |
|
2687 |
wt.set_last_revision('B-id') |
|
2688 |
wt.revert() |
|
2689 |
wt.set_parent_ids(['B-id', 'C-id']) |
|
2690 |
wt.branch.set_last_revision_info(2, 'B-id') |
|
2691 |
wt.commit('D', rev_id='D-id', recursive=None) |
|
2692 |
||
2693 |
merger = _mod_merge.Merger.from_revision_ids(progress.DummyProgress(), |
|
2694 |
wt, 'E-id') |
|
2695 |
merger.merge_type = _mod_merge.Merge3Merger |
|
2696 |
merge_obj = merger.make_merger() |
|
2697 |
entries = list(merge_obj._entries_lca()) |
|
2698 |
root_id = 'a-root-id' |
|
2699 |
self.assertEqual([('sub-tree-root', False, |
|
2700 |
((root_id, [root_id, root_id]), root_id, root_id), |
|
2701 |
((u'sub', [u'sub', u'sub']), u'alt_sub', u'sub'), |
|
2702 |
((False, [False, False]), False, False)), |
|
2703 |
], entries) |
|
2704 |
||
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2705 |
|
2706 |
class TestLCAMultiWay(tests.TestCase): |
|
2707 |
||
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2708 |
def assertLCAMultiWay(self, expected, base, lcas, other, this, |
2709 |
allow_overriding_lca=True): |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2710 |
self.assertEqual(expected, _mod_merge.Merge3Merger._lca_multi_way( |
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2711 |
(base, lcas), other, this, |
2712 |
allow_overriding_lca=allow_overriding_lca)) |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2713 |
|
2714 |
def test_other_equal_equal_lcas(self): |
|
2715 |
"""Test when OTHER=LCA and all LCAs are identical."""
|
|
2716 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2717 |
'bval', ['bval', 'bval'], 'bval', 'bval') |
|
2718 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2719 |
'bval', ['lcaval', 'lcaval'], 'lcaval', 'bval') |
|
2720 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2721 |
'bval', ['lcaval', 'lcaval', 'lcaval'], 'lcaval', 'bval') |
|
2722 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2723 |
'bval', ['lcaval', 'lcaval', 'lcaval'], 'lcaval', 'tval') |
|
2724 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2725 |
'bval', ['lcaval', 'lcaval', 'lcaval'], 'lcaval', None) |
|
2726 |
||
2727 |
def test_other_equal_this(self): |
|
2728 |
"""Test when other and this are identical."""
|
|
2729 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2730 |
'bval', ['bval', 'bval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2731 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2732 |
'bval', ['lcaval', 'lcaval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2733 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2734 |
'bval', ['cval', 'dval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2735 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2736 |
'bval', [None, 'lcaval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2737 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2738 |
None, [None, 'lcaval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2739 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2740 |
None, ['lcaval', 'lcaval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2741 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2742 |
None, ['cval', 'dval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2743 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2744 |
None, ['cval', 'dval'], None, None) |
|
2745 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2746 |
None, ['cval', 'dval', 'eval', 'fval'], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2747 |
||
2748 |
def test_no_lcas(self): |
|
2749 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2750 |
'bval', [], 'bval', 'tval') |
|
2751 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('other', |
|
2752 |
'bval', [], 'oval', 'bval') |
|
2753 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2754 |
'bval', [], 'oval', 'tval') |
|
2755 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2756 |
'bval', [], 'oval', 'oval') |
|
2757 |
||
2758 |
def test_lca_supersedes_other_lca(self): |
|
2759 |
"""If one lca == base, the other lca takes precedence"""
|
|
2760 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2761 |
'bval', ['bval', 'lcaval'], 'lcaval', 'tval') |
|
2762 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2763 |
'bval', ['bval', 'lcaval'], 'lcaval', 'bval') |
|
2764 |
# This is actually considered a 'revert' because the 'lcaval' in LCAS
|
|
2765 |
# supersedes the BASE val (in the other LCA) but then OTHER reverts it
|
|
2766 |
# back to bval.
|
|
2767 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('other', |
|
2768 |
'bval', ['bval', 'lcaval'], 'bval', 'lcaval') |
|
2769 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2770 |
'bval', ['bval', 'lcaval'], 'bval', 'tval') |
|
2771 |
||
2772 |
def test_other_and_this_pick_different_lca(self): |
|
2773 |
# OTHER and THIS resolve the lca conflict in different ways
|
|
2774 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2775 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'lca1val', 'lca2val') |
|
2776 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2777 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'lca1val', 'lca2val') |
|
2778 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2779 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'bval'], 'lca1val', 'lca2val') |
|
2780 |
||
2781 |
def test_other_in_lca(self): |
|
2782 |
# OTHER takes a value of one of the LCAs, THIS takes a new value, which
|
|
2783 |
# theoretically supersedes both LCA values and 'wins'
|
|
2784 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2785 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'lca1val', 'newval') |
|
2786 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2787 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'lca1val', 'newval') |
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2788 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
2789 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'lca1val', 'newval', |
|
2790 |
allow_overriding_lca=False) |
|
2791 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2792 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'lca1val', 'newval', |
|
2793 |
allow_overriding_lca=False) |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2794 |
# THIS reverted back to BASE, but that is an explicit supersede of all
|
2795 |
# LCAs
|
|
2796 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2797 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'lca1val', 'bval') |
|
2798 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('this', |
|
2799 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'bval'], 'lca1val', 'bval') |
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2800 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
2801 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'lca1val', 'bval', |
|
2802 |
allow_overriding_lca=False) |
|
2803 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2804 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'bval'], 'lca1val', 'bval', |
|
2805 |
allow_overriding_lca=False) |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2806 |
|
2807 |
def test_this_in_lca(self): |
|
2808 |
# THIS takes a value of one of the LCAs, OTHER takes a new value, which
|
|
2809 |
# theoretically supersedes both LCA values and 'wins'
|
|
2810 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('other', |
|
2811 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'oval', 'lca1val') |
|
2812 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('other', |
|
2813 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'oval', 'lca2val') |
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2814 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
2815 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'oval', 'lca1val', |
|
2816 |
allow_overriding_lca=False) |
|
2817 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2818 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'oval', 'lca2val', |
|
2819 |
allow_overriding_lca=False) |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2820 |
# OTHER reverted back to BASE, but that is an explicit supersede of all
|
2821 |
# LCAs
|
|
2822 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('other', |
|
2823 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'bval', 'lca3val') |
|
3514.4.30
by John Arbash Meinel
Several updates. |
2824 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
2825 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'bval', 'lca3val', |
|
2826 |
allow_overriding_lca=False) |
|
3514.4.21
by John Arbash Meinel
Hook up the lca-way logic into the path handlers. |
2827 |
|
2828 |
def test_all_differ(self): |
|
2829 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2830 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val'], 'oval', 'tval') |
|
2831 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2832 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca2val'], 'oval', 'tval') |
|
2833 |
self.assertLCAMultiWay('conflict', |
|
2834 |
'bval', ['lca1val', 'lca2val', 'lca3val'], 'oval', 'tval') |