1711.8.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Move the new locking tests into their own files, and move the helper functions into a test helper. |
1 |
# Copyright (C) 2006 Canonical Ltd
|
2 |
#
|
|
3 |
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
4 |
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
5 |
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
6 |
# (at your option) any later version.
|
|
7 |
#
|
|
8 |
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
9 |
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
10 |
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
11 |
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
12 |
#
|
|
13 |
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
14 |
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
15 |
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
|
|
16 |
||
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
17 |
"""Tests for the (un)lock interfaces on all working tree implemenations."""
|
1711.8.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Move the new locking tests into their own files, and move the helper functions into a test helper. |
18 |
|
1957.1.17
by John Arbash Meinel
Change tests that expect locking to fail to timeout sooner. |
19 |
from bzrlib import ( |
20 |
branch, |
|
21 |
errors, |
|
22 |
lockdir, |
|
23 |
)
|
|
1711.8.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Move the new locking tests into their own files, and move the helper functions into a test helper. |
24 |
from bzrlib.tests.workingtree_implementations import TestCaseWithWorkingTree |
25 |
||
26 |
||
27 |
class TestWorkingTreeLocking(TestCaseWithWorkingTree): |
|
28 |
||
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
29 |
def test_trivial_lock_read_unlock(self): |
30 |
"""Locking and unlocking should work trivially."""
|
|
1711.8.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Move the new locking tests into their own files, and move the helper functions into a test helper. |
31 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
32 |
||
33 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
34 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
35 |
wt.lock_read() |
|
36 |
try: |
|
37 |
self.assertTrue(wt.is_locked()) |
|
38 |
self.assertTrue(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
39 |
finally: |
|
40 |
wt.unlock() |
|
41 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
42 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
43 |
||
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
44 |
def test_trivial_lock_write_unlock(self): |
45 |
"""Locking for write and unlocking should work trivially."""
|
|
46 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
1711.8.5
by John Arbash Meinel
Move the new locking tests into their own files, and move the helper functions into a test helper. |
47 |
|
48 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
49 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
50 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
51 |
try: |
|
52 |
self.assertTrue(wt.is_locked()) |
|
53 |
self.assertTrue(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
54 |
finally: |
|
55 |
wt.unlock() |
|
56 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
57 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
58 |
|
1997.1.1
by Robert Collins
Add WorkingTree.lock_tree_write. |
59 |
def test_trivial_lock_tree_write_unlock(self): |
60 |
"""Locking for tree write is ok when the branch is not locked."""
|
|
61 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
62 |
||
63 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
64 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
65 |
wt.lock_tree_write() |
|
66 |
try: |
|
67 |
self.assertTrue(wt.is_locked()) |
|
68 |
self.assertTrue(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
69 |
finally: |
|
70 |
wt.unlock() |
|
71 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
72 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
73 |
||
74 |
def test_trivial_lock_tree_write_branch_read_locked(self): |
|
75 |
"""It is ok to lock_tree_write when the branch is read locked."""
|
|
76 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
77 |
||
78 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
79 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
80 |
wt.branch.lock_read() |
|
81 |
try: |
|
82 |
wt.lock_tree_write() |
|
83 |
except errors.ReadOnlyError: |
|
84 |
# When ReadOnlyError is raised, it indicates that the
|
|
85 |
# workingtree shares its lock with the branch, which is what
|
|
86 |
# the git/hg/bzr0.6 formats do.
|
|
87 |
# in this case, no lock should have been taken - but the tree
|
|
88 |
# will have been locked because they share a lock. Unlocking
|
|
89 |
# just the branch should make everything match again correctly.
|
|
90 |
wt.branch.unlock() |
|
91 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
92 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
93 |
return
|
|
94 |
try: |
|
95 |
self.assertTrue(wt.is_locked()) |
|
96 |
self.assertTrue(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
97 |
finally: |
|
98 |
wt.unlock() |
|
99 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
100 |
self.assertTrue(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
101 |
wt.branch.unlock() |
|
102 |
||
1986.5.3
by Robert Collins
New method ``WorkingTree.flush()`` which will write the current memory |
103 |
def _test_unlock_with_lock_method(self, methodname): |
104 |
"""Create a tree and then test its unlocking behaviour.
|
|
105 |
||
106 |
:param methodname: The lock method to use to establish locks.
|
|
107 |
"""
|
|
108 |
# when unlocking the last lock count from tree_write_lock,
|
|
109 |
# the tree should do a flush().
|
|
110 |
# we test that by changing the inventory using set_root_id
|
|
111 |
tree = self.make_branch_and_tree('tree') |
|
112 |
# prepare for a series of changes that will modify the
|
|
113 |
# inventory
|
|
114 |
getattr(tree, methodname)() |
|
115 |
# note that we dont have a try:finally here because of two reasons:
|
|
116 |
# firstly there will only be errors reported if the test fails, and
|
|
117 |
# when it fails thats ok as long as the test suite cleanup still works,
|
|
1986.5.7
by Robert Collins
Merge reviews. |
118 |
# which it will as the lock objects are released (thats where the
|
119 |
# warning comes from. Secondly, it is hard in this test to be
|
|
1986.5.3
by Robert Collins
New method ``WorkingTree.flush()`` which will write the current memory |
120 |
# sure that we've got the right interactions between try:finally
|
121 |
# and the lock/unlocks we are doing.
|
|
122 |
getattr(tree, methodname)() |
|
123 |
# this should really do something within the public api
|
|
124 |
# e.g. mkdir('foo') but all the mutating methods at the
|
|
125 |
# moment trigger inventory writes and thus will not
|
|
126 |
# let us trigger a read-when-dirty situation.
|
|
127 |
old_root = tree.get_root_id() |
|
128 |
tree.set_root_id('new-root') |
|
129 |
# to detect that the inventory is written by unlock, we
|
|
130 |
# first check that it was not written yet.
|
|
131 |
reference_tree = tree.bzrdir.open_workingtree() |
|
132 |
self.assertEqual(old_root, reference_tree.get_root_id()) |
|
133 |
# now unlock the second held lock, which should do nothing.
|
|
134 |
tree.unlock() |
|
135 |
reference_tree = tree.bzrdir.open_workingtree() |
|
136 |
self.assertEqual(old_root, reference_tree.get_root_id()) |
|
137 |
# unlocking the first lock we took will now flush.
|
|
138 |
tree.unlock() |
|
139 |
# and check it was written using another reference tree
|
|
140 |
reference_tree = tree.bzrdir.open_workingtree() |
|
141 |
self.assertEqual('new-root', reference_tree.get_root_id()) |
|
142 |
||
143 |
def test_unlock_from_tree_write_lock_flushes(self): |
|
144 |
self._test_unlock_with_lock_method("lock_tree_write") |
|
145 |
||
146 |
def test_unlock_from_write_lock_flushes(self): |
|
147 |
self._test_unlock_with_lock_method("lock_write") |
|
148 |
||
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
149 |
def test_unlock_branch_failures(self): |
150 |
"""If the branch unlock fails the tree must still unlock."""
|
|
151 |
# The public interface for WorkingTree requires a branch, but
|
|
152 |
# does not require that the working tree use the branch - its
|
|
153 |
# implementation specific how the WorkingTree, Branch, and Repository
|
|
154 |
# hang together.
|
|
155 |
# in order to test that implementations which *do* unlock via the branch
|
|
156 |
# do so correctly, we unlock the branch after locking the working tree.
|
|
157 |
# The next unlock on working tree should trigger a LockNotHeld exception
|
|
158 |
# from the branch object, which must be exposed to the caller. To meet
|
|
159 |
# our object model - where locking a tree locks its branch, and
|
|
160 |
# unlocking a branch does not unlock a working tree, *even* for
|
|
161 |
# all-in-one implementations like bzr 0.6, git, and hg, implementations
|
|
162 |
# must have some separate counter for each object, so our explicit
|
|
163 |
# unlock should trigger some error on all implementations, and
|
|
164 |
# requiring that to be LockNotHeld seems reasonable.
|
|
165 |
#
|
|
166 |
# we use this approach rather than decorating the Branch, because the
|
|
167 |
# public interface of WorkingTree does not permit altering the branch
|
|
168 |
# object - and we cannot tell which attribute might allow us to
|
|
169 |
# backdoor-in and change it reliably. For implementation specific tests
|
|
170 |
# we can do such skullduggery, but not for interface specific tests.
|
|
171 |
# And, its simpler :)
|
|
172 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
173 |
||
174 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
175 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
176 |
wt.lock_write() |
|
177 |
self.assertTrue(wt.is_locked()) |
|
178 |
self.assertTrue(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
179 |
||
180 |
# manually unlock the branch, preparing a LockNotHeld error.
|
|
181 |
wt.branch.unlock() |
|
182 |
# the branch *may* still be locked here, if its an all-in-one
|
|
1852.4.6
by Robert Collins
Review feedback. |
183 |
# implementation because there is a single lock object with three
|
184 |
# references on it, and unlocking the branch only drops this by two
|
|
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
185 |
self.assertRaises(errors.LockNotHeld, wt.unlock) |
186 |
# but now, the tree must be unlocked
|
|
187 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
188 |
# and the branch too.
|
|
189 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
190 |
||
191 |
def test_failing_to_lock_branch_does_not_lock(self): |
|
192 |
"""If the branch cannot be locked, dont lock the tree."""
|
|
193 |
# Many implementations treat read-locks as non-blocking, but some
|
|
194 |
# treat them as blocking with writes.. Accordingly we test this by
|
|
195 |
# opening the branch twice, and locking the branch for write in the
|
|
196 |
# second instance. Our lock contract requires separate instances to
|
|
197 |
# mutually exclude if a lock is exclusive at all: If we get no error
|
|
198 |
# locking, the test still passes.
|
|
199 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
200 |
branch_copy = branch.Branch.open('.') |
|
201 |
branch_copy.lock_write() |
|
202 |
try: |
|
203 |
try: |
|
204 |
wt.lock_read() |
|
1852.4.5
by Robert Collins
Change bare except in working tree locking tests to catch LockError only. |
205 |
except errors.LockError: |
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
206 |
# any error here means the locks are exclusive in some
|
207 |
# manner
|
|
208 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
209 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
210 |
return
|
|
211 |
else: |
|
212 |
# no error - the branch allows read locks while writes
|
|
213 |
# are taken, just pass.
|
|
214 |
wt.unlock() |
|
215 |
finally: |
|
216 |
branch_copy.unlock() |
|
217 |
||
218 |
def test_failing_to_lock_write_branch_does_not_lock(self): |
|
219 |
"""If the branch cannot be write locked, dont lock the tree."""
|
|
220 |
# all implementations of branch are required to treat write
|
|
221 |
# locks as blocking (compare to repositories which are not required
|
|
222 |
# to do so).
|
|
223 |
# Accordingly we test this by opening the branch twice, and locking the
|
|
224 |
# branch for write in the second instance. Our lock contract requires
|
|
225 |
# separate instances to mutually exclude.
|
|
226 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
227 |
branch_copy = branch.Branch.open('.') |
|
228 |
branch_copy.lock_write() |
|
229 |
try: |
|
230 |
try: |
|
1957.1.17
by John Arbash Meinel
Change tests that expect locking to fail to timeout sooner. |
231 |
orig_default = lockdir._DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SECONDS |
232 |
try: |
|
233 |
lockdir._DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 1 |
|
234 |
self.assertRaises(errors.LockError, wt.lock_write) |
|
235 |
finally: |
|
236 |
lockdir._DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = orig_default |
|
237 |
||
1852.4.3
by Robert Collins
Alter working tree lock and unlock tests to test via the interface rather than via unpublished internals. |
238 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
239 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
240 |
finally: |
|
241 |
if wt.is_locked(): |
|
242 |
wt.unlock() |
|
243 |
finally: |
|
244 |
branch_copy.unlock() |
|
1997.1.1
by Robert Collins
Add WorkingTree.lock_tree_write. |
245 |
|
246 |
def test_failing_to_lock_tree_write_branch_does_not_lock(self): |
|
247 |
"""If the branch cannot be read locked, dont lock the tree."""
|
|
248 |
# Many implementations treat read-locks as non-blocking, but some
|
|
249 |
# treat them as blocking with writes.. Accordingly we test this by
|
|
250 |
# opening the branch twice, and locking the branch for write in the
|
|
251 |
# second instance. Our lock contract requires separate instances to
|
|
252 |
# mutually exclude if a lock is exclusive at all: If we get no error
|
|
253 |
# locking, the test still passes.
|
|
254 |
wt = self.make_branch_and_tree('.') |
|
255 |
branch_copy = branch.Branch.open('.') |
|
1957.1.17
by John Arbash Meinel
Change tests that expect locking to fail to timeout sooner. |
256 |
|
1997.1.1
by Robert Collins
Add WorkingTree.lock_tree_write. |
257 |
branch_copy.lock_write() |
258 |
try: |
|
259 |
try: |
|
260 |
wt.lock_tree_write() |
|
261 |
except errors.LockError: |
|
262 |
# any error here means the locks are exclusive in some
|
|
263 |
# manner
|
|
264 |
self.assertFalse(wt.is_locked()) |
|
265 |
self.assertFalse(wt.branch.is_locked()) |
|
266 |
return
|
|
267 |
else: |
|
268 |
# no error - the branch allows read locks while writes
|
|
269 |
# are taken, just pass.
|
|
270 |
wt.unlock() |
|
271 |
finally: |
|
272 |
branch_copy.unlock() |