~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev

321 by Martin Pool
doc: revfile storage and related things
1
********
2
Revfiles
3
********
4
5
The unit for compressed storage in bzr is a *revfile*, whose design
6
was suggested by Matt Mackall.
7
8
9
Requirements
10
============
11
12
Compressed storage is a tradeoff between several goals:
13
14
* Reasonably compact storage of long histories.
15
16
* Robustness and simplicity.
17
18
* Fast extraction of versions and addition of new versions (preferably
19
  without rewriting the whole file, or reading the whole history.)
20
21
* Fast and precise annotations.
22
23
* Storage of files of at least a few hundred MB.
24
25
26
Design
27
======
28
29
revfiles store the history of a single logical file, which is
30
identified in bzr by its file-id.  In this sense they are similar to
31
an RCS or CVS ``,v`` file or an SCCS sfile.
32
33
Each state of the file is called a *text*. 
34
35
Renaming, adding and deleting this file is handled at a higher level
36
by the inventory system, and is outside the scope of the revfile.  The
37
revfile name is typically based on the file id which is itself
38
typically based on the name the file had when it was first added.  But
39
this is purely cosmetic.
40
41
    For example a file now called ``frob.c`` may have the id
42
    ``frobber.c-12873`` because it was originally called
43
    ``frobber.c``.  Its texts are kept in the revfile
44
    ``.bzr/revfiles/frobber.c-12873.revs``.
45
46
When the file is deleted from the inventory the revfile does not
47
change.  It's just not used in reproducing trees from that point
48
onwards.
49
50
The revfile does not record the date when the text was added, a commit
51
message, properties, or any other metadata.  That is handled in the
52
higher-level revision history.
53
54
Inventories and other metadata files that vary from one version to the
55
next can themselves be stored in revfiles.
56
57
revfiles store files as simple byte streams, with no consideration of
58
translating character sets, line endings, or keywords.  Those are also
59
handled at a higher level.  However, the revfile may make use of
60
knowledge that a file is line-based in generating a diff.  
61
62
   (The Python builtin difflib is too slow when generating a purely
63
   byte-by-byte delta so we always make a line-by-line diff; when this
64
   is fixed it may be feasible to use line-by-line diffs for all
65
   files.)
66
67
Files whose text does not change from one revision to the next are
68
stored as just a single text in the revfile.  This can happen even if
69
the file was renamed or other properties were changed in the
325 by Martin Pool
- more revfile design notes
70
inventory.
71
72
The revfile is held on disk as two files: an *index* and a *data*
73
file.  The index file is short and always read completely into memory;
74
the data file is much longer and only the relevant bits of it,
75
identified by the index file, need to be read.
76
77
  In previous versions, the  index file identified texts by their
78
  SHA-1 digest.  This was unsatisfying for two reasons.  Firstly it
79
  assumes that SHA-1 will not collide, which is not an assumption we
80
  wish to make in long-lived files.  Secondly for annotations we need
81
  to be able to map from file versions back to a revision.
82
83
Texts are identified by the name of the revfile and a UUID
84
corresponding to the first revision in which they were first
85
introduced.  This means that given a text we can identify which
86
revision it belongs to, and annotations can use the index within the
87
revfile to identify where a region was first introduced.
88
89
  We cannot identify texts by the integer revision number, because
90
  that would limit us to only referring to a file in a particular
91
  branch.
92
93
  I'd like to just use the revision-id, but those are variable-length
94
  strings, and I'd like the revfile index to be fixed-length and
95
  relatively short.  UUIDs can be encoded in binary as only 16 bytes.
96
  Perhaps we should just use UUIDs for revisions and be done?
97
98
This is meant to scale to hold 100,000 revisions of a single file, by
99
which time the index file will be ~4.8MB and a bit big to read
100
sequentially.
101
102
Some of the reserved fields could be used to implement a (semi?)
103
balanced tree indexed by SHA1 so we can much more efficiently find the
104
index associated with a particular hash.  For 100,000 revs we would be
105
able to find it in about 17 random reads, which is not too bad.
106
107
This performs pretty well except when trying to calculate deltas of
108
really large files.  For that the main thing would be to plug in
109
something faster than difflib, which is after all pure Python.
110
Another approach is to just store the gzipped full text of big files,
111
though perhaps that's too perverse?
112
113
321 by Martin Pool
doc: revfile storage and related things
114
115
116
Skip-deltas
117
-----------
118
119
Because the basis of a delta does not need to be the text's logical
325 by Martin Pool
- more revfile design notes
120
predecessor, we can adjust the deltas to avoid ever needing to apply
121
too many deltas to reproduce a particular file.  
321 by Martin Pool
doc: revfile storage and related things
122
123
124
Annotations
125
-----------
126
325 by Martin Pool
- more revfile design notes
127
Annotations indicate which revision of a file first inserted a line
128
(or region of bytes).
129
130
Given a string, we can write annotations on it like so: a sequence of
131
*(index, length)* pairs, giving the *index* of the revision which
132
introduced the next run of *length* bytes.  The sum of the lengths
133
must equal the length of the string.  For text files the regions will
134
typically fall on line breaks.  This can be transformed in memory to
135
other structures, such as a list of *(index, content)* pairs.
136
137
When a line was inserted from a merge revision then the annotation for
138
that line should still be the source in the merged branch, rather than
139
just being the revision in which the merge took place.
140
141
They can cheaply be calculated when inserting a new text, but are
142
expensive to calculate after the fact because that requires searching
143
back through all previous text and all texts which were merged in.  It
144
therefore seems sensible to calculate them once and store them.
145
146
To do this we need two operators which update an existing annotated
147
file:
148
149
A. Given an annotated file and a working text, update the annotation to
150
   mark regions inserted in the working file as new in this revision.
151
152
B. Given two annotated files, merge them to produce an annotated
153
   result.    When there are conflicts, both texts should be included
154
   and annotated.
155
156
These may be repeated: after a merge there may be another merge, or
157
there may be manual fixups or conflict resolutions.
158
159
So what we require is given a diff or a diff3 between two files, map
160
the regions of bytes changed into corresponding updates to the origin
161
annotations.
321 by Martin Pool
doc: revfile storage and related things
162
328 by Martin Pool
- more documentation of revfile+annotation
163
Annotations can also be delta-compressed; we only need to add new
164
annotation data when there is a text insertion.
165
166
    (It is possible in a merge to have a change of annotation when
167
    there is no text change, though this seems unlikely.  This can
168
    still be represented as a "pointless" delta, plus an update to the
169
    annotations.)
170
171
172
173
Tools
174
-----
175
176
The revfile module can be invoked as a program to give low-level
177
access for data recovery, debugging, etc.
178
179
180
181
Format
182
======
183
184
Index file
185
----------
186
187
The index file is a series of fixed-length records::
188
189
  byte[16]     UUID of revision
190
  byte[20]     SHA-1 of expanded text (as binary, not hex)
191
  uint32       flags: 1=zlib compressed
192
  uint32       sequence number this is based on, or -1 for full text
193
  uint32       offset in text file of start
194
  uint32       length of compressed delta in text file
195
  uint32[3]    reserved
196
197
Total 64 bytes.
198
199
The header is also 64 bytes, for tidyness and easy calculation.  For
200
this format the header must be ``bzr revfile v2\n`` padded with
201
``\xff`` to 64 bytes.
202
203
The first record after the header is index 0.  A record's base index
204
must be less than its own index.
205
206
The SHA-1 is redundant with the inventory but stored just as a check
207
on the compression methods and so that the file can be validated
208
without reference to any other information.
209
210
Each byte in the text file should be included by at most one delta.
211
212
213
Deltas
214
------
215
216
Deltas to the text are stored as a series of variable-length records::
217
218
  uint32        idx
219
  uint32        m
220
  uint32        n
221
  uint32        l
222
  byte[l]       new
223
224
This describes a change originally introduced in the revision
225
described by *idx* in the index.
226
227
This indicates that the region [m:n] of the input file should be
228
replaced by the text *new*.  If m==n this is a pure insertion of l
229
bytes.  If l==0 this is a pure deletion of (n-m) bytes.
230
231
321 by Martin Pool
doc: revfile storage and related things
232
233
Open issues
234
===========
235
236
* revfiles use unsigned 32-bit integers both in diffs and the index.
237
  This should be more than enough for any reasonable source file but
238
  perhaps not enough for large binaries that are frequently committed.
239
240
  Perhaps for those files there should be an option to continue to use
241
  the text-store.  There is unlikely to be any benefit in holding
242
  deltas between them, and deltas will anyhow be hard to calculate. 
243
244
* The append-only design does not allow for destroying committed data,
245
  as when confidential information is accidentally added.  That could
246
  be fixed by creating the fixed repository as a separate branch, into
247
  which only the preserved revisions are exported.
325 by Martin Pool
- more revfile design notes
248
249
* Should annotations also indicate where text was deleted?
250
251
* This design calls for only one annotation per line, which seems
252
  standard.  However, this is lacking in at least two cases:
253
254
  - Lines which originate in the same way in more than one revision,
255
    through being independently introduced.  In this case we would
256
    apparently have to make an arbitrary choice; I suppose branches
257
    could prefer to assume lines originated in their own history.
258
259
  - It might be useful to directly indicate which mergers included
260
    which lines.  We do have that information in the revision history
261
    though, so there seems no need to store it for every line.
328 by Martin Pool
- more documentation of revfile+annotation
262
263
* Should we also store full-texts as a transitional step?
264
265
* Storing the annotations with the text is reasonably simple and
266
  compact, but means that we always need to process the annotation
267
  structure even when we only want the text.  In particular it means
268
  that full-texts cannot just simply be copied out but rather composed
269
  from chunks.  That seems inefficient since it is probably common to
270
  only want the text.
329 by Martin Pool
- refactor command functions into command classes
271